gmane.mail.postfix.user archive

439 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 5). Latest articles →

[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294105
[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:46:57 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294104
[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:22:42 +0200
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294103
[pfx] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294102
[pfx] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:53:40 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294101
[pfx] postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:09:43 +0200
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294100
[pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:26:29 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294099
[pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:05:27 +0200
fc26wuqa--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294098
[pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:59:51 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294097
[pfx] Question about postfix cleanup
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:01:04 +0200
fc26wuqa--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294096
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 09:27:16 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294095
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:31:20 -0400
postfix--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294094
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:30:25 -0400
postfix--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294093
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 10:52:08 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294092
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 07:57:19 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294091
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 01:35:20 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294090
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:43:38 -0400
postfix--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294089
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:18:36 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294088
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:01:10 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294087
[pfx] Re: multiline headers sent to milters
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:51:31 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294086
[pfx] Re: multiline headers sent to milters
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:27:29 +0000
Claus Assmann via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294085
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:21:54 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294084
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:15:18 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294083
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:32:10 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294082
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:28:23 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294081
[pfx] dual server configuration
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:09:07 -0400
postfix--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294080
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294079
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 07:49:39 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294078
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 01:38:24 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294077
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 01:10:46 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294076
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:36:27 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294075
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Wed, 15 Jul 2026 22:17:05 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294074
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:48:46 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294073
[pfx] cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:19:29 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294072
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Thu, 9 Jul 2026 17:03:11 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294071
[pfx] ANN: list.sys4.de: DNSSEC temporary disabled
Tue, 7 Jul 2026 15:57:16 +0200
Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294070
[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.5 and legacy releases 3.10.12, 3.9.13, 3.8.19, 3.7.21, 3.6.19, 3.5.26
Tue, 7 Jul 2026 13:27:31 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294069
[pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.5 and legacy releases 3.10.12, 3.9.13, 3.8.19, 3.7.21, 3.6.19, 3.5.26
Mon, 6 Jul 2026 15:58:06 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294068
[pfx] Re: Configuring a milter for quarantine/hold actions (documentation clarifications)
Mon, 6 Jul 2026 13:39:04 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294067
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Mon, 6 Jul 2026 09:20:13 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294066
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 18:55:24 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294065
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 16:48:59 -0500
Scott Techlist via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294064
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 16:18:37 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294063
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 17:37:32 +0200
Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294062
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 05 Jul 2026 16:49:46 +0200
Christian Pfeiffer via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294061
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 15:58:16 +0200
Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294060
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 13:28:24 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294059
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 07:19:27 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294058
[pfx] Re: [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 13:18:30 +0200
Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294057
[pfx] [heads up] lmdb 1.0
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 09:40:24 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294056
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 23:28:01 +0200
Dusan Obradovic via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294055
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
3 Jul 2026 16:14:25 -0400
John Levine via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294054
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 08:14:15 +0200
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294053
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 15:56:42 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294052
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:13:01 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294051
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 21:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294050
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
2 Jul 2026 21:04:38 -0400
"John R. Levine via Postfix-users" <[email protected]> • #294049
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 01:51:07 +0200
Gerald Galster via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294048
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
Thu, 02 Jul 2026 23:22:02 +0200
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294047
[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
2 Jul 2026 16:55:34 -0400
John Levine via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294046
[pfx] SMTPUTF8
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:05:10 +0200
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294045
[pfx] Postfix is incompatible with LMDB 1.0
Thu, 02 Jul 2026 17:37:57 +0200
Christian Pfeiffer via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294044
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 17:12:10 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294043
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 16:48:33 -0400
Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294042
[pfx] Configuring a milter for quarantine/hold actions (documentation clarifications)
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 16:43:32 -0400
Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294041
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 16:42:42 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294040
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 15:23:29 -0400
Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294039
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 11:08:55 -0400
Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294038
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:36:58 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294037
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 10:13:45 -0400
Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294036
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 09:55:36 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294035
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 09:23:45 -0400
Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294034
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 22:22:32 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294033
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 07:33:24 -0400
Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294032
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 14:23:13 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294031
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:00:00 -0400
Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294030
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:43:40 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294029
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:06:39 -0400
Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294028
[pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294027
[pfx] Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:43:51 -0400
Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294026
[pfx] Re: Attention: Postfix maintainers
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:56:51 +0000
Bluejay Adametz via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294025
[pfx] Re: Attention: Postfix maintainers
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:36:14 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294024
[pfx] Attention: Postfix maintainers
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294023
[pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:19:47 +0200
Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294022
[pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:16:17 +0200
Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294021
[pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:05:21 +0200
Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294020
[pfx] Re: restricting sender to single domain
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:43:21 +1200
Nick Tait via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294019
[pfx] Re: restricting sender to single domain
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:37:28 +1200
Nick Tait via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294018
[pfx] Re: restricting sender to single domain
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 18:31:05 +1200
Nick Tait via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294017
[pfx] restricting sender to single domain
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:01:48 +0200
Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294016
[pfx] restricting sender to single domain
Tue, 23 Jun 2026 15:40:44 -0700
David Koski via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294015
[pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender
Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:05:58 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294014
[pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender
Tue, 23 Jun 2026 15:32:03 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294013
[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Mon, 22 Jun 2026 16:36:00 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294012
[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Tue, 23 Jun 2026 06:21:22 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294011
[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Mon, 22 Jun 2026 16:03:53 -0400
Sean McBride via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294010
[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Mon, 22 Jun 2026 15:48:31 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294009
[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Mon, 22 Jun 2026 12:48:07 -0400
Sean McBride via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294008
[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:34:10 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294007
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 11:31:08 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294006
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.