gmane.mail.procmail.devel

142 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Re: procmail-3.22 compiling error
Mon, 7 May 2012 08:06:37 +1000
[email protected] • #157
Re: procmail-3.22 compiling error
Wed, 2 May 2012 11:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #156
Re: procmail-3.22 compiling error
Tue, 1 May 2012 08:32:54 +1000
[email protected] • #155
Re: procmail-3.22 compiling error
Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:38:39 +0200 (CEST)
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #154
procmail-3.22 compiling error
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:10:27 +1000
[email protected] • #153
Re: Deliver to dovecot dbox format
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:18:07 +0000 (UTC)
Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> • #152
Deliver to dovecot dbox format
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> • #151
Mailinglists moved, anti-spam measures increased
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:29:23 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] (Stephen R. van den Berg) • #150
Re: Forking 'lockfile' code?
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:20:00 +1100
Olaf TNSB <[email protected]> • #149
Forking 'lockfile' code?
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:23:34 +1100
Olaf TNSB <[email protected]> • #148
procmail unique() file bug
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:12:04 -0300
Raul Dias <[email protected]> • #141
Re: Possible bug in pipes.c
Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:54:30 +0100 (CET)
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #140
Possible bug in pipes.c
Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:05:54 -0500
Glenn Willen <[email protected]> • #139
patch: improving error reporting in mailfold.c
Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:17:01 -0500
Jason Pepas <[email protected]> • #136
Error
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:36:55 -0700
"Daniel Kaliel" <[email protected]> • #134
DNS Configuration
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:47:07 +0530
"anirban biswas" <[email protected]> • #133
DNS Configure
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:33:17 +0530
"anirban biswas" <[email protected]> • #132
DNS Configuration
Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:54:22 +0530
"anirban biswas" <[email protected]> • #131
Procmail over NFS Robustness
Sat, 11 Oct 2003 07:59:10 -0700
"Wes L. Zuber" <[email protected]> • #130
Can't create output
Sat, 11 Oct 2003 07:37:34 -0700
"Wes L. Zuber" <[email protected]> • #129
Re: Procmail for M$Exchange (entry points requested)
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:05:58 -0700
Brandon Knitter <[email protected]> • #128
Re: Procmail for M$Exchange (entry points requested)
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:26:25 -0400
Jason Tishler <[email protected]> • #127
Procmail for M$Exchange (entry points requested)
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:25:13 -0700
Brandon Knitter <[email protected]> • #126
Enhancement suggestion
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 09:32:18 -0500
"Chuck Rock" <[email protected]> • #125
a new filter for multipart/base64 encoded messages
Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:07:54 +0200
Peter Englmaier <[email protected]> • #124
update: ORGMAIL sanity check doesn't take MAILSPOOLSUFFIX into account
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 08:42:07 -0500
"David W. Tamkin" <[email protected]> • #123
Outdated procmail mirrors?? + 1 new
16 Jun 2003 15:34:12 +0200
Kookel Mirrors Admin <[email protected]> • #122
Re: Scoring bug in Procmail v3.22
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 07:59:26 +0300
Liviu Daia <[email protected]> • #121
Re: Scoring bug in Procmail v3.22
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 23:44:50 +0200 (CEST)
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #120
Re: Scoring bug in Procmail v3.22
Sun, 08 Jun 2003 16:11:34 -0500
"David W. Tamkin" <[email protected]> • #119
Re: Scoring bug in Procmail v3.22
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 23:41:33 +0300
Liviu Daia <[email protected]> • #118
Re: Scoring bug in Procmail v3.22
Sun, 08 Jun 2003 14:20:41 -0500
"David W. Tamkin" <[email protected]> • #117
Scoring bug in Procmail v3.22
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:38:17 +0300
Liviu Daia <[email protected]> • #116
Hello Procmail-dev! Here it is! program of your dreams!
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:51:48 +0000
Janicea <[email protected]> • #115
Hello Procmail-dev! Here it is!
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:43:32 +0000
Jangel <[email protected]> • #114
I'm not sure.
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:02:54 -0600
<[email protected]> • #113
Procmail-dev, 7-14% weekly. Guaranteed
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:36:58 +0000
Atmos_design <[email protected]> • #112
Re:To All School Employees
Sun, 27 Apr 2003 23:44:48
<[email protected]> • #111
When will she be back?
Sun, 27 Apr 2003 00:40:46 +0800
<[email protected]> • #110
=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?KLGksO0pwve+yMDHILTjueizv7v1LCDE+8T7x9Egs7+79S4uLj8/P0A=?=
Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:51:06 +0900
=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?vcUgIL/rICDDtg==?= <[email protected]> • #109
=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?KLGksO0pvsa0zyEgIMDMILmrvbwgs7+79S4uLj8/P0A=?=
Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:30:05 +0900
=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?vcUgIL/rICAgw7Y=?= <[email protected]> • #108
Procmail-dev, legal and honest opportunities!
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 23:48:18 +0000
Hotsun57 <[email protected]> • #107
Procmail-dev, legal and honest opportunities!
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:36:31 +0000
Mmeegan <[email protected]> • #106
Procmail-dev, Hello! My name is John Turner....
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:56:51 +0000
Emharwal <[email protected]> • #105
Procmail-dev, Hello! My name is John Turner....
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 07:40:47 +0000
Kennein <[email protected]> • #104
Believe Me this can really work if you try it
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 03:36:24 -0400
nvppHello <[email protected]> • #103
Believe Me this can really work if you try it
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 03:35:46 -0400
omdHello <[email protected]> • #102
GREETINGS
Sun, 8 Jan 1995 05:12:55 +0000
"MR JOHN UGUME" <[email protected]> • #101
Believe Me this can really work if you try it
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:53:43 -0400
eofaHello <[email protected]> • #100
Believe Me this can really work if you try it
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:53:45 -0400
vanxHello <[email protected]> • #99