gmane.network.stunnel.user archive

387 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Connection refused, then connects
Fri, 17 May 2019 10:07:20 +0300
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #8440
Connection refused, then connects
Fri, 17 May 2019 13:54:47 +1000
James Brown <[email protected]> • #8439
stunnel 5.54 released
Wed, 15 May 2019 22:53:53 +0200
Michal Trojnara <[email protected]> • #8438
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Wed, 15 May 2019 19:24:20 +0200
Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> • #8437
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Wed, 15 May 2019 09:36:36 -0700
"Eric Eberhard" <[email protected]> • #8436
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Wed, 15 May 2019 08:41:40 +0000
Jochen Bern <[email protected]> • #8435
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Wed, 15 May 2019 00:22:20 +0200
Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> • #8434
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Tue, 14 May 2019 11:30:29 -0700
"Eric Eberhard" <[email protected]> • #8433
Re: Possible to verify client certificate BUT ignore expiration-date?
Tue, 14 May 2019 09:49:03 -0400
Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> • #8432
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Tue, 14 May 2019 11:15:26 +0300
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #8431
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Tue, 14 May 2019 09:57:07 +0200
Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> • #8430
Re: Possible to verify client certificate BUT ignore expiration-date?
Mon, 13 May 2019 15:06:26 -0700
"Eric Eberhard" <[email protected]> • #8429
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Mon, 13 May 2019 15:05:50 -0700
"Eric Eberhard" <[email protected]> • #8428
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Mon, 13 May 2019 15:03:55 -0700
"Eric Eberhard" <[email protected]> • #8427
Possible to verify client certificate BUT ignore expiration-date?
Mon, 13 May 2019 17:28:28 -0400
Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> • #8426
Re: Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Tue, 14 May 2019 00:16:01 +0300
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #8425
Stunnel 5.44 server side 'exec = pppd' runs second child 'pppd' process after reconnection. Bug?
Mon, 13 May 2019 16:07:57 +0000
Martin Got <[email protected]> • #8424
Stunnel for O365 Sending Some Reports but not Others
Fri, 10 May 2019 13:47:26 +0000
David Schmidt <[email protected]> • #8423
Re: Problem with stunnel 5.51
Wed, 8 May 2019 15:16:24 -0400
Carter Browne <[email protected]> • #8422
Re: Problem with stunnel 5.51
Wed, 8 May 2019 15:06:08 -0400
Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> • #8421
Problem with stunnel 5.51
Wed, 8 May 2019 14:47:03 -0400
Carter Browne <[email protected]> • #8420
Automatic stunnel-client reconnect and keep initial session
Wed, 01 May 2019 09:20:38 +0000
Martin Got <[email protected]> • #8419
Keep initial session-ID when stunnel-client reconnect to a stunnel-server
Wed, 01 May 2019 09:12:58 +0000
Martin Got <[email protected]> • #8418
Re: illegal instruction crash 5.50 Debian/Stretch
Mon, 29 Apr 2019 02:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
"Jose Alf." <[email protected]> • #8417
Re: illegal instruction crash 5.50 Debian/Stretch
Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:54:02 +0200
Michal Trojnara <[email protected]> • #8416
illegal instruction crash 5.50 Debian/Stretch
Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:06:11 +0200
Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> • #8415
Either "verifyChain" or "verifyPeer" has to be enabled
Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:27:53 +0200
kovacs janos <[email protected]> • #8414
Re: Stunnel 5.44 client syntax to accept connections on pty?
Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:01:38 +0200
Michal Trojnara <[email protected]> • #8413
Stunnel 5.44 client syntax to accept connections on pty?
Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:43:34 +0000
Martin Got <[email protected]> • #8412
Re: stunnel 5.44 + pppd client side problem
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:00:04 +0200
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8411
Re: Sending original IP (proxy) for smtp
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:38:25 +0300
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #8410
Re: Sending original IP (proxy) for smtp
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:24:12 +1000
James Brown <[email protected]> • #8409
Re: Sending original IP (proxy) for smtp
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:14:01 +0300
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #8408
Sending original IP (proxy) for smtp
Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:52:15 +1000
James Brown <[email protected]> • #8407
Re: stunnel 5.44 + pppd client side problem
Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:31:21 +0000
Martin Got <[email protected]> • #8406
Support for TLS 1.3 Early Data?
Sat, 13 Apr 2019 19:29:01 +0800
hshh <[email protected]> • #8405
Possible memory leak at asn1_lib.c:412: 20417 allocations
Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:21:40 -0400
Marc Smith <[email protected]> • #8404
OCSP validation via AIA responders through a proxy
Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:07:59 +0000
"Olops, Daniel" <[email protected]> • #8403
Re: stunnel 5.44 + pppd client side problem
Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:58:45 +0200
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8402
stunnel 5.44 + pppd client side problem
Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:52:59 +0000
Martin Got <[email protected]> • #8401
Re: Stunnel 5.51 Pop3 Problem?
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:22:01 -0400
Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> • #8400
Re: Connection issues after upgrading to 5.51 (macOS)
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:11:47 +0200
Dennis Preiser <[email protected]> • #8399
stunnel 5.53 released
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:36:59 +0200
Michal Trojnara <[email protected]> • #8398
Re: stunnel 5.51 released
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:39:05 +0200
Michał Trojnara <[email protected]> • #8397
Stunnel 5.51 Pop3 Problem?
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:06:53 +0100
"Colin" <[email protected]> • #8396
Re: stunnel 5.52 released
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:01:13 +0200
Jakob Hirsch <[email protected]> • #8395
Re: stunnel 5.52 released
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:55:20 +0200
Michał Trojnara <[email protected]> • #8394
Re: stunnel 5.52 released
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:50:59 +0200
Jakob Hirsch <[email protected]> • #8393
Re: stunnel 5.51 released
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:38:10 +0200
Jakob Hirsch <[email protected]> • #8392
Re: Stunnel 5.52 building error
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:33:35 +0400
Никита Шелковников <[email protected]> • #8391
Re: Stunnel 5.52 building error
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:27:28 -0500
"Josealf.rm" <[email protected]> • #8390
Re: Stunnel 5.52 building error
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:38:45 +0400
Никита Шелковников <[email protected]> • #8389
Stunnel 5.52 building error
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:16:07 +0400
Никита Шелковников <[email protected]> • #8388
Re: Problems after compiling stunnel 5.16 with openssl 1.0.2k
Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:11:41 +0200
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8387
Problems after compiling stunnel 5.16 with openssl 1.0.2k
Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:05:32 +0200
simona vittori <[email protected]> • #8386
stunnel 5.52 released
Mon, 8 Apr 2019 21:38:02 +0200
Michal Trojnara <[email protected]> • #8385
Re: V5.51 no support for OpenSSL 1.0.2 ?
Mon, 8 Apr 2019 07:32:27 +0000
Duncan Morris <[email protected]> • #8384
Issues after upgrading stunnel to v5.51 on Windows
Mon, 8 Apr 2019 01:06:22 +0200
[email protected] • #8383
Stunnel 5.51 Pop3 Problem?
Sun, 7 Apr 2019 19:57:51 +0100
"Colin" <[email protected]> • #8382
Connection issues after upgrading to 5.51 (macOS)
Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:24:17 +0200
Dennis Preiser <[email protected]> • #8381
Re: V5.51 no support for OpenSSL 1.0.2 ?
Fri, 5 Apr 2019 22:18:27 +0300
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #8380
V5.51 no support for OpenSSL 1.0.2 ?
Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:39:04 +0000
Duncan Morris <[email protected]> • #8379
stunnel 5.51 released
Thu, 4 Apr 2019 22:43:36 +0200
Michal Trojnara <[email protected]> • #8378
Re: Is there a Win32 installer that supports sslVersionMin = TLS1.2?
Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:46:15 +0200
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8377
Re: Is there a Win32 installer that supports sslVersionMin = TLS1.2?
Fri, 29 Mar 2019 21:49:19 +0000 (UTC)
"Jose Alf." <[email protected]> • #8376
Is there a Win32 installer that supports sslVersionMin = TLS1.2?
Thu, 28 Mar 2019 11:24:51 -0700
kent loving <[email protected]> • #8375
Re: OpenVPN with stunnel
Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:25:25 -0400
Carter Browne <[email protected]> • #8374
ERR_SSL_VERSION_INTERFERENCE on Google Chrome v 73.0.3683.86 and stunnel v5.51b1
Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:34:10 +1000
Kolan Koala <[email protected]> • #8373
OpenVPN with stunnel
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 22:23:51 +0000
Heikki Lavaste <[email protected]> • #8372
Re: No more Win32 stunnel?
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:07:22 +0000
John Hall <[email protected]> • #8371
Re: No more Win32 stunnel?
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:21:19 +0000 (UTC)
"Jose Alf." <[email protected]> • #8370
Re: No more Win32 stunnel?
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:15:56 +0000
John Hall <[email protected]> • #8369
Re: No more Win32 stunnel?
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 12:23:28 +0100
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8368
No more Win32 stunnel?
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:52:54 +0000
John Hall <[email protected]> • #8367
Verify peer immediately
Wed, 20 Mar 2019 21:48:29 -0600
Phillip Hellewell <[email protected]> • #8366
Re: stunnel become non-non responsive and very sluggish
Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:27:18 +0100
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8365
stunnel become non-non responsive and very sluggish
Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:51:04 +0000
Joe Phillips <[email protected]> • #8364
Re: How to hide proxy password from config file
Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:42:53 +0100
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8363
Re: How to hide proxy password from config file
Tue, 5 Mar 2019 11:05:11 +0530
Vijay Raghavan P <[email protected]> • #8362
Re: stunnel-users Digest, Vol 176, Issue 3
Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:15:52 +0000
Andrew Smalley <[email protected]> • #8361
Re: FIPS mode not supported
Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:19:38 +0100
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8360
Re: FIPS mode not supported
Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:15:30 +0100
mlrx <[email protected]> • #8359
FIPS mode not supported
Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:14:47 +0100
Yan Renelt <[email protected]> • #8358
dhparam and others
Sat, 2 Mar 2019 15:49:45 +0100
mlrx <[email protected]> • #8357
Re: Issue with NTLM authorisation
Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:40:00 +0100
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8356
Issue with NTLM authorisation
Fri, 1 Mar 2019 00:13:02 +0530
Vijay Raghavan P <[email protected]> • #8355
Re: Tunnel from win32 to Unix
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:48:42 +0100
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8354
Tunnel from win32 to Unix
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:14:05 +0000
Eetu Pikkarainen <[email protected]> • #8353
Re: Stunnel 3.50 Win - CAPI stopped working
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:45:17 +0100
[email protected] • #8352
Re: Stunnel 3.50 Win - CAPI stopped working
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:32:48 +0100
Małgorzata Olszówka <[email protected]> • #8351
Re: Stunnel 3.50 Win - CAPI stopped working
Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:25:53 +0100
Flo Rance <[email protected]> • #8350
Timeout's issue / network stunnel on virtual apps
Sun, 17 Feb 2019 10:36:11 +0200
Marian Andrei Olteanu <[email protected]> • #8349
How to hide proxy password from config file
Sun, 17 Feb 2019 00:30:19 +0530
Vijay Raghavan P <[email protected]> • #8348
(no subject)
Sun, 17 Feb 2019 00:29:23 +0530
Vijay Raghavan P <[email protected]> • #8347
Stunnel 3.50 Win - CAPI stopped working
Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:13:46 +0100
[email protected] • #8346
Re: stunnel stopped working today, had to reboot server
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:31:27 -0500
Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> • #8345
Re: stunnel stopped working today, had to reboot server
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:24:14 -0500
Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> • #8344
Re: stunnel stopped working today, had to reboot server
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 22:09:49 +0200
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #8343
Re: stunnel stopped working today, had to reboot server
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 13:45:10 -0500
Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> • #8342
Re: stunnel stopped working today, had to reboot server
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 20:09:28 +0200
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #8341
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.