gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general archive

825 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 9). Latest articles →

Re: NetBSD system package
Fri, 29 Jun 2018 06:23:00 +0000
"Thomas Mueller" <[email protected]> • #940
wip/basepkg: NetBSD system package
Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:30:02 +0900
Yuuki Enomoto <[email protected]> • #939
Which library provides user space functions in <netinet/sctp_uio.h>?
Sat, 28 Apr 2018 07:05:04 +0000
张 敬强 <[email protected]> • #938
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Thu, 28 Dec 2017 21:02:49 -0800
Eitan Adler <[email protected]> • #937
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Thu, 28 Dec 2017 23:42:37 +0800
Julian Elischer <[email protected]> • #936
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:40:14 +0100
Matthias Apitz <[email protected]> • #935
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:34:41 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #934
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:30:32 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #933
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:52:09 -0700
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #932
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:38:44 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #931
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Mon, 18 Dec 2017 18:54:46 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #930
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:22:50 -0600
"J. Lewis Muir" <[email protected]> • #929
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:18:47 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #928
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Sat, 16 Dec 2017 20:40:21 -0800
Hal Murray <[email protected]> • #927
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Sat, 16 Dec 2017 19:30:02 -0800
Eitan Adler <[email protected]> • #926
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Sat, 16 Dec 2017 21:12:03 -0500
Mark Heily <[email protected]> • #925
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Sat, 16 Dec 2017 11:49:49 -0800 (PST)
"Rodney W. Grimes" <[email protected]> • #924
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Sat, 16 Dec 2017 10:26:02 -0800
Eitan Adler <[email protected]> • #923
RE: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:50:52 -0800
Cy Schubert <[email protected]> • #922
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:11:35 -0600
"J. Lewis Muir" <[email protected]> • #921
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:43:47 -0800 (PST)
Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> • #920
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:47:47 -0800
"Chris H" <[email protected]> • #919
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:33:05 +0300 (MSK)
Maxim Konovalov <[email protected]> • #918
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:26:44 +0300 (MSK)
Maxim Konovalov <[email protected]> • #917
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:51:18 -0800
Eitan Adler <[email protected]> • #916
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Thu, 14 Dec 2017 22:25:13 -0800
John Nemeth <[email protected]> • #915
Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:58:41 -0700
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #914
Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:15:45 -0800
Eitan Adler <[email protected]> • #913
Re: PPS broken in 7.1 - missing interrupt enable in com.c
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:46:49 +0100 (CET)
Havard Eidnes <[email protected]> • #912
PPS broken in 7.1 - missing interrupt enable in com.c
Sun, 29 Oct 2017 21:14:38 -0700
Hal Murray <[email protected]> • #911
Re: Go on NetBSD needs love
Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:49:21 -0700
Brad Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> • #910
Re: Go on NetBSD needs love
Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:31:17 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #909
Re: Go on NetBSD needs love
Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:58:30 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #908
Re: Go on NetBSD needs love
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:36:01 +0000
<[email protected]> • #907
Re: Go on NetBSD needs love
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:41:27 -0700
Brad Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> • #906
Go on NetBSD needs love
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:58:21 -0700
Brad Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> • #905
Re: Questions of lock usage in NetBSD kernel code
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:08:07 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #904
Re: Questions of lock usage in NetBSD kernel code
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:22:26 +0800
Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]> • #903
Re: Questions of lock usage in NetBSD kernel code
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:54:16 +0800
Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]> • #902
Re: Questions of lock usage in NetBSD kernel code
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 02:20:03 +0200
Kamil Rytarowski <[email protected]> • #901
Re: Questions of lock usage in NetBSD kernel code
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:34:00 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #900
Questions of lock usage in NetBSD kernel code
Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:59:43 +0800
Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]> • #899
Re: Just Curious.
Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:42:22 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #898
Re: Just Curious.
Thu, 2 Feb 2017 08:40:15 -0500
D'Arcy Cain <[email protected]> • #897
Just Curious.
Thu, 2 Feb 2017 05:32:48 -0800
Bright Elo <[email protected]> • #896
Re: Endian-specific types
Sun, 11 Sep 2016 01:28:49 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #895
Re: Endian-specific types
Sat, 10 Sep 2016 16:39:18 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #894
Re: Endian-specific types
Sat, 10 Sep 2016 17:46:41 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #893
Re: Endian-specific types
Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:23:31 +0000
<[email protected]> • #892
Re: Endian-specific types
Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:45:07 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #891
Re: Endian-specific types
Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:52:58 +0000
<[email protected]> • #890
Re: Endian-specific types
Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #889
Re: Endian-specific types
Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:28:11 +1000
David Gwynne <[email protected]> • #888
sqlite extensions
Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:03:41 -0400
[email protected] • #887
Re: ftp(1) doesn't glob on ftp://..., patch.
Sun, 31 Jul 2016 07:24:52 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #886
ftp(1) doesn't glob on ftp://..., patch.
Sat, 30 Jul 2016 20:00:37 +0000
[email protected] • #885
Re: t_ro tests are not run on LFS
Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:48:33 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #884
Re: t_ro tests are not run on LFS
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:58:00 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #883
t_ro tests are not run on LFS
Sun, 17 Jul 2016 19:54:32 +0000
[email protected] • #882
Re: Remove MKCRYPTO build option
Thu, 30 Jun 2016 06:45:31 +0800 (PHT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #881
Re: Remove MKCRYPTO build option
Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:55:58 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #880
Re: Remove MKCRYPTO build option
Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:48:28 +0000
<[email protected]> • #879
Remove MKCRYPTO build option
Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:42:03 +0800 (PHT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #878
per-revision reg values (style question)
Thu, 9 Jun 2016 02:50:07 +0000
[email protected] • #877
Re: battery info: apm cannot attach to mainbus: compiling kernel error
Mon, 16 May 2016 13:08:25 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #876
Re: battery info: apm cannot attach to mainbus: compiling kernel error
Mon, 16 May 2016 10:17:52 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #875
battery info: apm cannot attach to mainbus: compiling kernel error
Mon, 16 May 2016 02:58:11 +0000
[email protected] • #874
Re: dwm pkgsrc vs custom compile
Thu, 05 May 2016 16:44:48 -0400
Firecrow Silvernight <[email protected]> • #873
Re: dwm pkgsrc vs custom compile
Thu, 05 May 2016 22:26:40 +0200
Leonardo Taccari <[email protected]> • #872
Re: dwm pkgsrc vs custom compile
Thu, 5 May 2016 13:23:56 -0700
Soren Jacobsen <[email protected]> • #871
Re: dwm pkgsrc vs custom compile
Thu, 05 May 2016 15:37:06 -0400
Firecrow Silvernight <[email protected]> • #870
Re: dwm pkgsrc vs custom compile
Thu, 5 May 2016 19:28:11 +0000
[email protected] • #869
dwm pkgsrc vs custom compile
Thu, 05 May 2016 13:21:52 -0400
Firecrow Silvernight <[email protected]> • #868
Re: Endian-specific types
Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:00:31 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #867
Re: Endian-specific types
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:04:27 +0000
[email protected] • #866
Re: Endian-specific types
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:07:00 +0000
<[email protected]> • #865
Re: Endian-specific types
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:46:00 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #864
Re: Endian-specific types
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:39:25 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #863
Endian-specific types
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:38:57 +0000
[email protected] • #862
Re: Bad bitmasking in tests/lib/libc/gen/t_fpsetmask.c?
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:55:58 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #861
Bad bitmasking in tests/lib/libc/gen/t_fpsetmask.c?
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 00:35:58 +0100
Timo Buhrmester <[email protected]> • #860
Re: Bad bitmasking in tests/lib/libc/gen/t_fpsetmask.c?
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:29:20 +0100
Timo Buhrmester <[email protected]> • #859
可轻减肥胶囊:减肥极品,两周减肥10斤以上。
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:06:33 +0000 (UTC)
"天猫信誉,无效退款" <[email protected]> • #858
Re: Why NetBSD uses monolithic kernel?
Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:28:59 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #857
Re: Why NetBSD uses monolithic kernel?
Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:23:18 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #856
Re: Why NetBSD uses monolithic kernel?
Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:58:15 +0100
AlexandreFressange <[email protected]> • #855
Why NetBSD uses monolithic kernel?
Sat, 14 Nov 2015 06:33:18 -0700 (MST)
français <[email protected]> • #854
Re: How do you do ZFS legacy mounts on 7.0.0 ? -- Monday Afternoon Followup
Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:58:52 -0700
Erik Fair <[email protected]> • #853
Re: How do you do ZFS legacy mounts on 7.0.0 ? -- Monday Afternoon Followup
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:17:13 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #852
Re: How do you do ZFS legacy mounts on 7.0.0 ? -- Monday Afternoon Followup
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:04:42 +0000 (WET DST)
"Jay F. Shachter" <[email protected]> • #851
Re: How do you do ZFS legacy mounts on 7.0.0 ?
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:39:06 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #850
How do you do ZFS legacy mounts on 7.0.0 ?
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:04:38 +0000 (WET DST)
"Jay F. Shachter" <[email protected]> • #849
Re: tail: robustness
Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:32:49 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #848
tail: robustness
Sat, 10 Oct 2015 01:43:28 +0200
Timo Buhrmester <[email protected]> • #847
kernel panics during disk tests
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:34:05 +0100
Jörn Clausen <[email protected]> • #846
Development of fsck_udf
Sat, 03 Jan 2015 17:41:52 +0300
"Alexey Viziryakin" <[email protected]> • #845
Re: NXR search for literal string "sizeof(*"
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:34:11 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #844
Re: NXR search for literal string "sizeof(*"
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:08:59 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #843
Re: NXR search for literal string "sizeof(*"
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:03:03 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #842
NXR search for literal string "sizeof(*"
Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:53:04 -0600
"J. Lewis Muir" <[email protected]> • #841
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.