gmane.os.netbsd.devel.toolchain archive

513 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: Statically allocated guard pages in ELF
Sat, 29 Mar 2025 08:39:05 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #8101
Re: Statically allocated guard pages in ELF
Sat, 29 Mar 2025 13:09:38 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #8100
Re: Statically allocated guard pages in ELF
Sat, 29 Mar 2025 04:46:08 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #8099
Re: Statically allocated guard pages in ELF
Fri, 28 Mar 2025 22:38:50 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8098
Re: Statically allocated guard pages in ELF
Sat, 29 Mar 2025 02:12:41 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #8097
Statically allocated guard pages in ELF
Fri, 28 Mar 2025 19:30:55 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #8096
Re: gdb - stepping in multithread application
Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:38:08 -0500
David Young <[email protected]> • #8095
Re: kernel module with debugging info
Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:32:50 +0000
Robert Swindells <[email protected]> • #8094
Re: kernel module with debugging info
Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:43:02 +0100
Peter Skvarka <[email protected]> • #8093
kernel module with debugging info
Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:10:15 +0100
Peter Skvarka <[email protected]> • #8092
Re: fixing "libtool -module" for C++
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:36:57 +0100
Anthony Mallet <[email protected]> • #8091
Re: fixing "libtool -module" for C++
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 23:35:38 +0100
Jörg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> • #8090
Re: fixing "libtool -module" for C++
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:52:21 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #8089
Re: fixing "libtool -module" for C++
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 20:21:27 +0100
Jörg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> • #8088
Re: fixing "libtool -module" for C++
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:42:21 +0100
Anthony Mallet <[email protected]> • #8087
Re: fixing "libtool -module" for C++
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:31:17 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #8086
Re: fixing "libtool -module" for C++
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:18:31 +0100
Anthony Mallet <[email protected]> • #8085
Re: fixing "libtool -module" for C++
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:19:19 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #8084
fixing "libtool -module" for C++
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:27:30 +0100
Anthony Mallet <[email protected]> • #8083
Re: Examining core dump with gdb
Fri, 14 Mar 2025 13:39:39 -0400
Rob Whitlock <[email protected]> • #8082
Re: Examining core dump with gdb
Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:56:48 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8081
Re: Examining core dump with gdb
Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:41:04 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #8080
Re: Examining core dump with gdb
Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:16:19 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #8079
Examining core dump with gdb
Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:04:26 +0100
Peter Skvarka <[email protected]> • #8078
gdb - stepping in multithread application
Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:57:09 +0100
Peter Skvarka <[email protected]> • #8077
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Fri, 7 Mar 2025 17:45:43 +0100
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8076
Re: set -e (was: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!)
Fri, 07 Mar 2025 06:46:03 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #8075
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Thu, 6 Mar 2025 18:46:08 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8074
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:38:14 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8073
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Thu, 06 Mar 2025 13:32:35 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8072
set -e (was: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!)
Thu, 6 Mar 2025 11:34:29 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #8071
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:05:33 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #8070
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Thu, 6 Mar 2025 08:03:08 +0100
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8069
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Wed, 05 Mar 2025 19:17:06 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8068
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Wed, 05 Mar 2025 17:40:11 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8067
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Thu, 06 Mar 2025 06:02:47 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #8066
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Wed, 5 Mar 2025 23:40:03 +0100
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8065
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Wed, 05 Mar 2025 13:09:38 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8064
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Mon, 03 Mar 2025 18:45:58 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8063
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Mon, 03 Mar 2025 13:09:00 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8062
Re: static linking vs. __attribute__((constructor)) et al
Sun, 02 Mar 2025 18:03:16 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8061
Re: static linking vs. __attribute__((constructor)) et al
Sun, 2 Mar 2025 23:34:32 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8060
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Sun, 02 Mar 2025 14:47:48 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8059
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Sat, 01 Mar 2025 13:13:27 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8058
Re: Booting on RiscPC
Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:19:26 +0000 (GMT)
Stephen Borrill <[email protected]> • #8057
static linking vs. __attribute__((constructor)) et al
Thu, 27 Feb 2025 15:00:49 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8056
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8055
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:58:30 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8054
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:11:06 +0100
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8053
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:09:00 +0100
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8052
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Mon, 24 Feb 2025 21:57:58 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8051
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:32:19 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8050
Re: parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:25:15 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8049
parallel build failure with .c.o rule interrupted mid-step!
Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:04:48 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8048
Re: "common" symbols are no longer common?!?!?!
Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:05:19 +1300
Lloyd Parkes <[email protected]> • #8047
Re: "common" symbols are no longer common?!?!?!
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:54:04 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8046
Re: "common" symbols are no longer common?!?!?!
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 18:24:25 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #8045
Re: "common" symbols are no longer common?
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 11:40:24 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8044
Re: "common" symbols are no longer common?
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 16:52:12 +0100
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #8043
Re: "common" symbols are no longer common?
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 16:39:30 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #8042
Re: "common" symbols are no longer common?!?!?!
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:28:43 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #8041
Re: "common" symbols are no longer common?!?!?!
Sat, 22 Feb 2025 05:51:10 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8040
"common" symbols are no longer common?!?!?!
Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:47:04 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8039
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:41:36 +0100
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8038
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 10:39:58 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #8037
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 10:14:07 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #8036
Re: Tiny allocations alignment requirements vs. jemalloc
Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:38:53 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #8035
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Thu, 06 Feb 2025 19:00:55 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8034
Tiny allocations alignment requirements vs. jemalloc
Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:59:12 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #8033
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:13:12 +0100
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8032
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Sun, 2 Feb 2025 00:37:10 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #8031
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Thu, 30 Jan 2025 14:23:11 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8030
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Thu, 30 Jan 2025 09:00:06 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #8029
Re: How to find where is header file
Tue, 28 Jan 2025 19:23:56 +0100
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8028
How to find where is header file
Tue, 28 Jan 2025 18:35:20 +0100
Peter Skvarka <[email protected]> • #8027
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:30:19 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8026
Re: variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:15:51 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #8025
variable MAKEOBJDIR inside of Makefile
Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:05:42 +0100
Peter Skvarka <[email protected]> • #8024
Re: [PATCH] Transitive LIBDPLIBS, PROGDPLIBS
Mon, 20 Jan 2025 11:22:33 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8023
Re: [PATCH] Transitive LIBDPLIBS, PROGDPLIBS
Mon, 20 Jan 2025 11:20:47 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8022
Re: [PATCH] Transitive LIBDPLIBS, PROGDPLIBS
Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:04:30 +0100
Rhialto <[email protected]> • #8021
Re: Re: [PATCH] Transitive LIBDPLIBS, PROGDPLIBS
Fri, 17 Jan 2025 07:17:40 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #8020
Re: [PATCH] Transitive LIBDPLIBS, PROGDPLIBS
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 07:53:39 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8019
Re: [PATCH] Transitive LIBDPLIBS, PROGDPLIBS
Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:14:29 +0900
PHO <[email protected]> • #8018
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 14:28:38 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #8017
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 23:23:19 +0100
Keve <[email protected]> • #8016
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 14:06:48 +0900
PHO <[email protected]> • #8015
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:32:25 +1300
Lloyd Parkes <[email protected]> • #8014
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:13:22 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8013
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 12:44:09 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8012
Re: [PATCH] Transitive LIBDPLIBS, PROGDPLIBS
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:32:29 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8011
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:42:56 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8010
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:41:25 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8009
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 19:19:06 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #8008
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:50:54 -0700
Brook Milligan <[email protected]> • #8007
Re: Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:23:36 +0000
Robert Swindells <[email protected]> • #8006
Compiling NetBSD mtree in-tree with meson.build
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 15:32:44 +0100
Keve <[email protected]> • #8005
[PATCH] Transitive LIBDPLIBS, PROGDPLIBS
Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:19:14 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #8004
re: building 8.2 toolchain on 10.1: redefinition of le{16,32,64}dec
Wed, 01 Jan 2025 12:25:31 +1100
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8003
building 8.2 toolchain on 10.1: redefinition of le{16,32,64}dec
Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:31:17 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #8002
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.