gmane.text.xml.distributed archive

873 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 9). Latest articles →

RE: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:56:08 -0500
[email protected] • #2885
Re: Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:59:36 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2884
Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:56:45 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2883
RE: Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:45:01 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2882
RE: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:31:42 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2881
RE: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:14:56 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2880
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:46:40 -0500
[email protected] • #2879
Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:46:40 -0500
[email protected] • #2878
Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft)
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:20:15 +0100 (MET)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2877
Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:38:32 -0500 (EST)
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2876
Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:43:18 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2875
Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:59:15 -0500
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2874
Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:18:44 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2873
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:43:52 -0500
[email protected] • #2872
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:46:37 +0100
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #2871
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:48:44 -0500 (EST)
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2870
RE: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:33:07 -0500
[email protected] • #2869
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:26:42 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2868
RE: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:21:42 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2867
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:17:31 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2866
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:13:38 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2865
Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft)
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:38:07 -0500
[email protected] • #2864
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:58:56 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2863
Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:09:33 -0500
[email protected] • #2862
Re: Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:06:15 -0500
[email protected] • #2861
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:46:30 -0500
[email protected] • #2860
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:11:21 -0500
"Patrick R. McManus" <[email protected]> • #2859
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:35:25 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2858
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:30:56 -0500 (EST)
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2857
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:06:26 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2856
Supporting WSA with SOAP features and properties
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:39:32 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2855
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:28:54 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2854
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:08:08 -0500 (EST)
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2853
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:57:38 -0500 (EST)
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2852
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:29:48 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2851
RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:36:17 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2850
RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:51:08 +0100
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #2849
RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:46:48 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2848
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:33:03 -0500
[email protected] • #2847
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:27:13 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2846
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:23:25 -0500
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2845
Re: Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:30:04 -0800
Pete Wenzel <[email protected]> • #2844
Re: Small update to XMLP page..
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:11:27 +0100 (MET)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2843
Small update to XMLP page..
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:41:39 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2842
RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:15:51 -0500
[email protected] • #2841
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:19:42 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2840
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:02:18 -0500
[email protected] • #2839
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:50:16 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2838
RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:15:37 -0800
<[email protected]> • #2837
Re: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:01:32 +0100
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #2836
Re: Request-response and addressing
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:11:12 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2835
Action Item: new XOP issue handling
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:05:13 +0100
HervĂ© Ruellan <[email protected]> • #2834
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:24:06 -0500
[email protected] • #2833
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:58:57 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2832
Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:08:51 -0500
[email protected] • #2831
Re: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:03:21 -0500
[email protected] • #2830
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:37:23 -0500
[email protected] • #2829
Re: Request-response and addressing
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:05:20 -0500
[email protected] • #2828
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:01:38 -0500
[email protected] • #2827
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:23:57 -0500 (EST)
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2826
Re: SOAP/XMPP
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:51:42 -0700
Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> • #2825
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:32:04 -0500
[email protected] • #2824
URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:33:16 +0100
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #2823
Re: Request-response and addressing
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:32:02 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2822
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:16:02 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2821
FW: Updated Simple MEPs Part 2. (fwd)
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:11:07 +0100 (MET)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2820
Request-response and addressing
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:53:05 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2819
Updated Simplified req-resp MEP with soap-response mep
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:37:09 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2818
Updated Simplified req-resp MEP without soap-response
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:36:19 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2817
Probable regrets for 18 January
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:32:44 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2816
Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:49:30 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2815
Re: The role of transfer protocols
Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:50:59 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2814
Re: The role of transfer protocols
Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:12:58 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2813
Re: Thought of the day:
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:34:19 +0100
Jan Algermissen <[email protected]> • #2812
Thought of the day:
Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:17:34 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2811
RE: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:02:15 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2810
Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:50:12 +0100
Jan Algermissen <[email protected]> • #2809
RE: Preliminary work on making envelope optional
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:44:40 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2808
Re: Optional SOAP response; the transfer binding view
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:24:34 -0500
[email protected] • #2807
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:32:41 +0100 (MET)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2806
Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification)
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:44:26 -0500
John Kemp <[email protected]> • #2805
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:28:55 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2804
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:07:41 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2803
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:30 -0500
Marc Hadley <[email protected]> • #2802
Re: Preliminary work on making envelope optional
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:31:18 -0500
[email protected] • #2801
RE: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:29:48 -0500
[email protected] • #2800
Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification)
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:12:17 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2799
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:55:37 -0500
[email protected] • #2798
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:51:54 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2797
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:50:23 -0500
[email protected] • #2796
Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification)
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:03:28 -0500
John Kemp <[email protected]> • #2795
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:11:38 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2794
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:23:52 -0500 (EST)
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2793
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:18:27 -0500
[email protected] • #2792
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:12:29 -0500
[email protected] • #2791
Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire (clarification)
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:28:24 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2790
Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:29:04 -0600
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2789
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:23:54 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2788
FYI: WSDL 2.0 CR - Call for Implementations
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:42:35 -0800
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #2787
Re: Action item - Part 2: SOAP request-response, response, request-optional-response ...
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:17:03 -0500 (EST)
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2786
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.