gmane.text.xml.distributed archive

873 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 9). Latest articles →

RE: 202 in current implementation
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 15:17:07 +0200 (MEST)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2985
Re: ROR proposal issue #1 (aka SC1)
Sat, 1 Apr 2006 00:15:06 -0500
"Mark Baker" <[email protected]> • #2984
Re: ROR proposal issue #2 (aka SC2)
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:11:19 -0500
[email protected] • #2983
ROR proposal issue #1 (aka SC1)
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:50:12 -0800
<[email protected]> • #2982
ROR proposal issue #2 (aka SC2)
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:16:24 -0800
<[email protected]> • #2981
ROR proposal issue #3 (aka SC3)
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:16:18 -0800
<[email protected]> • #2980
RE: 202 in current implementation
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:14:17 -0500
[email protected] • #2979
[ANN]Apache Axis2C 0.9 released
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:14:50 +0600
"Sahan Gamage" <[email protected]> • #2978
RE: 202 in current implementation
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:40:58 +0200 (MEST)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2977
RE: 202 in current implementation
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:59:06 -0500
"Glen Daniels" <[email protected]> • #2976
Draft Simplified SOAP One-way MEP
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:04:53 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2975
Draft SOAP One-way MEP
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:01:13 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2974
202 in current implementation
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:26:25 +0200 (MEST)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2973
How many states on each end?
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:47:11 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2972
Re: Corrected one-way MEP proposal
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:35:17 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2971
Re: Corrected one-way MEP proposal
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:33:00 -0500
[email protected] • #2970
RE: What does FAF mean?
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:42:21 -0500
[email protected] • #2969
RE: What does FAF mean?
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:21:16 -0800
"Vikas Deolaliker" <[email protected]> • #2968
Corrected one-way MEP proposal
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:04:53 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2967
One-way MEP text proposals
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:35:14 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2966
Re: Signaling MEPs
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:16:37 -0500
Marc Hadley <[email protected]> • #2965
Re: multiple MEPs per binding
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:43:04 -0500
[email protected] • #2964
rec 42
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:55:02 +0200 (MEST)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2963
Re: What does FAF mean?
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:25:30 +0200 (MEST)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2962
What does FAF mean?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:55:46 -0800
Anish Karmarkar <[email protected]> • #2961
Re: multiple MEPs per binding
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:43:07 +0200
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #2960
Re: Features as interfaces (was Re: Signaling MEPs)
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:29:55 +0200
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #2959
[Fwd: Re: multiple MEPs per binding]
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:03:39 -0800
Anish Karmarkar <[email protected]> • #2958
Re: Features as interfaces (was Re: Signaling MEPs)
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:25:12 -0500
[email protected] • #2957
Consolidated comments on ROR
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:42:01 -0800
<[email protected]> • #2956
Features as interfaces (was Re: Signaling MEPs)
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:43:52 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2955
Re: Signaling MEPs
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:21:25 -0500
[email protected] • #2954
[ANN] [Axis2] Axis2 0.95 Released
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:42:37 +0600
Deepal jayasinghe <[email protected]> • #2953
[ANN] AXIOM 0.95 Released !!
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:23:00 +0600
Eran Chinthaka <[email protected]> • #2952
Pls ignore
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:09:43 +0600
Deepal jayasinghe <[email protected]> • #2951
RE: Request for one-way message exchange pattern publication
Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:57:55 -0800
<[email protected]> • #2950
Re: Signaling MEPs
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:38:01 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2949
Request for one-way message exchange pattern publication
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:21:28 -0500
Amelia A Lewis <[email protected]> • #2948
Re: Signaling MEPs
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:12:29 -0500
Marc Hadley <[email protected]> • #2947
Re: Signaling MEPs
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:05:16 -0500
[email protected] • #2946
Re: Signaling MEPs
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:57:13 -0500
Marc Hadley <[email protected]> • #2945
RE: XOP, MTOM and RRSHB editorial issues
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:53:37 -0800
<[email protected]> • #2944
Re: Signaling MEPs
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:00:29 -0500
"Mark Baker" <[email protected]> • #2943
Signaling MEPs
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:19:53 -0500
Marc Hadley <[email protected]> • #2942
Re: multiple MEPs per binding
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:04:32 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2941
XOP, MTOM and RRSHB editorial issues
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:20:08 +0100
HervĂ© Ruellan <[email protected]> • #2940
on the use of 202 or 204 in the ROR MEP
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:03:30 +0100 (MET)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2939
Sat. afternoon minutes
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:12:31 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2938
Re: multiple MEPs per binding
Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:43:23 -0500
[email protected] • #2937
Re: multiple MEPs per binding
Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:07:04 +0100
"Mark Baker" <[email protected]> • #2936
Confirmar Suscripci?n a la edici?n para profesionales del Inmobiliam News
Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:28:39
"Inmobiliam News" <[email protected]> • #2935
Re: multiple MEPs per binding
Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:44:53 +0100
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #2934
No XMLP telecon March 8
Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:33:09 -0800
<[email protected]> • #2933
Re: multiple MEPs per binding
Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:47:17 -0500
[email protected] • #2932
Re: multiple MEPs per binding
Sat, 04 Mar 2006 05:37:24 -0800
Anish Karmarkar <[email protected]> • #2931
multiple MEPs per binding
Sat, 4 Mar 2006 08:07:46 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2930
Re: Strongly agin the "strongly typed" meps
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:56:01 +0100
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #2929
Re: Strongly agin the "strongly typed" meps
Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:30:45 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2928
Draft of Web Page describing class of SOAP MEPs
Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:39:13 -0500
[email protected] • #2927
A URI for the class of SOAP MEPs
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:41:35 -0500
[email protected] • #2926
<none>
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:32:37 -0500
[email protected] • #2925
Regrets for any Feb 22nd meeting
Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:30:20 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2924
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:10:51 -0500
[email protected] • #2923
Discovery MEP
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:06:53 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2922
Re: Strongly agin the "strongly typed" meps
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:33:37 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2921
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:13:29 -0800
Anish Karmarkar <[email protected]> • #2920
Strongly agin the "strongly typed" meps
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:51:51 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2919
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:55:41 -0500
[email protected] • #2918
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:57:59 -0500
[email protected] • #2917
Follow-ups to today's call: 3 (SOAP MEPs vs. WSDL MEPs)
Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:34:07 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2916
Follow-ups to today's call: 2 (timing and the trickiness thereof)
Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:30:19 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2915
Follow-ups to today's call: 1 (where do you look?)
Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:18:13 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2914
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:38:39 -0500
[email protected] • #2913
Action Item: Proposed issue resolution
Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:18:28 +0100
HervĂ© Ruellan <[email protected]> • #2912
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:08:38 -0800
Anish Karmarkar <[email protected]> • #2911
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:44:37 -0800
Anish Karmarkar <[email protected]> • #2910
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:28:56 -0500
[email protected] • #2909
Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft)
Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:40:08 +0100 (MET)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2908
Axis2C Milestone Release M0.3 Released
Thu, 02 Feb 2006 05:42:53 +0000
Damitha Kumarage <[email protected]> • #2907
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:41:50 +0100
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #2906
FW: [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: XML Protocol Working Group Charter'
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:51:16 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2905
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:43:05 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2904
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:12:03 +0100
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #2903
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:54:11 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2902
Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft)
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:44:01 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2901
Re: Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:47:28 +0100
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #2900
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:05:43 -0800
Anish Karmarkar <[email protected]> • #2899
Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft)
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:11:12 +0100 (MET)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2898
Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:16:13 -0500
David Hull <[email protected]> • #2897
Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:18:51 -0500
[email protected] • #2896
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:55:32 -0500
[email protected] • #2895
Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft)
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:03:43 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2894
Fw: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:03:41 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2893
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:41:28 -0500
Marc Hadley <[email protected]> • #2892
Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft)
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:15:42 +0100 (MET)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #2891
Re: Regrets for 1 Feb XMLP Telcon (was: Re: Comments on the "drop response-only" Part 2 draft)
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:29:22 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2890
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:11:40 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2889
Re: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:51:27 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2888
RE: The deep difference between request/response and fire-and-forget
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:51:26 -0500
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> • #2887
Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:55:31 +0100
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #2886
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.