org.kernel.vger.linux-numa archive

398 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

memleak with node_cpu_mask_v2;
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:08:39 +0200
Irsa Lobard <[email protected]> • #849
Re: Official git repo for numactl (any other VCS would be fine as well)
Thu, 24 Jul 2014 01:11:36 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #848
Re: Official git repo for numactl (any other VCS would be fine as well)
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:57:20 -0700
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #847
Re: Official git repo for numactl (any other VCS would be fine as well)
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 07:47:44 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #846
Re: [PATCH] build-sys: prevent warning about .depend when running make
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 07:26:19 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #845
Re: Official git repo for numactl (any other VCS would be fine as well)
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:48:57 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #844
Official git repo for numactl (any other VCS would be fine as well)
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:01:38 -0700
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #843
[PATCH] build-sys: prevent warning about .depend when running make
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:49:55 -0700
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #842
Re: [PATCH] Fix numactl --show preferred node for case MPOL_BIND
Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:24:50 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #841
[PATCH] Fix numactl --show preferred node for case MPOL_BIND
Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:53:14 -0400
Bill Gray <[email protected]> • #840
Is there a way to trigger numa_balancing instantly?
Thu, 8 May 2014 18:13:06 +0200
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #839
Re: numastats updates
Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:12:23 -0500 (CDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #838
Re: numastats updates
Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:48:04 -0500 (CDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #837
Re: numastats updates
Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:44:39 +0400
Stanislav Kholmanskikh <[email protected]> • #836
Re: numastats updates
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:03:36 -0500 (CDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #835
Re: numastats updates
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:58:01 +0400
Stanislav Kholmanskikh <[email protected]> • #834
Re: numastats updates
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:57:58 -0500 (CDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #833
Re: numastats updates
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:49:18 +0400
Stanislav Kholmanskikh <[email protected]> • #832
Re: numastats updates
Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:47:05 -0500 (CDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #831
Re: numastats updates
Mon, 7 Apr 2014 03:39:32 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #830
numastats updates
Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:45:27 +0400
Stanislav Kholmanskikh <[email protected]> • #829
Unbalanced CPU utilization on NUMA 4-Socket machine, workload evenly spread on machine.
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:56:58 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #828
Re: Is it possible to disable numa_balance after boot?
Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:33:37 -0800
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> • #827
System uses numa Interleave mode as default policy?
Sat, 4 Jan 2014 23:32:30 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #826
Re: Is it possible to disable numa_balance after boot?
Sat, 4 Jan 2014 22:37:08 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #825
Re: Is it possible to disable numa_balance after boot?
Sat, 4 Jan 2014 19:22:35 +0100
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #824
Is it possible to disable numa_balance after boot?
Sat, 4 Jan 2014 18:46:55 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #823
[PATCH] x86/mm/numa: fix becoming single node on numa machine with 32-bit kernel.
Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:51:05 +0800
Lans Zhang <[email protected]> • #822
[PATCH] numactl: checks for numa when showing hardware
Sat, 23 Nov 2013 03:10:41 -0500
Elena Ufimtseva <[email protected]> • #821
Re: export numa_init
Sun, 13 Oct 2013 03:12:58 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #820
export numa_init
Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:31:18 +0200
Daniel Kozak <[email protected]> • #819
release of 2.0.9
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:03:38 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #818
Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed
Fri, 4 Oct 2013 00:46:01 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #817
Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed
Fri, 4 Oct 2013 00:33:39 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #816
Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed
Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:37:24 +0000
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #815
Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed
Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:56:06 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #814
Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed
Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:48:41 +0000
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #813
Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed
Wed, 2 Oct 2013 21:01:49 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #812
Re: [PATCH 0/2] follow-up patches for new --all option
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:25:04 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #811
Re: [PATCH 0/2] follow-up patches for new --all option
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 19:56:45 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #810
[PATCH 2/2] libnuma: added regression test for new --all option
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:13:17 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #809
[PATCH 1/2] libnuma: new function numa_run_on_node_mask_all added to library manpage
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:13:16 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #808
[PATCH 0/2] follow-up patches for new --all option
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:13:15 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #807
Re: [PATCH 0/2] New numactl option for overriding of policy settings cpuset awareness
Sun, 8 Sep 2013 20:01:15 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #806
Re: [PATCH 2/2] libnuma: new function numa_run_on_node_mask_all was added to libnuma
Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:24:43 -0700
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #805
Re: [PATCH 0/2] New numactl option for overriding of policy settings cpuset awareness
Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:50:01 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #804
[PATCH 2/2] libnuma: new function numa_run_on_node_mask_all was added to libnuma
Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:33:57 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #803
[PATCH 1/2] numactl: new option --all/-a was added for policy settings
Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:33:56 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #802
[PATCH 0/2] New numactl option for overriding of policy settings cpuset awareness
Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:33:55 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #801
Re: [PATCH] numactl: new --allphyscpubind/-A option
Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:54:34 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #800
Re: [PATCH] numactl: new --allphyscpubind/-A option
Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:45:11 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #799
[PATCH] numactl: new --allphyscpubind/-A option
Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:14:11 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #798
Re: [PATCH] numactl: man page and --help output fixes
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:29:43 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #797
[PATCH] numactl: man page and --help output fixes
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:47:14 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #796
Re: [PATCH] Bring numastat up to revision 20130723
Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:11:20 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #795
[PATCH] Bring numastat up to revision 20130723
Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:10:26 -0400
Bill Gray <[email protected]> • #794
Re: memory leaks in numa_run_on_node
Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:15:44 -0400
"Andrew J. Schorr" <[email protected]> • #793
Re: memory leaks in numa_run_on_node
Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:53:36 -0400
"Andrew J. Schorr" <[email protected]> • #792
Re: memory leaks in numa_run_on_node
Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:31:41 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #791
memory leaks in numa_run_on_node
Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:05:12 -0400
"Andrew J. Schorr" <[email protected]> • #790
[PATCH] Fix segfault in read_distance_table when no NUMA
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:56:08 +1000
Ian Wienand <[email protected]> • #789
NUMA performance, optimal settings for multithreaded, memory mapped file access
Wed, 22 May 2013 11:22:52 +0200
Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> • #788
Re: How does numa_parse_nodestring +0-1 works/should work
Thu, 16 May 2013 14:11:26 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #787
How does numa_parse_nodestring +0-1 works/should work
Thu, 16 May 2013 14:00:40 +0200
Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> • #786
[PATCH] libnuma: prototype for numa_bitmask_weight()
Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:51:32 -0600
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #785
Urgent: numactl-2.0.8 - make does not create numastat binary
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:23:25 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #784
libnuma - data types problems
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:46:36 +0100
Fabio Tordini <[email protected]> • #783
Re: [PATCH] Custom interleaved allocation
Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:39:37 +0200
Vasileios Karakasis <[email protected]> • #782
Re: [PATCH] Custom interleaved allocation
Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:21:06 +0100
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #781
[PATCH] Custom interleaved allocation
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:54:56 +0200
Vasileios Karakasis <[email protected]> • #780
Re: numactl using it's own affinity to determine CPU set
Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:17:08 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #779
Re: numactl using it's own affinity to determine CPU set
Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:19:18 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #778
Re: numactl using it's own affinity to determine CPU set
Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:21:40 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #777
Re: numactl using it's own affinity to determine CPU set
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:12:45 -0400
Jon Stanley <[email protected]> • #776
Re: numactl using it's own affinity to determine CPU set
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:41:41 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #775
numactl using it's own affinity to determine CPU set
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:35:42 -0400
Jon Stanley <[email protected]> • #774
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:18:04 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #773
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #772
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:51:31 +0800
Tang Chen <[email protected]> • #771
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #770
Re: [PATCH] Rewrite numastat to also show per-node process stats
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:49:03 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #769
Re: [PATCH] Rewrite numastat to also show per-node process stats
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:49:35 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #768
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #767
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:37:09 -0700
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> • #766
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #765
Re: [PATCH] Rewrite numastat to also show per-node process stats
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:49:40 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #764
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:07:00 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #763
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:10:09 +0800
Wen Congyang <[email protected]> • #762
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:51:34 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #761
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:33:41 +0800
Wen Congyang <[email protected]> • #760
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:10:16 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #759
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:48:13 +0800
Wen Congyang <[email protected]> • #758
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:06:28 +0800
Wen Congyang <[email protected]> • #757
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #756
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:47:56 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #755
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #754
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #753
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:57:36 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #752
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:22:09 +0800
Wen Congyang <[email protected]> • #751
Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Tue, 9 Oct 2012 03:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #750
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.