comp.os.linux.misc archive

1859 archived articles, newest first (page 18 of 19). Latest articles →

Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:32:13 +0100
jkn <[email protected]> • #72366
Re: Anyone else seen this. [Draytek rebooting]
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:29:24 +0100
jkn <[email protected]> • #72365
Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:28:34 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72364
Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:26:22 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72363
Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:20:30 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72362
Re: Anyone else seen this. [Draytek rebooting]
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:17:42 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72361
Re: Anyone else seen this. [Draytek rebooting]
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:16:03 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72360
Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:10:00 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72359
Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 03 Jul 2026 22:09:29 +0100
Richard Kettlewell <[email protected]> • #72358
Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 21:15:42 +0100
John Rumm <[email protected]> • #72357
Re: Anyone else seen this.
3 Jul 2026 19:38:05 GMT
"Jeff Gaines" <[email protected]> • #72356
Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 19:28:26 +0100
Pancho <[email protected]> • #72355
Re: Anyone else seen this. [Draytek rebooting]
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 18:52:48 +0100
jkn <[email protected]> • #72354
Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 17:51:02 +0100
Adrian <[email protected]> • #72353
Re: Anyone else seen this.
03 Jul 2026 17:43:33 +0100 (BST)
Theo <[email protected]> • #72352
Re: Anyone else seen this. [Draytek rebooting]
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:45:06 +0100
jkn <[email protected]> • #72351
Re: Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:37:53 +0100
Andy Burns <[email protected]> • #72350
Anyone else seen this.
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:21:29 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72349
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 20:46:24 +1000
Daniel70 <[email protected]> • #72348
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 11:03:45 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72347
Re: Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:41:50 GMT
Jan Panteltje <[email protected]> • #72346
Re: Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 03:02:20 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72345
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Fri, 3 Jul 2026 03:19:01 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]> • #72344
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:15:53 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72343
Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is FLAT?
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:11:26 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72342
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
2 Jul 2026 21:32:46 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72341
Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is FLAT?
2 Jul 2026 21:26:41 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72340
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 21:07:43 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]> • #72339
Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is FLAT?
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:50:44 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72338
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:48:56 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72337
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:11:23 +1000
Daniel70 <[email protected]> • #72336
Re: Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Thu, 02 Jul 2026 06:23:41 GMT
Jan Panteltje <[email protected]> • #72335
Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is FLAT?
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 14:04:31 +0800
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #72334
Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy?
Thu, 2 Jul 2026 01:56:58 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72333
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
2 Jul 2026 01:57:47 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72332
Re: Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Wed, 01 Jul 2026 14:41:59 -0500
chrisv <[email protected]> • #72331
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 20:23:30 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72330
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 20:22:27 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72329
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
1 Jul 2026 17:43:41 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72328
Re: Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
1 Jul 2026 17:26:33 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72327
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
1 Jul 2026 17:17:52 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72326
Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy?
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 23:41:07 +0800
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #72325
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery (WSL)
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 23:39:00 +0800
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #72324
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 07:53:41 -0700
John Ames <[email protected]> • #72323
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 13:20:23 +0100
"J. P. Gilliver" <[email protected]> • #72322
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 20:28:50 +1000
Daniel70 <[email protected]> • #72321
Re: Early-2014 Macbook Air and Linux Mint Cinnamon
Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:26:47 +0200
"Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> • #72320
Re: OT Re: Joke of the Decade: Liberated Systemd
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 20:59:53 -0000 (UTC)
pothead <[email protected]> • #72319
Re: OT Re: Joke of the Decade: Liberated Systemd
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:21:21 -0000 (UTC)
pothead <[email protected]> • #72318
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 12:00:43 +0200
"Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> • #72317
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:15:10 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72316
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:11:33 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72315
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:08:03 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72314
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:05:05 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72313
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:01:18 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72312
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 04:33:15 -0400
Paul <[email protected]> • #72311
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 04:23:59 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72310
Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy?
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 04:22:38 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72309
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:40:06 +0100
Richard Kettlewell <[email protected]> • #72308
Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy?
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 15:29:55 +0800
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #72307
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 03:29:06 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72306
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 03:16:55 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72305
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 03:13:06 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72304
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 02:53:53 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72303
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 02:33:51 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72302
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 02:04:34 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72301
Re: Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Wed, 01 Jul 2026 05:47:40 GMT
Jan Panteltje <[email protected]> • #72300
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 01:15:21 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72299
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
1 Jul 2026 04:54:00 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72298
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 00:48:17 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72297
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer.... physics? "quantum"?
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 12:24:41 +0800
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #72296
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 00:17:00 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72295
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 22:09:52 -0400
Paul <[email protected]> • #72294
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Wed, 1 Jul 2026 01:48:33 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]> • #72293
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:03:42 GMT
Charlie Gibbs <[email protected]> • #72292
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
30 Jun 2026 23:51:45 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72291
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
30 Jun 2026 23:45:53 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72290
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
30 Jun 2026 23:40:55 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72289
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
30 Jun 2026 23:37:56 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72288
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
30 Jun 2026 23:28:00 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72287
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
30 Jun 2026 23:16:52 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72286
Re: Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
30 Jun 2026 23:07:52 GMT
rbowman <[email protected]> • #72285
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:58:08 -0400
Paul <[email protected]> • #72284
Re: Microsoft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 21:52:32 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]> • #72283
Re: Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:51:05 GMT
Charlie Gibbs <[email protected]> • #72282
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:51:03 GMT
Charlie Gibbs <[email protected]> • #72281
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:51:04 GMT
Charlie Gibbs <[email protected]> • #72280
Re: “Standard” software
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:51:03 GMT
Charlie Gibbs <[email protected]> • #72279
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:32:46 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72278
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:18:47 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72277
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:06:38 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72276
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:27:24 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #72275
Re: Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 15:26:45 GMT
Jan Panteltje <[email protected]> • #72274
Micro$oft Success Built On Sabotage And Bribery
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 14:13:53 +0000
Leroy H <[email protected]> • #72273
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 21:51:17 +0800
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #72272
Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 05:14:15 -0400
c186282 <[email protected]> • #72271
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:05:53 +1000
Daniel70 <[email protected]> • #72270
Re: “Standard” software
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:08:22 +0100
Nuno Silva <[email protected]> • #72269
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:04:58 +0800
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #72268
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license?
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 06:51:27 +0200
german newsgroups <[email protected]> • #72267
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.