gmane.comp.ai.powerloom archive

506 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: assert vs instance-of and other questions
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:02:45 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #106
Re: assert vs instance-of and other questions
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:46:39 +0900
Kotaro Funakoshi <[email protected]> • #105
Re: assert vs instance-of and other questions
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:20:22 +0900
Kotaro Funakoshi <[email protected]> • #104
Re: assert vs instance-of and other questions
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:22:43 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #103
Re: assert vs instance-of and other questions
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:35:44 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #102
assert vs instance-of and other questions
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:01:10 +0900
Kotaro FUNAKOSHI <[email protected]> • #101
Re: failure with RANGE-MIN-CARDINALITY
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:40:34 +0800
Xingzhi Pan <[email protected]> • #100
Re: failure with RANGE-MIN-CARDINALITY
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:55:10 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #99
failure with RANGE-MIN-CARDINALITY
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:31:43 +0800
Xingzhi Pan <[email protected]> • #98
Re: OWL support
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:03:54 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #97
OWL support
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:51:16 +0800
Xingzhi Pan <[email protected]> • #96
Re: forward-chaining issue
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:37:03 +0800
Xingzhi Pan <[email protected]> • #95
Re: forward-chaining issue
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:57:33 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #94
forward-chaining issue
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:55:38 +0800
Xingzhi Pan <[email protected]> • #93
about the new version
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:50:45 +0800
Xingzhi Pan <[email protected]> • #92
Re: PowerLoom Ontologies?
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:32:10 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #91
PowerLoom Ontologies?
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:53:10 +0200
"Patrick Ziegler" <[email protected]> • #90
Re: play(player, game)
Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:24 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #89
Re: play(player, game)
Thu, 26 May 2005 00:40:16 -0400
Octav Popescu <[email protected]> • #88
Re: play(player, game)
Wed, 25 May 2005 18:05:24 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #87
Re: play(player, game)
Wed, 25 May 2005 19:16:53 -0400
Octav Popescu <[email protected]> • #86
Re: play(player, game)
Wed, 25 May 2005 19:00:23 -0400
Octav Popescu <[email protected]> • #85
Re: play(player, game)
Wed, 25 May 2005 12:47:24 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #84
Re: play(player, game)
Wed, 25 May 2005 09:34:24 -0700
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #83
Re: play(player, game)
Wed, 25 May 2005 01:38:27 -0400
Octav Popescu <[email protected]> • #82
Re: play(player, game)
Tue, 24 May 2005 18:46:30 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #81
Re: play(player, game)
Mon, 23 May 2005 17:50:42 -0400
Octav Popescu <[email protected]> • #80
play(player, game)
Fri, 13 May 2005 13:11:34 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #79
play(player, game)
Wed, 11 May 2005 22:18:31 +0200
Krzysztof Janowicz <[email protected]> • #78
concept description allowed in SHIQ?
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:46:34 +0200
"Nguyen Dieu Thu" <[email protected]> • #77
Re: powerloom.PLI and concepts
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:53:31 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #76
Re: Question about closed world
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:29:31 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #75
Question about closed world
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:34:20 -0200
Anderson <[email protected]> • #74
release date
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:16:05 -0500
Octav Popescu <[email protected]> • #73
Re: Question:TimeStamp
Wed, 3 Nov 2004 18:22:13 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #72
Re: Basic Question: Comparision and Arithmetic operators
Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:38:26 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #71
Re: Basic Question: Comparision and Arithmetic operators
Wed, 03 Nov 2004 19:23:34 -0500
Octav Popescu <[email protected]> • #70
Basic Question: Comparision and Arithmetic operators
Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:28:20 -0800 (PST)
kolli kavita <[email protected]> • #69
Question:TimeStamp
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:16:31 -0800 (PST)
kolli kavita <[email protected]> • #68
Question:TimeStamp
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:16:11 -0800 (PST)
kolli kavita <[email protected]> • #67
Conversion tool
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:50:04 -0300
Anderson <[email protected]> • #66
Re: very basic question
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:56:49 -0700
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #65
Re: very basic question
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:29:16 -0700
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #64
very basic question
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:57:46 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #63
very basic question
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:18:52 -0400
"Leo Ferres" <[email protected]> • #62
Re: Clarification: GNU CL and PowerLoom
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:45:44 -0400 (EDT)
Drew McDermott <[email protected]> • #61
Re: GNU Common Lisp & PowerLoom?
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:24:15 -0400 (EDT)
Drew McDermott <[email protected]> • #60
Re: Java front-end for PowerLoom?
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:11:58 -0700
Andrew n marshall <[email protected]> • #59
Re: Java front-end for PowerLoom?
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:00:00 -0700
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #58
Re: larger PowerLoom apps available?
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:54:38 -0700
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #57
Java front-end for PowerLoom?
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:25:02 +0000
[email protected] • #56
Re: Clarification: GNU CL and PowerLoom
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:10:19 +0000
[email protected] • #55
Re: Clarification: GNU CL and PowerLoom
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:37:10 -0700
Andre Valente <[email protected]> • #54
Re: Clarification: GNU CL and PowerLoom
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:03:16 +0200 (CEST)
Andras Simon <[email protected]> • #53
Re: Clarification: GNU CL and PowerLoom
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:23:18 -0700
Andre Valente <[email protected]> • #52
Clarification: GNU CL and PowerLoom
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:28:32 +0000
[email protected] • #51
GNU Common Lisp & PowerLoom?
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:19:06 +0000
[email protected] • #50
larger PowerLoom apps available?
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:08:24 +0000
[email protected] • #49
Re: Integrate PowerLoom with java application
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:36:39 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #48
Integrate PowerLoom with java application
Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Shamima Mithun <[email protected]> • #47
Re: Stella interface
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:36:44 -0700
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #46
Stella interface
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:52:05 -0400
Tom Stanzione <[email protected]> • #45
Re: How can i define a slot for a concept?
Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:21:09 -0700
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #44
Re: How can i define a slot for a concept?
Mon, 31 May 2004 19:08:00 -0700
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #43
How can i define a slot for a concept?
Tue, 01 Jun 2004 09:54:23 +0800
石 崇德 <[email protected]> • #42
how to go in powerloom command interpreter
Sun, 16 May 2004 15:10:08 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #41
how to go in powerloom command interpreter
Fri, 14 May 2004 08:40:41 +0800
"Rabiah Abdul Kadir" <[email protected]> • #40
PowerLoom 3.0.2.beta and SBCL 0.8.8 Redux
Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:38:55 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #39
PowerLoom 3.0.2.beta and SBCL 0.8.8 Redux
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:47:43 -0800
Paul Snively <[email protected]> • #38
More on PowerLoom and SBCL
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:07:28 -0800
Paul Snively <[email protected]> • #37
Re: skolem warnings
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:49:29 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #36
skolem warnings
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:17:14 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #35
skolem warnings
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:24:25 -0800
Jonathan Ito <[email protected]> • #34
PowerLoom 3.0.2.beta and SBCL 0.8.8
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:22:18 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #33
PowerLoom 3.0.2.beta and SBCL 0.8.8
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:07:12 -0800
Paul Snively <[email protected]> • #32
Re: Higher Order Reasoning
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:14:12 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #31
Higher Order Reasoning
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:05:37 +0530 (IST)
Suresh Kumar M <[email protected]> • #30
FREE SATELLITE SYSTEMS
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:21:15 -0500
"Robert" <[email protected]> • #29
FREE SATELLITE SYSTEMS
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:07:06 -0500
"Robert" <[email protected]> • #28
Re: How to do some recursiv inference?
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 15:44:31 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #27
Re: How to do some recursiv inference?
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 13:36:30 -0800
Andrew n marshall <[email protected]> • #26
Problems with default value
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 17:48:16 +0700
[email protected] • #25
Re: How to do some recursiv inference?
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 00:32:14 -0800
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> • #24
Re: How to do some recursiv inference?
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 04:26:03 +0700
[email protected] • #23
How to do some recursiv inference?
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:43:51 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #22
How to do some recursiv inference?
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:25:09 +0700 (WIT)
"M Ridwan A." <[email protected]> • #21
Reg: e-mail address.
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:22:20 -0800 (PST)
srikalyanexport <[email protected]> • #20
RE: Access GUM with Powerloom
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:55:10 +0800
Chow Ian Castor <[email protected]> • #19
Re: Access GUM with Powerloom
Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:46:48 +0100
John Bateman <[email protected]> • #18
Access GUM with Powerloom
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:40:32 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #17
Access GUM with Powerloom
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:32:08 +0800
Chow Ian Castor <[email protected]> • #16
Re: All classes for an instnace?
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 15:02:59 -0800
Andrew n marshall <[email protected]> • #15
All classes for an instnace?
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 14:49:10 -0800
Andrew n marshall <[email protected]> • #14
Re: assertion to English conversion?
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:19:18 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #13
PowerLoom 3.0.2.beta now available for download
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:21:41 -0800
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #12
Re: assertion to English conversion?
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 22:07:32 +0530
Joshua N Pritikin <[email protected]> • #11
Re: problem with 3.0.1 beta, "processing check-types agenda"
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:53:23 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #10
assertion to English conversion?
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:45:52 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #9
assertion to English conversion?
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:00:00 +0530
Joshua N Pritikin <[email protected]> • #8
problem with 3.0.1 beta, "processing check-types agenda"
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:08:24 -0700
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> • #7
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.