gmane.comp.freedesktop.dbus archive

1693 archived articles, newest first (page 12 of 17). Latest articles →

Re: "dbus-monitor --system" stopped monitoring method calls remotely
Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:01:17 +0300
Oleg Kuznecov <[email protected]> • #17058
Re: "dbus-monitor --system" stopped monitoring method calls remotely
Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:55:54 +0100
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17057
Re: "dbus-monitor --system" stopped monitoring method calls remotely
Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:36:43 +0100
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17056
"dbus-monitor --system" stopped monitoring method calls remotely
Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:44:58 +0300
Oleg Kuznecov <[email protected]> • #17055
Re: watches versus sfds
Tue, 3 Apr 2018 12:57:30 +0100
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17054
watches versus sfds
Sun, 1 Apr 2018 14:56:49 -0700
Matt Wette <[email protected]> • #17053
Re: Status of dbus-python
Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:00:41 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17052
Re: Status of dbus-python
Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:16:42 +0100
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17051
Re: Status of dbus-python
Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:19:05 +0200
Alan Martinovic <alan.martinovic-+NedCK/[email protected]> • #17050
Re: Status of dbus-python
Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:52:07 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17049
Re: Status of dbus-python
Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:04:35 +0200
Alan Martinovic <alan.martinovic-+NedCK/[email protected]> • #17048
Re: Status of dbus-python
Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:40:23 +0100
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17047
Status of dbus-python
Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:58:07 +0200
Alan Martinovic <alan.martinovic-+NedCK/[email protected]> • #17046
Re: Service discovery on message bus
Fri, 23 Mar 2018 19:00:39 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17045
Re: Service discovery on message bus
Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:43:50 +0100
Umut Tezduyar Lindskog <umut-v3uyoVUDKFtWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #17044
Re: Service discovery on message bus
Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:33:13 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17043
Re: Service discovery on message bus
Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:18:30 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17042
Service discovery on message bus
Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:47:07 +0100
Umut Tezduyar Lindskog <umut-v3uyoVUDKFtWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #17041
Re: libdbus or gio dbus for multi-threaded service ?
Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:56:52 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17040
Re: libdbus or gio dbus for multi-threaded service ?
Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:49:32 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17039
Re: libdbus or gio dbus for multi-threaded service ?
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:07:09 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17038
Re: libdbus or gio dbus for multi-threaded service ?
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:57:03 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17037
Re: libdbus or gio dbus for multi-threaded service ?
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:41:23 +0000
"Daniel P. Berrange" <dan-TA1HlLrDhUVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #17036
Re: libdbus or gio dbus for multi-threaded service ?
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:40:10 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17035
libdbus or gio dbus for multi-threaded service ?
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:03:04 +0000
"Daniel P. Berrange" <dan-TA1HlLrDhUVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #17034
Announcing dbus 1.13.2
Fri, 2 Mar 2018 01:33:58 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17033
Announcing dbus 1.10.26
Fri, 2 Mar 2018 01:31:47 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17032
Announcing dbus 1.12.6
Fri, 2 Mar 2018 01:30:06 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17031
NetworkManager Question
Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:19:46 -0500
DE H <[email protected]> • #17030
Fail connecting to DBus
Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:02:01 -0500
tj5527 <tj5527-g/[email protected]> • #17029
Announcing dbus 1.13.0
Thu, 8 Feb 2018 20:01:57 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17028
Announcing dbus 1.12.4
Thu, 8 Feb 2018 19:58:17 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17027
Re: How to make automated tests for clients of D-Bus system service?
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 15:31:58 +0100
Miroslav Kravec <[email protected]> • #17026
Re: How to make automated tests for clients of D-Bus system service?
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:46:48 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17025
Re: How to make automated tests for clients of D-Bus system service?
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:32:49 +0100
Miroslav Kravec <[email protected]> • #17024
Re: How to make automated tests for clients of D-Bus system service?
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:31:10 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17023
Re: How to make automated tests for clients of D-Bus system service?
Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:58:39 +0100
Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> • #17022
How to make automated tests for clients of D-Bus system service?
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 11:57:10 +0100
Miroslav Kravec <[email protected]> • #17021
Re: Event-loop-friendly receive_message() call
Fri, 2 Feb 2018 20:31:09 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17020
Announcing D-Bus Specification v0.32
Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:57:32 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17019
Announcing dbus-glib 0.110
Mon, 29 Jan 2018 19:54:42 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17018
Announcing dbus-python 1.2.6
Mon, 29 Jan 2018 19:52:02 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17017
Re: introspection
Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:20:12 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17016
Re: introspection
Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:53:19 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17015
Re: introspection
Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:23:40 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17014
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:17:57 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17013
Re: introspection
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:29:19 +0100
rony <[email protected]> • #17012
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:09:16 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17011
Re: introspection
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:40:25 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17010
Re: libdbus _dbus_connection_block_pending_call blocks until timeout, even after reply is received
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:15:32 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17009
Re: libdbus _dbus_connection_block_pending_call blocks until timeout, even after reply is received
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:39:44 +0000
Manish Narang <[email protected]> • #17008
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 19:51:59 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17007
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:00:28 -0800
Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> • #17006
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:16:29 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17005
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:26:37 +0100
rony <[email protected]> • #17004
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 07:16:29 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #17003
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:23:49 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #17002
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 06:50:42 -0800
Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> • #17001
Re: Fwd: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:33:58 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #17000
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:36:13 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #16999
Re: Fwd: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:59:13 +0100
Miroslav Kravec <[email protected]> • #16998
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:45:19 +0100
Miroslav Kravec <[email protected]> • #16997
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:19:05 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #16996
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:16:52 +0000
Emmanuele Bassi <[email protected]> • #16995
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:55:48 +0100
Miroslav Kravec <[email protected]> • #16994
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:01:47 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16993
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:49:32 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #16992
Re: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:33:10 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16991
Re: Fwd: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:46:21 -0800
Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> • #16990
Re: Fwd: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:17:30 -0500
Earnie <[email protected]> • #16989
Re: Fwd: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:59:25 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #16988
Fwd: What would be a valid D-Bus interface name for a project without domain?
Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:20:43 +0100
Miroslav Kravec <[email protected]> • #16987
Event-loop-friendly receive_message() call
Sun, 21 Jan 2018 14:23:21 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16986
Re: libdbus Missing Async Calls
Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:09:28 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16985
Re: Proxy Objects & Interfaces In DBussy
Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:55:06 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16984
Re: libdbus Missing Async Calls
Sun, 14 Jan 2018 09:30:19 -0800
Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> • #16983
Re: libdbus Missing Async Calls
Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:08:43 +0100
rony <[email protected]> • #16982
Re: Proxy Objects & Interfaces In DBussy
Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:06:12 +0100
rony <[email protected]> • #16981
Re: libdbus Missing Async Calls
Sun, 14 Jan 2018 09:59:06 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16980
Re: libdbus Missing Async Calls
Sat, 13 Jan 2018 08:53:03 -0800
Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> • #16979
Re: libdbus Missing Async Calls
Sat, 13 Jan 2018 19:55:24 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16978
Re: libdbus Missing Async Calls
Fri, 12 Jan 2018 22:23:15 -0800
Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> • #16977
Re: libdbus Missing Async Calls
Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:17:09 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16976
libdbus Missing Async Calls
Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:00:44 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16975
Re: libdbus port on QNX
Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:42:14 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #16974
Re: libdbus port on QNX
Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:15:45 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #16973
libdbus port on QNX
Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:35:30 +0530
Nitin Jain <[email protected]> • #16972
Ubuntu 16.04 dbus authentication failure after join windows domain using winbind
Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:52:18 +0800
q w <[email protected]> • #16971
Re: libdbus _dbus_connection_block_pending_call blocks until timeout, even after reply is received
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:28:22 -0800
Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> • #16970
Re: libdbus _dbus_connection_block_pending_call blocks until timeout, even after reply is received
Sat, 16 Dec 2017 02:57:26 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16969
Re: libdbus _dbus_connection_block_pending_call blocks until timeout, even after reply is received
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:32:18 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #16968
libdbus _dbus_connection_block_pending_call blocks until timeout, even after reply is received
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:38:51 +0000
Manish Narang <[email protected]> • #16967
Client Server Model utilizing System D-Bus for communication and the pydbus library
Fri, 8 Dec 2017 12:54:30 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16966
Re: dbus message not received at client from server
Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:11:42 +1300
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo-kC51rjc0cqs1dNLGKZg6taU/[email protected]> • #16965
Re: dbus message not received at client from server
Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:51:23 -0700
Calvin Lee <[email protected]> • #16964
RE: dbus message not received at client from server
Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:50:18 +0000
Anitha Chandrasekar <[email protected]> • #16963
RE: dbus message not received at client from server
Wed, 22 Nov 2017 08:26:26 +0000
Anitha Chandrasekar <[email protected]> • #16962
Re: dbus message not received at client from server
Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:45:43 +0000
Simon McVittie <smcv-ZGY8ohtN/[email protected]> • #16961
Re: dbus message not received at client from server
Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:35:09 -0700
Calvin Lee <[email protected]> • #16960
dbus message not received at client from server
Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:49:06 +0000
Anitha Chandrasekar <[email protected]> • #16959
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.