gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers archive

1352 archived articles, newest first (page 11 of 14). Latest articles →

FWD: X.Org Telconf Friday 8 October: "Planning The Next Release"
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:49:16 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1034
Date of next feature freeze ? / Re: roadmap
Fri, 08 Oct 2004 02:23:36 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #1033
Re: Release wranglers notes 29 Sep 2004
Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:51:15 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #1032
Friday's release wranglers call -- planning next release
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:36:03 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1031
Release wranglers notes 29 Sep 2004
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:48:17 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1030
Re: Release wranglers call today (Wednesday) -- 6.8 postpartum discussion
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:16:38 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #1029
Re: Release wranglers call today (Wednesday) -- 6.8 postpartum discussion
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:42:30 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1028
Re: Release wranglers call today (Wednesday) -- 6.8 postpartum discussion
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:46:51 -0700
Torrey Lyons <[email protected]> • #1027
Re: Release wranglers call today (Wednesday) -- 6.8 postpartum discussion
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:19:17 +0200
Danny Backx <[email protected]> • #1026
Release wranglers call today (Wednesday) -- 6.8 postpartum discussion
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:08:28 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1025
Re: wednesday or friday release wranglers call?
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:23:46 -0700
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #1024
Re: wednesday or friday release wranglers call?
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:58:47 -0700
Stuart Kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #1023
Re: wednesday or friday release wranglers call?
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:19:14 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #1022
Re: wednesday or friday release wranglers call?
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:09:13 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #1021
wednesday or friday release wranglers call?
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:53:47 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1020
Re: Are we doing a call today?
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:32:18 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1019
Re: Are we doing a call today?
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:29:19 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #1018
Re: Are we doing a call today?
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:14:50 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #1017
Re: Are we doing a call today?
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:09:10 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #1016
Are we doing a call today?
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:35:07 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #1015
Re: FWD : The future of the [Gnome] release team
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:04:07 +0200
Danny Backx <[email protected]> • #1014
Re: FWD : The future of the [Gnome] release team
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:46:29 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #1013
Re: FWD : The future of the [Gnome] release team
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:41:24 +0200
Danny Backx <[email protected]> • #1012
FWD : The future of the [Gnome] release team
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:07:37 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #1011
minutes (brief) from r-w telconf 11am friday 17sept04 (edt)
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:04:37 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #1010
downloading singles
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:06:35 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #1009
Re: Approval of announcement
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:22:35 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1008
Re: Approval of announcement
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:40:39 -0700
stuart kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #1007
Re: Approval of announcement
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:32:18 -0500
[email protected] • #1006
Re: Approval of announcement
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:26:24 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #1005
Re: Approval of announcement
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:19:15 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #1004
Re: Approval of announcement
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:15:53 -0700
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #1003
Approval of announcement
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:13:28 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1002
Today's (Friday) release wranglers call
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:37:02 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1001
Re: (no subject) (is there a call today?)
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:26:03 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #1000
Re: (no subject) (is there a call today?)
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:05:31 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #999
Re: (no subject) (is there a call today?)
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:02:02 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #998
Re: (no subject) (is there a call today?)
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:01:33 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #997
Re: (no subject)
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:59:45 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #996
Re: (no subject) (is there a call today?)
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:57:36 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #995
(no subject)
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:54:22 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #994
Re: CVS head open for submissions again
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:52:33 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #993
CVS head open for submissions again
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:28:37 +0200
Egbert Eich <eich-u7BhqnqprCWvj1b/[email protected]> • #992
Re: CVS status?
Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:10:56 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #991
CVS status?
Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:23:30 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #990
releasing X using bittorrent...
Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:07:29 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #989
Wednesday's release wranglers call
Wed, 8 Sep 2004 00:41:50 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #988
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Sun, 5 Sep 2004 22:08:21 +1000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #987
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Sun, 5 Sep 2004 22:07:00 +1000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #986
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a fewdays..
Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:48:48 +1000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #985
Re: Docs almost finished
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 19:24:28 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #984
Docs almost finished
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 18:05:52 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #983
Minutes from September 3 Release Wranglers call
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:02:27 -0600 (MDT)
Paul Anderson <[email protected]> • #982
Friday's release wranglers call
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:22:46 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #981
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:53:36 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #980
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:14:29 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #979
Re: Minutes from September 1 Release Wranglers call
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 19:51:46 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #978
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 19:47:21 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #977
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 23:17:34 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #976
Re: www.x.org pointer to CVS
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:47:25 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #975
Re: www.x.org pointer to CVS
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:52:18 -0400 (EDT)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #974
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:47:53 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #973
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:36:55 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #972
www.x.org pointer to CVS
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:25:11 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #971
Re: www.x.org pointer to CVS
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 15:36:40 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #970
Minutes from September 1 Release Wranglers call
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:03:51 -0600 (MDT)
Paul Anderson <[email protected]> • #969
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:01:51 -0600 (MDT)
Paul Anderson <[email protected]> • #968
Wednesday's release wranglers call
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:12:44 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #967
Re: Minutes from August 30 Release Wranglers call
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:22:14 +0200
Danny Backx <[email protected]> • #966
Re: Minutes from August 30 Release Wranglers call
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:39:43 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #965
Re: Minutes from August 30 Release Wranglers call
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:22:13 +0200
Danny Backx <[email protected]> • #964
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:36:21 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #963
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:46:55 -0700
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #962
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:16:26 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #961
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for afewdays..
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:03:55 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #960
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:00:34 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #959
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:28:05 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #958
Re: Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:38:30 -0700
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #957
Minutes from X.Org Architecture Call for 30 August 2004
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:55:16 -0600 (MDT)
Paul Anderson <[email protected]> • #956
Minutes from August 30 Release Wranglers call
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:08:35 -0600 (MDT)
Paul Anderson <[email protected]> • #955
[Fwd: Re: Xorg: Xim deadlock in threaded apps]
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:50:42 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #954
Monday's release wranglers call
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:01:47 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #953
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a fewdays..
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:52:52 +1000
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #952
Completed build of XORG-6_7_99_903 on Arm Netwinder
Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:29:31 -0500
Mark Berry <[email protected]> • #951
Re: Xorg RC3: Undefined symbol "KEYBOARD"
Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:35:47 +0200
Kristian Høgsberg <krh-1OA22m9ORUweIZ0/[email protected]> • #950
Re: Xorg RC3: Undefined symbol "KEYBOARD"
Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:22:42 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #949
Re: Xorg RC3: Undefined symbol "KEYBOARD"
Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:13:03 +0200
Kristian Høgsberg <krh-1OA22m9ORUweIZ0/[email protected]> • #948
Xorg RC3: Undefined symbol "KEYBOARD"
Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:52:44 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #947
Testing with multiple GL applications...
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:17:18 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #946
Re: Release wranglers call today
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:09:28 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #945
Release wranglers call today
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:32:20 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #944
Need hosting for call tomorrow
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:32:04 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #943
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a fewdays..
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:09:44 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #942
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:06:02 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart Anderson <anderson-zEVBPjwFtHNWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #941
Re: Failed build of xorg on Arm Netwinder
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:39:12 -0500
Donnie Berkholz <[email protected]> • #940
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:42:40 -0400
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #939
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:11:13 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart Anderson <anderson-zEVBPjwFtHNWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #938
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:58:35 -0400
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #937
Re: Failed build of xorg on Arm Netwinder
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:47:19 -0400
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #936
Re: Minutes from August 25 Release Wranglers call
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:19:39 +1000
[email protected] (Daniel Stone) • #935
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.