gmane.comp.freedesktop.release-wranglers archive

1352 archived articles, newest first (page 12 of 14). Latest articles →

Re: Minutes from August 25 Release Wranglers call
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:33:03 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #934
Re: Minutes from August 25 Release Wranglers call
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 03:26:05 +1000
[email protected] (Daniel Stone) • #933
Minutes from August 25 Release Wranglers call
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:17:39 -0600 (MDT)
Paul Anderson <[email protected]> • #932
Re: Release wranglers call today
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:54:06 -0700
Stuart Kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #931
Release wranglers call today
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:19:59 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #930
Re: Proposals for release delay and extending committers list
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:28:06 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #929
Re: bugzilla down??
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:52:01 -0400
Alex Deucher <[email protected]> • #928
Re: bugzilla down??
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:58:39 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart Anderson <anderson-zEVBPjwFtHNWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #927
Re: bugzilla down??
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:06:04 +1000
[email protected] (Daniel Stone) • #926
Re: bugzilla down??
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:05:05 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #925
bugzilla down??
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:11:58 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #924
bugzilla.freedesktop.org?
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:18:11 +0200
Egbert Eich <eich-u7BhqnqprCWvj1b/[email protected]> • #923
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:08:19 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #922
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:36:22 -0700
Torrey Lyons <[email protected]> • #921
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:45:57 -0400
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #920
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:44:35 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #919
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:50:56 -0700
Torrey Lyons <[email protected]> • #918
Re: Proposals for release delay and extending committers list
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:36:55 -0700
Eric Anholt <[email protected]> • #917
Re: Proposals for release delay and extending committers list
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:08:28 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #916
Proposals for release delay and extending committers list
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:56:39 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #915
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:04:03 -0700
Stuart Kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #914
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:55:09 -0400
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #913
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:51:32 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #912
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:46:06 -0700
Stuart Kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #911
Re: u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:36:35 -0700
Stuart Kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #910
u_int32_t vs uint32_t
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:00:50 -0700
Stuart Kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #909
Build Broken on Solaris: xc/lib/Xdmcp/Wraphelp.c, Wrap.h
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:29:09 -0700
Stuart Kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #908
Re: Status updates for feature freeze
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:30:42 +0200
Egbert Eich <eich-u7BhqnqprCWvj1b/[email protected]> • #907
No release wranglers meeting on Monday
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:56:13 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #906
Re: Failed build of xorg on Arm Netwinder
Sun, 22 Aug 2004 22:27:40 -0500
Donnie Berkholz <[email protected]> • #905
Failed build of xorg on Arm Netwinder
Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:31:06 -0500
Mark Berry <[email protected]> • #904
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away forafewdays...
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 04:07:55 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #903
Changing features after the feature freeze / was: Re: Minutes from 16 Aug 2004 release wranglers call
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 03:02:10 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #902
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a few days..
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 02:20:45 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #901
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for afewdays...
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:14:37 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #900
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a fewdays..
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 02:52:57 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #899
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a few days..
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:35:04 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #898
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a few days..
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 02:22:20 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #897
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:38:40 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #896
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for afewdays...
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:35:52 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #895
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a few days..
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:54:50 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #894
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:24:01 -0500
[email protected] • #893
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a few days..
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:38:04 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #892
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a fewdays...
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:53:27 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #891
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a fewdays...
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:42:04 +0200
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #890
Re: Official protest against bug 1060 / was: Re: Away for a few days...
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:15:21 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #889
Re: Problems with quake 3 on nvidia binary driver...
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:10:56 -0400 (EDT)
Andy Ritger <[email protected]> • #888
Re: Problems with quake 3 on nvidia binary driver...
Thu, 03 Jan 1980 22:11:52 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #887
Re: Problems with quake 3 on nvidia binary driver...
Thu, 03 Jan 1980 22:08:23 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #886
Re: Problems with quake 3 on nvidia binary driver...
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:43:10 -0400 (EDT)
Andy Ritger <[email protected]> • #885
Release wranglers call today
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:47:25 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #884
Problems with quake 3 on nvidia binary driver...
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 22:02:09 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #883
bin directory...
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:03:13 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #882
Re: SiS driver changes
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:37:16 +0200
Thomas Winischhofer <[email protected]> • #881
Re: SiS driver changes
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:12:25 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #880
Re: SiS driver changes
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:50:13 +0200
Thomas Winischhofer <[email protected]> • #879
Documentation changes
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:58:13 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #878
Re: SiS driver changes
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:25:54 +0200
Thomas Winischhofer <[email protected]> • #877
Re: [brian.paul-CdwZJljFklH+2FeEXyspIVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org: [Xorg] Mesa 6.1 released]
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:29:46 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #876
[brian.paul-CdwZJljFklH+2FeEXyspIVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org: [Xorg] Mesa 6.1 released]
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:00:12 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #875
Re: xdm crypto support (and what to do in general on fd.o).
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:27:09 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #874
Re: xdm crypto support (and what to do in general on fd.o).
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:48:21 +0200
"C. Gatzemeier" <[email protected]> • #873
Release wranglers call today
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:32:46 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #872
Re: xdm crypto support (and what to do in general on fd.o).
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:55:03 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #871
Re: xdm crypto support (and what to do in general on fd.o).
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:42:02 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #870
xdm crypto support (and what to do in general on fd.o).
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:17:28 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #869
Q:X server mysteriously dies
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:08:46 +0200
Danny Backx <[email protected]> • #868
Re: [Xorg] Support of ancient servers in Xorg tree?
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:45:01 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #867
Re: Code freeze and first release candidate tagged
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:27:36 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #866
Re: [Xorg] Support of ancient servers in Xorg tree?
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:54:16 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #865
Re: [Xorg] Support of ancient servers in Xorg tree?
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:51:07 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart Anderson <anderson-zEVBPjwFtHNWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #864
Re: [Xorg] Support of ancient servers in Xorg tree?
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:56:53 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart Anderson <anderson-zEVBPjwFtHNWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #863
Re: Support of ancient servers in Xorg tree?
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:28:35 -0400
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #862
Re: Code freeze and first release candidate tagged
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:22:37 -0400
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #861
Support of ancient servers in Xorg tree?
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:14:58 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #860
Re: [Xorg] Re: Code freeze and first release candidate tagged
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:16:13 -0400
Adam Jackson <[email protected]> • #859
Re: Code freeze and first release candidate tagged
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:42:26 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #858
Re: Code freeze and first release candidate tagged
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:16:42 -0400
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #857
Re: Code freeze and first release candidate tagged
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:55:15 -0700
Stuart Kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #856
Re: Code freeze and first release candidate tagged
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:47:31 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #855
Code freeze and first release candidate tagged
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:32:27 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #854
Re: Minutes from 16 Aug 2004 release wranglers call
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:39:31 +0200
Kristian Høgsberg <krh-1OA22m9ORUweIZ0/[email protected]> • #853
Minutes from 16 Aug 2004 release wranglers call
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:37:47 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #852
Bug 1099 is the "held open" bug
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:54:18 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #851
Re: Release wranglers call today
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:06:01 +0200
Kristian Høgsberg <krh-1OA22m9ORUweIZ0/[email protected]> • #850
Release wranglers call today
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:00:35 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #849
X11R6.8 server status
Sun, 15 Aug 2004 19:30:49 -0700
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #848
Re: Flash/Mozilla/Composite bug details?
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:30:04 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #847
Re: The other kbd bug from today's call
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 06:52:36 +0200
Kristian Høgsberg <krh-1OA22m9ORUweIZ0/[email protected]> • #846
Re: The other kbd bug from today's call
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:30:40 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #845
Re: [Xorg] Installing as non-root user
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:49:35 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #844
Re: [Xorg] Installing as non-root user
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:13:13 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #843
Re: Flash/Mozilla/Composite bug details?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:33:14 -0700
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #842
Re: Flash/Mozilla/Composite bug details?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:01:44 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #841
Re: Flash/Mozilla/Composite bug details?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:50:29 -0700
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #840
Minutes from 13 Aug 2004 Release Wranglers call
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:19:47 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #839
Re: Flash/Mozilla/Composite bug details?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:18:57 -0400
Kevin E Martin <[email protected]> • #838
Re: Flash/Mozilla/Composite bug details?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:07:31 -0700
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #837
Re: The other kbd bug from today's call
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:35:26 +0200
Kristian Høgsberg <krh-1OA22m9ORUweIZ0/[email protected]> • #836
Flash/Mozilla/Composite bug details?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:31:38 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #835
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.