gmane.comp.freedesktop.xserver archive

919 archived articles, newest first (page 7 of 10). Latest articles →

Segmentation Fault with RH 9, kernel 2.6.1
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:54:10 -0600 (CST)
"Douglas McMorris" <[email protected]> • #860
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:48:03 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #859
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:02:08 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #858
a couple more stupid x related questions
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:33:24 +1100
Jaymz Julian <jaymz-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> • #857
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:39:41 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #856
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:23:06 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #855
X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:28:44 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #854
set of patches from the last 3 weeks
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:49:42 +0000
"eric anholt" <[email protected]> • #853
X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:18:36 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #852
Re: problem with xserver - /dev/fb0: No such device
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:04:07 -0800
"Kevin Bowen" <[email protected]> • #851
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:10:39 +0100
Gian Filippo Pinzari <pinzari-aZFS/[email protected]> • #850
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:26:26 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #849
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:31:22 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #848
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:32:30 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #847
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 01:25:45 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #846
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:07:10 -0600
Kevin Puetz <[email protected]> • #845
VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:27:34 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #844
X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:27:29 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #843
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:26:07 +1100 (EST)
Mike MacCana <[email protected]> • #842
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:47:30 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #841
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:25:29 +0200 (IST)
Ely Levy <[email protected]> • #840
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 21:35:17 +0100 (MET)
Alexander Gottwald <alexander.gottwald-hMeZAl7WFGgaBlGTGt4zH4SGEyLTKazZ@public.gmane.org> • #839
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:24:14 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #838
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:35:52 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #837
Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:40:16 -0700
Michael L Torrie <torriem-1ghGyg2U9Gn2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]> • #836
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:00:27 +0100
Gian Filippo Pinzari <pinzari-aZFS/[email protected]> • #835
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:45:12 +0100 (MET)
Alexander Gottwald <alexander.gottwald-hMeZAl7WFGgaBlGTGt4zH4SGEyLTKazZ@public.gmane.org> • #834
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:19:39 +0100
Gian Filippo Pinzari <pinzari-aZFS/[email protected]> • #833
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:36:26 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #832
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:48:41 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #831
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:24:50 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #830
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:51:32 +0100
Alexander Kellett <[email protected]> • #829
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:41:16 +0100
Gian Filippo Pinzari <pinzari-aZFS/[email protected]> • #828
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:44:51 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #827
X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:42:09 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #826
VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:23:29 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #825
Re: Scalable fonts
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:42:40 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #824
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:09:21 -0500
Sean Middleditch <[email protected]> • #823
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:09:29 -0600
Jeff Carr <[email protected]> • #822
Scalable fonts
17 Feb 2004 23:11:52 -0100
Carlos Mateo <[email protected]> • #821
multi monitor information
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:24:22 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #820
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Alex Deucher <agd5f-/[email protected]> • #819
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:43:43 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #818
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:56:14 +0100
Roland Mainz <[email protected]> • #817
Re: problem with xserver - /dev/fb0: No such device
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:09:31 -0800
Kevin Bowen <[email protected]> • #816
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:36:55 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #815
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:50:11 -0800 (PST)
Erik Harrison <[email protected]> • #814
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:15:48 +1100
Jaymz Julian <jaymz-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> • #813
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 02:02:54 +0000
"Steve Salazar" <[email protected]> • #812
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:58:34 +1100
Jaymz Julian <jaymz-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> • #811
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:55:53 +0000
"Steve Salazar" <[email protected]> • #810
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:01:44 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #809
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:48:31 +0000
"Steve Salazar" <[email protected]> • #808
Re: problem with xserver - /dev/fb0: No such device
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:16:11 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #807
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:10:49 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #806
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 08:43:44 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #805
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:00:06 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> • #804
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:50:13 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> • #803
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:14:22 +1100
Jaymz Julian <jaymz-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> • #802
Re: Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:04:58 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #801
problem with xserver - /dev/fb0: No such device
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:18:06 -0800
Kevin Bowen <[email protected]> • #800
Xinerama infrastructure
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 04:07:17 +0000
"Steve Salazar" <[email protected]> • #799
Re: ALT+ IJKL for cursor movement
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:07:56 +0100 (MET)
Alexander Gottwald <Alexander.Gottwald-hMeZAl7WFGgaBlGTGt4zH4SGEyLTKazZ@public.gmane.org> • #798
Re: removing NeedFunctionPrototypes and NeedNestedPrototypes patch (1/3)
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:33:41 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #797
Re: input device support in xserver
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:28:09 +0000
Nicolas Souchu <[email protected]> • #796
ALT+ IJKL for cursor movement
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:46:36 -0800
Ahmad Baitalmal <[email protected]> • #795
Re: input device support in xserver
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:08:24 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #794
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:13:42 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #793
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:15:13 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #792
removing NeedFunctionPrototypes and NeedNestedPrototypes patch (1/3)
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:05:15 +0200 (IST)
Ely Levy <[email protected]> • #791
Re: input device support in xserver
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:12:59 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #790
Re: input device support in xserver
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:08:34 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #789
Re: input device support in xserver
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:38:40 +0100
Robert Wörle PaceBlade Support <[email protected]> • #788
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:16:17 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #787
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 00:49:51 -0500
Dave Dodge <[email protected]> • #786
Re: input device support in xserver
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Alex Deucher <agd5f-/[email protected]> • #785
Re: input device support in xserver
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:52:38 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #784
Re: trouble with Xfont lib
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:41:07 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #783
Re: input device support in xserver
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:21:06 -0500
Peter Johanson <[email protected]> • #782
input device support in xserver
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:10:09 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #781
trouble with Xfont lib
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:47:32 +0100
Frederik Nosi <[email protected]> • #780
Re: [PATCH] 2/5 various cleanups
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:15:07 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #779
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:11:42 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #778
Re: [PATCH] 2/5 various cleanups
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:28:36 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #777
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:24:20 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #776
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:26:07 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #775
Re: [PATCH] 5/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:55:34 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #774
[PATCH] 2/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:49:32 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #773
Re: [PATCH] 3/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:41:50 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #772
[PATCH] 2/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:40:19 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #771
Re: [PATCH] 1/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:39:15 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #770
Re: [PATCH] 5/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:37:27 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #768
Re: [PATCH] 4/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:44:39 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #767
[PATCH] new patch that makes Shape always build
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:49:42 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #766
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:13:01 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #765
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:29:48 -0500
Dave Dodge <[email protected]> • #764
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:21:51 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #763
[PATCH] 4/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:50:27 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #762
[PATCH] 3/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:49:47 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #761
[PATCH] 1/5 various cleanups
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:49:18 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #760
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.