gmane.comp.freedesktop.xserver archive

919 archived articles, newest first (page 6 of 10). Latest articles →

Re: Name of the XFree86-based DDX
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 01:53:10 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #960
Re: Name of the XFree86-based DDX
Tue, 09 Mar 2004 01:33:42 -0500
Harold L Hunt II <huntharo-mhe/[email protected]> • #959
Re: Name of the XFree86-based DDX
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:42:04 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #958
Re: set of patches from the last 3 weeks
Mon, 08 Mar 2004 13:43:00 +0100
Ginokas <[email protected]> • #957
Re: Name of the XFree86-based DDX
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:41:13 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #956
Re: Name of the XFree86-based DDX
Mon, 08 Mar 2004 12:23:15 +0000
Martin Coxall <[email protected]> • #955
Re: Name of the XFree86-based DDX
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:24:32 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #954
Name of the XFree86-based DDX
Sun, 07 Mar 2004 09:06:21 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #953
Re: Resolution vs hinting
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 13:31:55 -0800
Allen Akin <[email protected]> • #952
Possible memory leak in xserver
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 15:06:31 -0500
[email protected] • #951
Re: set of patches from the last 3 weeks
Sat, 06 Mar 2004 15:38:28 +0000
"eric anholt" <[email protected]> • #950
Resolution vs hinting [was: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts]
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:50:50 -0500
"James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos-GRsvFm/Gh/[email protected]> • #949
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:28:16 -0800
Allen Akin <[email protected]> • #948
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:13:51 -0800 (PST)
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl-/[email protected]> • #947
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:54:09 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #946
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:43:30 -0500 (EST)
Karl Rasche <[email protected]> • #945
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:53:22 -0800 (PST)
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl-/[email protected]> • #944
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:46:38 -0700
Brian Paul <brian.paul-CdwZJljFklH+2FeEXyspIVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #943
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 11:47:41 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #942
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:31:29 -0800 (PST)
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl-/[email protected]> • #941
Re: Proposal: Generalized Security Framework for X server
05 Mar 2004 10:23:14 -0500
Eamon Walsh <[email protected]> • #940
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:21:17 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #939
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:28:33 +0200 (IST)
Ely Levy <[email protected]> • #938
A couple of Xnvidia patches
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:58:43 -0700
Scott Zuk <szuk-sK6dKysfGH7D0D/[email protected]> • #937
Re: OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:51:16 -0800
Allen Akin <[email protected]> • #936
OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:09:32 -0500
Carl Worth <cworth-Q8lfr43WVWL2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]> • #935
OpenGL, xserver, and anti-aliased fonts
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:45:47 +1100
catach-m/[email protected] • #934
Re: Proposal: Generalized Security Framework for X server
Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:38:24 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #933
tdfx support
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 19:12:21 +0000
Will Newton <[email protected]> • #932
Re: Proposal: Generalized Security Framework for X server
04 Mar 2004 13:17:27 -0500
Eamon Walsh <[email protected]> • #931
Re: Xati crash
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:40:37 +1100
Jaymz Julian <jaymz-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> • #930
Re: memory efficient compisiting
Thu, 04 Mar 2004 08:37:59 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #929
Re: Xati crash
Thu, 04 Mar 2004 05:40:03 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #928
Re: Misconfigured framebuffer
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:38:41 +0000
Phil Blundell <pb-Y0/[email protected]> • #927
Proposal: Generalized Security Framework for X server
03 Mar 2004 19:19:38 -0500
Eamon Walsh <[email protected]> • #926
fresh CVS checkout fails on autogen.sh
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:25:53 -0500
John McCutchan <ttb-/[email protected]> • #925
Re: Misconfigured framebuffer
Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:57:28 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #924
Re: Some patches for DIX
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:34:42 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #923
Misconfigured framebuffer
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:31:49 +1100
Glenn McGrath <[email protected]> • #922
Re: Some patches for DIX
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:28:51 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #921
Re: Some patches for DIX
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 14:23:28 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #920
Some patches for DIX
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:26:45 -0500
desrt <[email protected]> • #919
Re: set of patches from the last 3 weeks
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:48:49 +0000
Gen Zhang <[email protected]> • #918
Re: memory efficient compisiting
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 14:04:30 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #917
Can't build xserver from CVS
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:51:41 +0100
Özgür Caner <[email protected]> • #916
Re: memory efficient compisiting
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:11:43 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #915
Re: memory efficient compisiting
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:33:51 -0800
Matt Jones <[email protected]> • #914
Re: memory efficient compisiting
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:47:54 -0800 (PST)
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl-/[email protected]> • #913
Non-Standard Resolutions
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:06:50 -0800
Alex <[email protected]> • #912
Re: memory efficient compisiting
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 02:18:31 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #911
Re: memory efficient compisiting
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 17:00:45 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #910
Re: set of patches from the last 3 weeks
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:47:38 -0800
Matt Jones <[email protected]> • #909
Re: memory efficient compisiting
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:35:30 -0700
Brian Paul <brian.paul-CdwZJljFklH+2FeEXyspIVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #908
Re: set of patches from the last 3 weeks
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:23:53 +0100
Ginokas <[email protected]> • #907
memory efficient compisiting
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl-/[email protected]> • #906
Re: Xati crash
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:23:48 +0800
Grahame Bowland <grahame-i8h/[email protected]> • #905
Re: Xati crash
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:42:55 +0000
Giovanni <[email protected]> • #904
Xati crash
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:09:32 +0000
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]> • #903
Possible bug in XSyncValueSubtract
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:53:06 -0500
[email protected] • #902
Re: troubleshooting guide
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:08:12 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #901
Re: troubleshooting guide
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:56:05 +0000
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]> • #900
Re: troubleshooting guide
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:25:54 +0800
Grahame Bowland <grahame-i8h/[email protected]> • #899
Re: troubleshooting guide
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:53:51 +0000
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]> • #898
Re: troubleshooting guide
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:07:55 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #897
RE: still an error with --enable-glx (with latest mesa cvs)
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:01:55 +0000
Giovanni <[email protected]> • #896
troubleshooting guide
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:51:48 +0000
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]> • #895
still an error with --enable-glx (with latest mesa cvs)
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:13:20 +0000
Giovanni <[email protected]> • #894
Re: xserver with glx and dri
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:55:18 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #893
Re: Windows positioned outside screen dimensions
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:38:41 -0800
Stuart Kreitman <Stuart.Kreitman-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #892
Change in DDX interface for Composite extension
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:34:58 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #891
Re: a couple more stupid x related questions
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:26:55 +1100
Jaymz Julian <jaymz-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> • #890
Xnest crashiness - (Get|Set)WindowPixmap
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:52:59 +0100
Gianni Tedesco <[email protected]> • #889
Re: a couple more stupid x related questions
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 07:51:27 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #888
Re: a couple more stupid x related questions
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 02:49:25 +1100
Jaymz Julian <jaymz-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> • #887
[PATCH]: Add 1280x854 to kmode.c
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:20:05 +0100
Gianni Tedesco <[email protected]> • #886
Windows positioned outside screen dimensions
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:14:24 +1100
catach-m/[email protected] • #885
fb composite fixes
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 06:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Eric Anholt <anholt3-/[email protected]> • #884
Re: Accessing window buffers
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:14:07 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #883
Redoing Xcompmgr
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:56:07 +1100
catach-m/[email protected] • #882
Accessing window buffers
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:32:26 -0500
[email protected] • #881
Re: a couple more stupid x related questions
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:24:32 +1100
Jaymz Julian <jaymz-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> • #880
Re: set of patches from the last 3 weeks
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:43:20 +0000
"eric anholt" <[email protected]> • #879
Re: a couple more stupid x related questions
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:48:22 +0100
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #878
Re: ALT+ IJKL for cursor movement
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:15:11 +0100 (MET)
"Peter \"Firefly\" Lund" <[email protected]> • #877
Re: ALT+ IJKL for cursor movement
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:29:23 +1100
Chris Debenham <[email protected]> • #876
Re: ALT+ IJKL for cursor movement
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 00:04:24 +0100 (MET)
"Peter \"Firefly\" Lund" <[email protected]> • #875
Re: Segmentation Fault with RH 9, kernel 2.6.1
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:07:46 -0600
Douglas McMorris <[email protected]> • #874
Re: Large virtual desktop space
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:43:06 +0100 (MET)
"Peter \"Firefly\" Lund" <[email protected]> • #873
Re: Hi, and Where to start
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:37:10 +0100 (MET)
"Peter \"Firefly\" Lund" <[email protected]> • #872
Re: Re: Relicensing the code tree
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:18:30 +0100
Kristof vansant <[email protected]> • #871
Re: Relicensing the code tree
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:04:53 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #870
Relicensing the code tree
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:53:25 +0200
[email protected] • #869
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:53:21 +0100
Gian Filippo Pinzari <pinzari-aZFS/[email protected]> • #868
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:52:42 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #867
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:40:09 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <kpfeifle-eG1X/[email protected]> • #866
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:40:12 +0100
Gian Filippo Pinzari <pinzari-aZFS/[email protected]> • #865
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:07:21 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #864
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:56:13 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #863
xserver with glx and dri
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:22:45 +0100
Capitan X <[email protected]> • #862
Re: X compression techniques (was Re: VNC server based on kdrive using damage extension?)
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:59:02 +0100
Gian Filippo Pinzari <pinzari-aZFS/[email protected]> • #861
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.