gmane.comp.lang.concatenative archive
1298 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 13). Latest articles →
Re: [stack] proof/examples of productivety increase ?
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:59:11 -0700Re: [stack] proof/examples of productivety increase ?
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:41:54 -0700 (PDT)[stack] proof/examples of productivety increase ?
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:42:54 +0300Re: [stack] Re: Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:00:38 -0400[stack] Re: Compression: Huffman Coding with Joy
Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:40:24 -0000[stack] Compression: Huffman Coding with Joy
Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:34:56 -0000[stack] Re: Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems
Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:09:21 -0000Re: [stack] Re: Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems
Sun, 5 Apr 2009 02:27:11 -0400Re: [stack] Motivations to embrace decidable type systems
Sun, 5 Apr 2009 02:15:21 -0400[stack] Re: Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems
Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:41:42 -0000[stack] Motivations to embrace undecidable type systems
Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:14:17 -0000[stack] Motivations to embrace decidable type systems
Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:01:30 -0000Re: [stack] Type for row based languages
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:08:32 -0400Re: [stack] Type for row based languages
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 18:54:54 -0400[stack] Type for row based languages
Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:27:20 -0000Re: [stack] stOck
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 06:19:43 +0300[stack] seaforth dead, colorforth.com updated
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:07:28 -0400Re: [stack] stOck
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 04:55:40 -0400Re: [stack] stOck
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:40:35 +0200Re: [stack] stOck
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 00:50:45 +0300Re: [stack] stOck
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:56:16 -0700Re: [stack] stOck
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:02:19 -0400Re: [stack] Re: Joy and code readability
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:58:55 -0400Re: [stack] stOck
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:33:24 +0300[stack] Re: Joy and code readability
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:25:20 -0000Re: [stack] Joy and code readability
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:40:50 -0700Re: [stack] Joy and code readability
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:27:53 -0400[stack] Joy and code readability
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:37:59 -0000Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:01:50 -0400Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:57:05 -0400Re: [stack] list issues
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:39:49 -0700Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:29:09 -0700Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:39:00 -0700[stack] list issues
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:21:28 -0400Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:47:53 -0400Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:55:23 -0400Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:44:39 -0400Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:42:27 -0400Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:03:16 -0700Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:42:06 -0400Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:23:00 -0400Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:45:40 -0700Re: [stack] FL versus Joy
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:52:51 -0400[stack] FL versus Joy
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:21:15 -0400Re: [stack] stOck
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:43:45 -0700[stack] A variant of XY and F written in C++
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:41:29 +1300Re: [stack] lambda the ultimate: advantages of pointfree?
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:18:07 -0500Re: [stack] lambda the ultimate: advantages of pointfree?
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:25:39 -0700Re: [stack] lambda the ultimate: advantages of pointfree?
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:19:41 -0500Re: [stack] lambda the ultimate: advantages of pointfree?
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:18:25 -0400[stack] a nice introduction to SQUIGOL
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:49:50 -0400[stack] lambda the ultimate: advantages of pointfree?
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:16:11 -0400Re: [stack] Lojban (was: Advantages of cat, joy ..?)
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:27:17 +0300Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:07:27 -0400Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:09:05 -0700Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:54:46 -0400Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:05:01 -0700Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:48:48 -0400Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:32:03 +1300Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:18:44 -0400Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:04:48 +1300Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:35:19 -0400Re: [stack] stOck
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:53:42 +0100Re: [stack] stOck
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:22:55 -0700Re: [stack] stOck
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:12:59 -0400Re: [stack] stOck
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:54:45 +0100[stack] Re: stOck
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:29:25 -0000Re: [stack] stOck
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:23:03 -0400Re: [stack] stOck
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:21:36 -0400Re: [stack] stOck
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:01:35 +0100Re: [stack] stOck
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:10:32 -0700[stack] stOck
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:58:20 +0100Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:44:41 -0400Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:06:19 -0700Re: [stack] recursion is too hard
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:56:48 -0400[stack] recursion is too hard
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:41:31 -0400Re: [stack] unary functions from X to Y?
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:16:24 -0500Re: [stack] unary functions from X to Y?
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:53:29 -0500Re: [stack] unary functions from X to Y?
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:48:31 -0500Re: [stack] Paging Mr Diggins... Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks.
Sun, 8 Mar 2009 23:33:12 -0400Re: [stack] Paging Mr Diggins... Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks.
Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:39:15 -0700Re: [stack] Paging Mr Diggins... Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks.
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:30:33 +1300 (NZDT)Re: [stack] Paging Mr Diggins... Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks.
Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:58:23 -0700[stack] Paging Mr Diggins... Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks.
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:35:09 +1300 (NZDT)Re: [stack] unary functions from X to Y?
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:23:58 +1300Re: [stack] unary functions from X to Y?
Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:00:29 -0700Re: [stack] unary functions from X to Y?
Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:58:11 -0700Re: some thoughts on XY [was Re: [stack] Re: unary functions from X to Y?]
Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:27:30 +1300Re: some thoughts on XY [was Re: [stack] Re: unary functions from X to Y?]
Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:21:02 -0500some thoughts on XY [was Re: [stack] Re: unary functions from X to Y?]
Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:14:15 -0500Re: [stack] things
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:33:19 +0200Re: [stack] What does "concatenative" actually mean?
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 06:18:23 -0500Re: [stack] What does "concatenative" actually mean?
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:48:49 +0100Re: [stack] What does "concatenative" actually mean?
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 04:15:21 -0500Re: [stack] What does "concatenative" actually mean?
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:51:02 +0100Re: [stack] What does "concatenative" actually mean?
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 03:38:13 -0500Re: [stack] What does "concatenative" actually mean?
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:32:16 +0100Re: [stack] Re: unary functions from X to Y?
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:27:29 +1300Re: [stack] What does "concatenative" actually mean?
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:33:25 -0500Re: [stack] What does "concatenative" actually mean?
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:13:27 -0500
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.