gmane.comp.lib.phil archive

380 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
20 Dec 2003 18:13:35 -0500
Jim Blandy <[email protected]> • #1374
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:38:53 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1373
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 05:47:47 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1372
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
19 Dec 2003 21:45:37 -0500
Jim Blandy <[email protected]> • #1371
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:33:13 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1370
Re: blocking pre-emting
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:23:00 -0600
[email protected] • #1369
Is pthread_attr_setschedpolicy() still un-supported?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:11:03 +0100
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #1368
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:31:53 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1367
Re: Recently introduced incompatibility?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:10:12 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1366
Re: Recently introduced incompatibility?
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 03:08:01 +0100
Ferdinand <[email protected]> • #1365
Re: Recently introduced incompatibility?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:24:16 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1364
Recently introduced incompatibility?
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:10:54 +0100
Ferdinand <[email protected]> • #1363
Re: blocking pre-emting
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:30:18 -0600
"Gary S. Robertson" <[email protected]> • #1362
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:24:31 +0800
"Li, Xiao Feng" <[email protected]> • #1361
RE: blocking pre-emting
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:18:33 -0800
"Hong Zhang" <[email protected]> • #1360
blocking pre-emting
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:33:30 +0530
Senthil Nathan V <[email protected]> • #1359
RE: is there a chance for a race condition in pthread_mutex_[un]lock.c?
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:28:56 -0800
"Wan-Teh Chang" <[email protected]> • #1358
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
17 Dec 2003 15:12:55 -0500
Jim Blandy <[email protected]> • #1357
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:44:18 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1356
Re: is there a chance for a race condition in pthread_mutex_[un]lock.c?
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:35:11 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1355
RE: is there a chance for a race condition in pthread_mutex_[un]lock.c?
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:51:43 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1354
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:29:49 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1353
Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:51:08 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1352
Re: is there a chance for a race condition in pthread_mutex_[un]lock.c?
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:00:13 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1351
is there a chance for a race condition in pthread_mutex_[un]lock.c?
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:58:32 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1350
Re: upgrading to nptl
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:43:11 +0100
[email protected] (Måns Rullgård) • #1349
Re: upgrading to nptl
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:29:37 +0100
Christian Leber <[email protected]> • #1348
Re: upgrading to nptl
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 03:04:57 +0100
[email protected] (Måns Rullgård) • #1347
RE: upgrading to nptl
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:54:44 +0800
"Hu, Boris" <[email protected]> • #1346
upgrading to nptl
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:46:17 +0100
Rémi Cohen-Scali <[email protected]> • #1345
RE: [Bug] dlopen() might cause deadlock
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:16:32 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1344
Re: [Bug] dlopen() might cause deadlock
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:55:17 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1343
Re: [Bug] dlopen() might cause deadlock
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:32:51 -0800
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> • #1342
Re: [Bug] dlopen() might cause deadlock
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:04:31 -0800
"Wan-Teh Chang" <[email protected]> • #1341
Re: [TRIVIAL] nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevellock.h
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 01:50:17 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1340
Re: [Bug] dlopen() might cause deadlock
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:33:27 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1339
Re: [Bug] dlopen() might cause deadlock
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:52:06 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1338
[Bug] dlopen() might cause deadlock
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:41:09 +0800
"Li, Adam" <[email protected]> • #1337
[RFC/PATCH] RT-NPTL-2.0
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 16:32:00 +0800
"Hu, Boris" <[email protected]> • #1336
Re: Suspending thread switching while inspecting stacks
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 10:24:46 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1335
Re: Suspending thread switching while inspecting stacks
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 19:22:26 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1334
Suspending thread switching while inspecting stacks
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 12:15:04 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1333
Re: Runtime detection of old Linux threads vs NPTL
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:50:29 -0800
Roland McGrath <[email protected]> • #1332
Runtime detection of old Linux threads vs NPTL
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:17:54 -0600
"Robin Ehrlich" <[email protected]> • #1331
RE: Poor condvar performance
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:43:16 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1330
Re: Poor condvar performance
Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:06:14 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1329
Re: Poor condvar performance
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:12:09 +0100 (CET)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #1328
Re: Poor condvar performance
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:08:34 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1327
Re: Poor condvar performance
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 01:50:45 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1326
Re: Poor condvar performance
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:07:24 +0100 (CET)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #1325
Re: Poor condvar performance
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:09:54 +0100 (CET)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #1324
Re: Poor condvar performance
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:10:51 +0100 (CET)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #1323
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:50:19 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1322
Re: Poor condvar performance
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 04:19:10 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1321
Re: Poor condvar performance
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 03:42:12 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1320
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:38:35 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1319
Re: Poor condvar performance
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:53:52 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1318
Re: Poor condvar performance
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 03:45:59 +0100
"Alexander Terekhov" <[email protected]> • #1317
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:50:43 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1316
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:46:32 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1315
Re: Poor condvar performance
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:27:23 +0100
"Alexander Terekhov" <[email protected]> • #1314
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 18:32:29 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1313
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:53:56 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1312
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:43:14 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1311
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:28:59 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1310
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:05:56 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1309
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:39:03 +0100 (CET)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #1308
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:10:12 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1307
Re: Poor condvar performance
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:30:38 +0100 (CET)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #1306
Re: Poor condvar performance
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:26:02 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1305
Poor condvar performance
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:25:00 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1304
RE: Egad! What are all these thread libraries? :-)
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:47:46 -0500
Horsley Tom <[email protected]> • #1303
Re: Egad! What are all these thread libraries? :-)
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:31:15 +0100
Ferdinand <[email protected]> • #1302
[TRIVIAL] nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevellock.h
Sat, 22 Nov 2003 19:10:17 +0800
"Hu, Boris" <[email protected]> • #1301
Egad! What are all these thread libraries? :-)
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:04:29 -0500
Horsley Tom <[email protected]> • #1300
Re: cancellation with HAVE_FORCED_UNWIND
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:30:56 -0600
Boris Kolpackov <[email protected]> • #1299
glibc 2.2.5 support for restrict
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:22:10 +0530
"madhvesh" <[email protected]> • #1298
Re: state of process shared cond vars?
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 02:00:51 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1297
Re: state of process shared cond vars?
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:04:39 -0800
Roland McGrath <[email protected]> • #1296
Re: state of process shared cond vars?
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:59:55 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1295
RE: How to check the vma maps of threads in /proc?
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:47:23 +0800
"Tian, Kevin" <[email protected]> • #1294
Re: state of process shared cond vars?
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 01:37:35 +0100
"Alexander Terekhov" <[email protected]> • #1293
Re: How to check the vma maps of threads in /proc?
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:17:55 -0500
Ed L Cashin <[email protected]> • #1292
RE: How to check the vma maps of threads in /proc?
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:01:33 +1100
Peter Chubb <[email protected]> • #1291
state of process shared cond vars?
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:39:55 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1290
Re: Need help with accurate timers for multithreaded programs on Linux/X-86
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:29:57 +0000 (UTC)
Boris Kolpackov <[email protected]> • #1289
RE: How to check the vma maps of threads in /proc?
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:28:27 +0800
"Tian, Kevin" <[email protected]> • #1288
How to check the vma maps of threads in /proc?
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:17:26 +0800
"Tian, Kevin" <[email protected]> • #1287
RE: Need help with accurate timers for multithreaded programs on Linux/X-86
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:26:30 +0800
"Hu, Boris" <[email protected]> • #1286
Need help with accurate timers for multithreaded programs on Linux/X-86
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:46:48 -0800
"Rajat P. Garg" <[email protected]> • #1285
Re: thr_join anyone?
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:00:03 -0600 (CST)
David Lloyd <[email protected]> • #1284
Re: thr_join anyone?
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:34:52 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1283
thr_join anyone?
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:43:21 +0100
bert hubert <[email protected]> • #1282
Re: cancellation with HAVE_FORCED_UNWIND
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:52:19 -0500
Daniel Jacobowitz <[email protected]> • #1281
Re: cancellation with HAVE_FORCED_UNWIND
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:27:16 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1280
cancellation with HAVE_FORCED_UNWIND
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:38:11 +0000 (UTC)
Boris Kolpackov <[email protected]> • #1279
Re: NPTL Testing
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 13:02:54 -0500
Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> • #1278
Re: NPTL Testing
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:47:44 -0800
"Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]> • #1277
NPTL Testing
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 14:46:05 +0100
Tony Reix <[email protected]> • #1276
Re: NPTL: pthread_condtimedwait hang or mutex_lock hang
Wed, 05 Nov 2003 20:32:55 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1275
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.