gmane.comp.lib.phil archive

378 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Newbie question on mutexes
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:05:43 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1474
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:00:44 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1473
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:54:14 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1472
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:52:28 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1471
RE: Newbie question on mutexes
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:12:23 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1470
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:09:49 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1469
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:51:49 -0800
"David L" <[email protected]> • #1468
Re: Newbie question on mutexes
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:52:52 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1467
Newbie question on mutexes
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:53:25 -0800
Abhijeet Bisain <[email protected]> • #1466
Re: Barrier reinit? (prev: Thread starvation with mutex)
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:49:06 +0100
Sebastien Decugis <[email protected]> • #1465
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:17:32 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1464
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:08:52 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1463
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:43:20 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1462
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:30:24 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1461
Re: Barrier reinit? (prev: Thread starvation with mutex)
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:28:05 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1460
Barrier reinit? (prev: Thread starvation with mutex)
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:05:44 +0100
Sebastien Decugis <[email protected]> • #1459
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:23:56 -0800
"Wan-Teh Chang" <[email protected]> • #1458
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:55:10 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1457
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:08:06 -0600
"Gary S. Robertson" <[email protected]> • #1456
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:04:26 -0600
"Gary S. Robertson" <[email protected]> • #1455
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:58:07 -0600
"Gary S. Robertson" <[email protected]> • #1454
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:54:02 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #1453
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:16:14 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1452
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:57:03 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1451
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:47:00 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1450
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:29:29 -0800
"David L" <[email protected]> • #1449
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:00:18 +0100
Sebastien Decugis <[email protected]> • #1448
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:50:19 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1447
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:43:07 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1446
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:08:48 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1445
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:01:33 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1444
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:43:25 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1443
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:32:24 -0600 (CST)
David Lloyd <[email protected]> • #1442
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:15:49 -0600
"Gary S. Robertson" <[email protected]> • #1441
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:37:20 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1440
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:49:26 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1439
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:44:13 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1438
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:18:09 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1437
Re: The thread-safe problem about the functions of glibc.
Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:39:04 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1436
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 22:08:14 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1435
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 21:51:31 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1434
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Sun, 08 Feb 2004 22:51:43 -0600
"Gary S. Robertson" <[email protected]> • #1433
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Sun, 08 Feb 2004 10:27:52 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1432
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 15:50:36 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #1431
GPL/LGPL
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:39:01 +0530
"Madhvesh R S" <[email protected]> • #1430
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:39:18 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1429
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 03:27:59 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1428
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 18:32:41 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1427
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:28:47 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1426
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:24:25 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1425
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:23:34 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1424
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:17:46 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1423
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:09:04 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1422
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:40:41 -0600 (CST)
David Lloyd <[email protected]> • #1421
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:16:11 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1420
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 23:06:58 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1419
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 15:03:21 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1418
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 23:03:32 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1417
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 15:01:38 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1416
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:48:22 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1415
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 14:37:41 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1414
RE: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 14:33:41 -0800
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <[email protected]> • #1413
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:33:20 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1412
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 22:25:10 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1411
Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 22:15:06 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1410
Thread starvation with mutex
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:07:48 -0600
Luke Elliott <[email protected]> • #1409
Debugging/Tool support in NPTL
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:24:27 +0100
Tony Reix <[email protected]> • #1408
RE: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:28:14 -0500
"Harrow, Jerry" <[email protected]> • #1407
The thread-safe problem about the functions of glibc.
Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:04:46 +0900
Shunichi Sagawa <[email protected]> • #1406
Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:41:25 +0100
"Matthias Urlichs" <[email protected]> • #1405
Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:52:43 -0800
Roland McGrath <[email protected]> • #1404
Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:18:26 +0100
bert hubert <[email protected]> • #1403
Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:49:14 +0100
"Matthias Urlichs" <[email protected]> • #1402
Re: BUG: NTPL: waitpid() doesn't return?
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:19:23 +0100
bert hubert <[email protected]> • #1401
Re: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:53:05 -0500
Ric Wheeler <[email protected]> • #1400
Re: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:05:39 -0800
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> • #1399
Re: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:27:36 -0800
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> • #1398
RE: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:04:21 -0500
"Jim Laverty" <[email protected]> • #1397
Re: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:17:40 -0800
"Norman Black" <[email protected]> • #1396
Re: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:19:46 -0500
Ric Wheeler <[email protected]> • #1395
RE: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:46:46 +0100 (MET)
Andreas Doerr <[email protected]> • #1394
RE: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:08:08 +0100
Sebastien Decugis <[email protected]> • #1393
RE: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:06:56 +0530
"Madhvesh R S" <[email protected]> • #1392
RE: Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:13:05 -0500
"Jerry Harrow" <[email protected]> • #1391
Anyone interested in having additional debugging support in NPTL via a tracing facility?
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:47:23 -0500
"Harrow, Jerry" <[email protected]> • #1390
Re: Some findings (was Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads))
07 Jan 2004 03:52:42 -0500
Jim Blandy <[email protected]> • #1389
Re: Some findings (was Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads))
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 02:09:38 -0800
Roland McGrath <[email protected]> • #1388
RE: Some findings (was Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general inPOSIX threads))
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:24:58 +0800
"Li, Xiao Feng" <[email protected]> • #1387
Some findings (was Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads))
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:58:33 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1386
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
22 Dec 2003 05:21:58 -0500
Jim Blandy <[email protected]> • #1385
NPTL state for non-Intel machines
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:45:09 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1384
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:42:28 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1383
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
21 Dec 2003 19:16:02 -0500
Jim Blandy <[email protected]> • #1382
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
21 Dec 2003 19:10:06 -0500
Jim Blandy <[email protected]> • #1381
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
21 Dec 2003 18:50:33 -0500
Jim Blandy <[email protected]> • #1380
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 13:45:53 -0800
Roland McGrath <[email protected]> • #1379
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 09:44:11 +0000
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1378
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 09:15:41 +0100
Dragiša Durić <[email protected]> • #1377
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
20 Dec 2003 19:53:50 -0500
Jim Blandy <[email protected]> • #1376
Re: Design hole in nptl (and more general in POSIX threads)
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:51:29 -0800
Roland McGrath <[email protected]> • #1375
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.