gmane.comp.security.programming archive

417 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →

RE: Charging customers on security
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:00:15 +0200
"Koen Vingerhoets" <[email protected]> • #943
Re: Charging customers on security
28 Sep 2004 12:13:40 -0000
Cory Foy <[email protected]> • #942
Re: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:07:43 +0000
ovi <[email protected]> • #941
Re: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:20:55 -0400
Adam Shostack <[email protected]> • #940
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:24:04 -0700
Michael Wojcik <[email protected]> • #939
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:14:38 -0400
"Stan Guzik" <[email protected]> • #938
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:24:07 +0200
"Koen Vingerhoets" <[email protected]> • #937
Re: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:36:18 -0700
King Pang <[email protected]> • #936
Re: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:18:03 -0400
"Jeff Williams" <[email protected]> • #935
RE: Has anyone ever exploited these Websphere (WAS) Weaknesses, If so How ? Can anyone Elaborate ?
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:38:02 -0400
"Brass, Phil (ISS Atlanta)" <[email protected]> • #934
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:47:38 -0400
"Chris Matthews" <[email protected]> • #933
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:24:00 -0500
"Yvan Boily" <[email protected]> • #932
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:11:48 -0500
"Bowes, Ronald (EST)" <[email protected]> • #931
Re: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:37:36 +0200
exon <[email protected]> • #930
Re: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:42:31 -0400
Michael E.Conlen <[email protected]> • #929
Re: Charging customers on security
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:33:50 -0700
Steve Friedl <[email protected]> • #928
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:14:04 +0200
Ton Geurts <[email protected]> • #927
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:07:39 -0400
"Jediah" <[email protected]> • #926
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:45:21 +0200
"Yoav Nir" <[email protected]> • #925
Re: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:57:11 +0000
ovi <[email protected]> • #924
RE: Charging customers on security
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:44:15 +1000
"Mitchell Hume" <[email protected]> • #923
Re: "Selling" a code-audit and politics
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:27:01 -0500 (CDT)
Richard Rager <[email protected]> • #922
Re: Charging customers on security
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:40:29 -0800
"wirepair" <[email protected]> • #921
Re: "Selling" a code-audit and politics
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:41:05 -0400 (EDT)
Atom 'Smasher' <[email protected]> • #920
Charging customers on security
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:16:40 -0700
King Pang <[email protected]> • #919
RE: Inspecting Code for Security
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:13:17 -0500
"Yvan Boily" <[email protected]> • #918
"Selling" a code-audit and politics
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:06:01 -0500 (CDT)
Richard Rager <[email protected]> • #917
RE: Inspecting Code for Security
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:38:48 +0200
"Aleksander P. Czarnowski" <[email protected]> • #916
RE: Inspecting Code for Security
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:39:07 -0500
"Yvan Boily" <[email protected]> • #915
RE: Inspecting Code for Security
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:09:51 -0700
"Michael Howard" <[email protected]> • #914
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:04:46 -0400
"Zed A. Shaw" <[email protected]> • #913
RE: Inspecting Code for Security
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:45:15 +0200
"Aleksander P. Czarnowski" <[email protected]> • #912
RE: Inspecting Code for Security
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:42:08 -0500
"Yvan Boily" <[email protected]> • #911
RE: Inspecting Code for Security
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 06:57:35 -0700
"Luis Hernandez" <[email protected]> • #910
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:28:35 -0300
Javier Blanque <[email protected]> • #909
Re: Inspecting Code for Security
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:09:27 -0400
[email protected] • #908
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:20:23 +0100
Jerry Connolly <[email protected]> • #907
RE: Inspecting Code for Security
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:57:51 +0200
"Aleksander P. Czarnowski" <[email protected]> • #906
Re: Inspecting Code for Security
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:22:47 +0200
Juergen Brauckmann <[email protected]> • #905
More on "selling" a code audit
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:00:47 -0400
<[email protected]> • #904
RE: "Selling" a code-audit.
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:45:23 -0700
"Michael Howard" <[email protected]> • #903
Has anyone ever exploited these Websphere (WAS) Weaknesses, If so How ? Can anyone Elaborate ?
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:00:30 -0700
"bob" <[email protected]> • #902
Re: Inspecting Code for Security
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:24:16 +0900
"George V. Neville-Neil" <[email protected]> • #901
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:39:54 -1000
Jason Coombs PivX Solutions <[email protected]> • #900
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:00:01 -0400
Adam Shostack <[email protected]> • #899
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:14:26 +1200
[email protected] (Peter Gutmann) • #898
Inspecting Code for Security
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:55:35 -0400
[email protected] • #897
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:33:24 -1000
Jason Coombs PivX Solutions <[email protected]> • #896
RE: "Selling" a code-audit.
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:28:55 -0700
"Michael Howard" <[email protected]> • #895
RE: "Selling" a code-audit.
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:28:48 -0700
"Michael Howard" <[email protected]> • #894
Shmoocon CFP & registration information
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:15:45 -0600 (MDT)
shmooconannounce <[email protected]> • #893
RE: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 18:11:51 -0300
"Alexandre Sieira" <[email protected]> • #892
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:42:45 +1000
Warwick Molloy <[email protected]> • #891
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:54:45 -0400
Adam Shostack <[email protected]> • #890
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 13:58:15 -0700
Eric Murray <[email protected]> • #889
RE: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 23:19:52 +0200
"Aleksander P. Czarnowski" <[email protected]> • #888
Fwd: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:06:47 -0400
"John T. Cox" <[email protected]> • #887
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
2 Sep 2004 19:37:56 -0000
Travis Schack <[email protected]> • #886
Security Issues with STL?
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 14:29:13 -0400
D K <[email protected]> • #885
Re: "Selling" a code-audit.
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:35:35 +0600
Dmitry Dvoinikov <[email protected]> • #884
RE: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:47:33 -0400
"Browne, Derek" <[email protected]> • #883
RE: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:39:29 -0400
"Calderon, Juan Carlos (GE Commercial Finance, NonGE)" <[email protected]> • #882
RE: "Selling" a code-audit.
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:36:10 -0700
"Michael Howard" <[email protected]> • #881
"Selling" a code-audit.
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:45:27 -0500
"Yvan Boily" <[email protected]> • #880
Insecure temp file creation fix - peer review please
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:42:28 +0800
Derek Fountain <[email protected]> • #879
Forwarding Windows credentials for a client/server application
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Brian Erdelyi <[email protected]> • #878
RE: Web Application Vulnerability Assessment Tools
Fri, 6 Aug 2004 08:45:18 +0200
"Medzich, Maik" <[email protected]> • #877
Re: Web Application Vulnerability Assessment Tools
Fri, 6 Aug 2004 08:12:28 +0200
"Alex Holst" <[email protected]> • #876
Web Application Vulnerability Assessment Tools
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:18:58 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #875
RE: Encrypted Communications and Predictable Communications?
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:18:20 +0200
"Hadi" <[email protected]> • #874
RE: Microsoft .NET PRNG (fwd)
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 22:15:42 +1200
[email protected] (Peter Gutmann) • #873
RE: Encrypted Communications and Predictable Communications?
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:49:12 +1000
"Michael Silk" <[email protected]> • #872
Re: Encrypted Communications and Predictable Communications?
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:11:56 -0400
Adam Shostack <[email protected]> • #871
Re: Microsoft .NET PRNG
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 03:36:00 +1200
[email protected] (Peter Gutmann) • #870
Re: Encrypted Communications and Predictable Communications?
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 14:17:34 -0500
"Drew Simonis" <[email protected]> • #869
Re: Encrypted Communications and Predictable Communications?
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:09:12 +0000
Bennett Todd <[email protected]> • #868
Re: Encrypted Communications and Predictable Communications?
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:20:02 -0400
Jack Lloyd <[email protected]> • #867
RE: Encrypted Communications and Predictable Communications?
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:28:11 -0400
<[email protected]> • #866
Encrypted Communications and Predictable Communications?
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 10:26:14 -0700
Jonathan Leffler <[email protected]> • #865
Re: Microsoft .NET PRNG
Mon, 02 Aug 2004 12:04:05 -0600
"M. Burnett" <[email protected]> • #864
Apologies regarding my spam filter...
Sun, 1 Aug 2004 23:00:27 -0700
"Thor" <[email protected]> • #863
RE: Microsoft .NET PRNG (fwd)
Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:44:27 +1200
[email protected] (Peter Gutmann) • #862
RE: Microsoft .NET PRNG
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 08:49:59 +1000
"Michael Silk" <[email protected]> • #861
RE: Microsoft .NET PRNG
Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:16:23 +1200
[email protected] (Peter Gutmann) • #860
Re: Microsoft .NET PRNG
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:26:46 -0400
Jack Lloyd <[email protected]> • #859
Re: Microsoft .NET PRNG
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:32:03 -0700
Skip Carter <[email protected]> • #858
RE: Microsoft .NET PRNG
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:52:12 -0300
"Pablo Milano" <[email protected]> • #857
RE: Microsoft .NET PRNG
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:46:47 -0500
"Yvan Boily" <[email protected]> • #856
Microsoft .NET PRNG
Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:40:05 -0500
"Yvan Boily" <[email protected]> • #855
RE: Secure software development documents
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:23:10 -0400
"Scovetta, Michael V" <[email protected]> • #854
Re: Secure software development documents
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:29:12 -0500
[email protected] • #853
Secure software development documents
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
udayan pathak <[email protected]> • #852
Free security server and SDK
Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:17:36 -0400
"Cushing, David" <[email protected]> • #851
RE: Examples of lost security when integrating (secure) SW
Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:04:03 -0500
"Yvan Boily" <[email protected]> • #850
Re: Examples of lost security when integrating (secure) SW
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 12:09:03 -0400
[email protected] • #849
Questions about PLT/GOT redirection
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
read lkml <[email protected]> • #848
RE: Examples of lost security when integrating (secure) SW
Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:33:18 -0400
Jeremy Epstein <[email protected]> • #847
Re: Secure access to system calls for a library?
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:01:00 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #846
Re: Secure access to system calls for a library?
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:10:38 -0400
Jack Lloyd <[email protected]> • #845
Re: Secure access to system calls for a library?
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:20:56 -0400
[email protected] • #844
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.