gmane.comp.web.freemarker.devel archive

384 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:50:01 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8025
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:28:19 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #8024
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:53:40 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8023
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:43:30 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #8022
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:35:16 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8021
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:40:28 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #8020
Re: Changing license to Apache License 2.0?
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:43:29 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8019
Re: Changing license to Apache License 2.0?
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:40:11 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8018
Re: Changing license to Apache License 2.0?
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:55:45 +0200
Attila Szegedi <[email protected]> • #8017
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:25:44 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8016
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:19:39 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8015
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:21:58 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #8014
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:24:24 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8013
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:59:55 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #8012
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:09:20 +0800
Greg Amerson <[email protected]> • #8011
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:54:48 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8010
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:41:55 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #8009
User-defined language setting for Notepad++
Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:33:48 +0000
"Wang, Glenn" <[email protected]> • #8008
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Sat, 13 Jul 2013 15:09:04 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8007
Re: [Freemarker-devel] FreeMarker 2.3.20 is released
Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:55:38 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8006
Changing license to Apache License 2.0?
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:55:18 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8005
Re: [Freemarker-devel] FreeMarker 2.3.20 is released
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 02:17:58 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8004
Re: FreeMarker 2.3.20 is released
Thu, 27 Jun 2013 22:26:55 +0000
Jaime Garza <[email protected]> • #8003
FreeMarker 2.3.20 is released
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:10:21 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8002
Re: minor debugger improvements
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:56:15 +0800
Greg Amerson <[email protected]> • #8001
Re: minor debugger improvements
Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:45:36 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #8000
Re: minor debugger improvements
Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:55:12 +0800
Greg Amerson <[email protected]> • #7999
access data LinkedHashMap.LinkedHashMap
Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
larosagiorgio <[email protected]> • #7998
Re: minor debugger improvements
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:43:55 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7997
Re: minor debugger improvements
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:28:59 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7996
Re: minor debugger improvements
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:18:47 +0800
Greg Amerson <[email protected]> • #7995
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:11:41 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7994
Re: minor debugger improvements
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:04:02 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7993
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:44:12 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7992
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:17:29 +0800
Greg Amerson <[email protected]> • #7991
Re: minor debugger improvements
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:59:32 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7990
Re: minor debugger improvements
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:22:55 +0800
Greg Amerson <[email protected]> • #7989
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:39:21 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7988
Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:26:13 +0800
Greg Amerson <[email protected]> • #7987
Re: minor debugger improvements
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:04:11 +0200
Attila Szegedi <[email protected]> • #7986
Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:46:39 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7985
Re: minor debugger improvements
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:00:09 +0800
Greg Amerson <[email protected]> • #7984
Re: minor debugger improvements
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:47:14 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7983
minor debugger improvements
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:40:37 +0800
Greg Amerson <[email protected]> • #7982
Re: XDocReport, IDE support (Was: Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?)
Wed, 5 Jun 2013 10:11:06 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7981
Re: XDocReport, IDE support (Was: Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?)
Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:18:03 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7980
Re: XDocReport, IDE support (Was: Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?)
Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:59:20 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7979
Re: XDocReport, IDE support (Was: Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?)
Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:16:28 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7978
Re: XDocReport, IDE support (Was: Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?)
Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:53:17 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7977
Re: XDocReport, IDE support (Was: Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?)
Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:41:56 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7976
Re: XDocReport, IDE support (Was: Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?)
Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:29:45 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7975
XDocReport, IDE support (Was: Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?)
Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:12:35 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7974
Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?
Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:16:59 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7973
Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?
Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:54:20 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7972
Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?
Mon, 3 Jun 2013 01:21:04 +0200
Angelo zerr <[email protected]> • #7971
Automatic boolean to string conversion in 2.3.20. Will this be OK?
Sat, 1 Jun 2013 16:05:37 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7970
Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?
Fri, 31 May 2013 12:14:32 -0400
Raymond Auge <[email protected]> • #7969
Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?
Fri, 31 May 2013 11:40:32 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7968
Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?
Mon, 27 May 2013 10:09:56 -0400
Raymond Auge <[email protected]> • #7967
Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?
Tue, 21 May 2013 12:01:59 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7966
FreeMarker 2.3.x source code moved to GitHub
Tue, 21 May 2013 12:01:22 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7965
Re: Notepad++ freemarker syntax
Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
steenhulthin <[email protected]> • #7964
Powered by Freemarker: PerlWizard - A free wizard for automatic Perl software code generation using simple forms
Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:28:26 -0700
"Richard Bailey" <[email protected]> • #7963
Re: Survey for preparing FreeMarker development effort
Mon, 1 Apr 2013 19:13:23 +0200
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7962
Re: Survey for preparing FreeMarker development effort
Mon, 1 Apr 2013 01:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
jimingliu <[email protected]> • #7961
Re: Survey for preparing FreeMarker development effort
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:21:37 +0100
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7960
Re: Survey for preparing FreeMarker development effort
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:56:32 +0100
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7959
Re: Survey for preparing FreeMarker development effort
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:55:18 -0400
Raymond Auge <[email protected]> • #7958
Re: Survey for preparing FreeMarker development effort
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:00:06 +0100
Johno Crawford <[email protected]> • #7957
Re: New entry for the 'powered by' page
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:14:39 -0400
Raymond Auge <[email protected]> • #7956
Re: Survey for preparing FreeMarker development effort
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:28:45 -0400
Raymond Auge <[email protected]> • #7955
New entry for the 'powered by' page
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:41:37 +0000
Jonathan Bullock <[email protected]> • #7954
Survey for preparing FreeMarker development effort
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:06:24 +0100
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7953
Re: Proposal: <#p expression> for printing values that deliberately store markup
Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:37:54 +0100
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7952
Re: Proposal: <#p expression> for printing values that deliberately store markup
Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:38:02 +0000
Denis Bredelet <[email protected]> • #7951
Proposal: <#p expression> for printing values that deliberately store markup
Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:49:04 +0100
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7950
Re: String comparisons
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:17:48 +0100
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7949
Re: String comparisons
Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:53:23 +0000
Jaime Garza <[email protected]> • #7948
Re: Comparison of Dates
Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:33:17 +0100
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7947
Re: String comparisons
Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:25:42 +0100
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7946
String comparisons
Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:43:30 +0000
Jaime Garza <[email protected]> • #7945
Comparison of Dates
Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:34:55 +0000
Jaime Garza <[email protected]> • #7944
Re: Notepad++ freemarker syntax
Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:51:08 +0100
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> • #7943
Re: Notepad++ freemarker syntax
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:36:39 -0800 (PST)
steenhulthin <[email protected]> • #7942
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.