gmane.comp.web.services.description archive

380 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

AW: Web Services Description Working Group is now closed
Tue, 3 Jul 2007 07:51:32 +0200
"Boffo, Marcel" <[email protected]> • #6413
RE: Web Services Description Working Group is now closed
Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:39:21 -0700
"Tom Jordahl" <[email protected]> • #6412
Web Services Description Working Group is now closed
Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:24:00 +0000
Philippe Le Hegaret <[email protected]> • #6411
FW: News Release: W3C Completes Work on Critical Web Services Standard, WSDL 2.0
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:05:07 -0400
"Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <[email protected]> • #6410
RE: Future of WSDL2 test-suite, CVS, errata, etc.
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:24:49 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6409
Future of WSDL2 test-suite, CVS, errata, etc.
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:07:41 +0100
"John Kaputin (gmail)" <[email protected]> • #6408
Re: [Bug 4736] Make RDF available through WSDL-related URIs
Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:59:53 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6407
[Bug 4736] Make RDF available through WSDL-related URIs
Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:19:50 +0000
[email protected] • #6406
Re: unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid
Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:56:46 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6405
Re: unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid
Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:50:09 +0000
Philippe Le Hegaret <[email protected]> • #6404
Re: Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks
Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:54:52 -0400
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> • #6403
Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:01:09 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6402
[Bug 4590] References
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:30:51 +0000
[email protected] • #6401
EASE 2007 Call for Papers
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:46:25 +0900
"Web Services Challenge 2007" <[email protected]> • #6400
WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Thu, 31 May 2007 12:42:09 -0400
Amelia A Lewis <[email protected]> • #6399
Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Thu, 31 May 2007 17:58:49 +0200
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> • #6398
RE: WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Wed, 30 May 2007 13:46:27 -0700
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <[email protected]> • #6397
Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Wed, 30 May 2007 12:31:04 -0700
Roberto Chinnici <[email protected]> • #6396
[Bug 4590] References
Tue, 29 May 2007 18:54:01 +0000
[email protected] • #6395
Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Mon, 28 May 2007 08:30:12 +0530
Sanjiva Weerawarana <[email protected]> • #6394
Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Thu, 24 May 2007 06:12:58 -0700
Charlton Barreto <[email protected]> • #6393
RE: WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Thu, 24 May 2007 06:02:47 -0700
"Charlton Barreto" <[email protected]> • #6392
Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Wed, 23 May 2007 23:47:19 -0400
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> • #6391
Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Wed, 23 May 2007 20:00:49 -0700
"Ramkumar Menon" <[email protected]> • #6390
Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Wed, 23 May 2007 18:45:22 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6389
WSDL 2.0 is PR!
Wed, 23 May 2007 08:23:26 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6388
Re: Two Questions on Extension Components in WSDL 2.0
Tue, 22 May 2007 18:36:26 -0400
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> • #6387
Two Questions on Extension Components in WSDL 2.0
Mon, 21 May 2007 11:39:38 -0700
"Ramkumar Menon" <[email protected]> • #6386
Re: [Bug 4380] Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042
Mon, 21 May 2007 14:37:48 -0400
Amelia A Lewis <[email protected]> • #6385
Re: [Bug 4380] Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042
Mon, 21 May 2007 11:04:17 -0700
"Ramkumar Menon" <[email protected]> • #6384
issue 289 considerations
Sun, 20 May 2007 18:17:48 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6383
WSDL RDF mapping implementation
Sun, 20 May 2007 16:51:38 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6382
Re: unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid
Sat, 19 May 2007 18:58:49 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6381
RE: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1
Fri, 18 May 2007 19:09:12 -0700
"Amy Lewis" <[email protected]> • #6380
Re: Location of wsdl20.xsd in Part 1
Fri, 18 May 2007 17:28:51 -0400
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> • #6379
Re: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1
Fri, 18 May 2007 14:21:39 -0700
"Ramkumar Menon" <[email protected]> • #6378
Re: Part 1 -> Table 2.1 - xs:base64, xs:Binary
Fri, 18 May 2007 17:13:49 -0400
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> • #6377
Re: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1
Fri, 18 May 2007 10:30:55 -0400
Amelia A Lewis <[email protected]> • #6376
RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature
Fri, 18 May 2007 13:23:47 +1000
"Rogers, Tony" <[email protected]> • #6375
Part 1 -> Table 2.1 - xs:base64, xs:Binary
Thu, 17 May 2007 15:58:03 -0700
"Ramkumar Menon" <[email protected]> • #6374
Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1
Thu, 17 May 2007 14:38:04 -0700
"Ramkumar Menon" <[email protected]> • #6373
Location of wsdl20.xsd in Part 1
Thu, 17 May 2007 14:18:46 -0700
"Ramkumar Menon" <[email protected]> • #6372
[Bug 4457] Comment on Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0: Primer
Thu, 17 May 2007 15:07:48 +0000
[email protected] • #6371
[Bug 4562] Editorial correction for RPC Signature
Thu, 17 May 2007 14:19:24 +0000
[email protected] • #6370
RE: {rpc signature} ambiguity causes 2 interchange failures for Woden
Wed, 16 May 2007 17:56:20 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6369
[Bug 4563] {rpc signature} ambiguity
Thu, 17 May 2007 00:48:01 +0000
[email protected] • #6368
RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature
Wed, 16 May 2007 17:30:29 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6367
[Bug 4562] Editorial correction for RPC Signature
Thu, 17 May 2007 00:29:41 +0000
[email protected] • #6366
{rpc signature} ambiguity causes 2 interchange failures for Woden
Mon, 14 May 2007 15:51:57 +0100
"John Kaputin (gmail)" <[email protected]> • #6365
Editorial correction for RPC Signature
Mon, 14 May 2007 13:42:19 +0100
"John Kaputin (gmail)" <[email protected]> • #6364
Re: [authors] Call for papers -- GSEM2007: Paper submission still open!!!!!
Mon, 14 May 2007 13:07:41 +0200
Rainer Unland <[email protected]> • #6363
CfP: SemDeskEng2007: ESEC/FSE 2007 Workshop on Engineering the Semantic Desktop
Mon, 14 May 2007 11:39:29 +0100
Siegfried Handschuh <[email protected]> • #6362
Call for papers -- GSEM2007
Mon, 14 May 2007 20:28:36 +1000
"Jinjun Chen" <jchen-TjfQEmExqbPX/[email protected]> • #6361
[Bug 4550] Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar?
Thu, 10 May 2007 15:45:25 +0000
[email protected] • #6360
Minutes, 10 May 2007 WS Description WG telcon
Thu, 10 May 2007 08:37:11 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6359
[Bug 4550] Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar?
Thu, 10 May 2007 15:15:36 +0000
[email protected] • #6358
Regrets for 5/10 telcon
Thu, 10 May 2007 06:59:02 -0700
"Charlton Barreto" <[email protected]> • #6357
FlickrClient Updated
Thu, 10 May 2007 11:21:35 +0530
"keith chapman" <[email protected]> • #6356
Agenda: 10 May 2007 WS Description telcon
Wed, 9 May 2007 20:53:41 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6355
[Bug 4550] Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar?
Thu, 10 May 2007 03:50:40 +0000
[email protected] • #6354
RE: Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar?
Tue, 8 May 2007 20:37:59 -0400
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> • #6353
RE: Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar?
Tue, 8 May 2007 11:13:58 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6352
Re: Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar?
Tue, 8 May 2007 17:02:26 +0100
"John Kaputin (gmail)" <[email protected]> • #6351
Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar?
Fri, 4 May 2007 17:45:14 +0100
"John Kaputin (gmail)" <[email protected]> • #6350
Re: extensions in WSDL CM, in Woden
Fri, 4 May 2007 09:48:52 +0100
"John Kaputin (gmail)" <[email protected]> • #6349
RE: test suite bug
Thu, 3 May 2007 14:44:50 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6348
extensions in WSDL CM, in Woden
Thu, 03 May 2007 19:36:16 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6347
Re: a few Woden problems
Thu, 3 May 2007 17:49:05 +0100
"John Kaputin (gmail)" <[email protected]> • #6346
test suite bug
Thu, 03 May 2007 17:21:32 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6345
Re: a few Woden problems
Thu, 03 May 2007 00:07:24 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6344
Re: a few Woden problems
Wed, 02 May 2007 23:57:49 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6343
Re: a few Woden problems
Wed, 02 May 2007 23:50:47 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6342
Re: unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid
Wed, 2 May 2007 16:11:29 -0400
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> • #6341
Re: a few Woden problems
Wed, 2 May 2007 16:02:45 -0400
Lawrence Mandel <[email protected]> • #6340
Re: a few Woden problems
Wed, 2 May 2007 15:56:26 -0400
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> • #6339
Re: a few Woden problems
Wed, 2 May 2007 15:56:26 -0400
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> • #6338
a few Woden problems
Wed, 02 May 2007 20:42:24 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6337
unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid
Wed, 02 May 2007 20:11:52 +0200
Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> • #6336
FW: [ANN]Axis2 1.2 Released
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:18:47 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6335
Call for papers -- GSEM2007
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:51:39 +1000
"Jinjun Chen" <jchen-TjfQEmExqbPX/[email protected]> • #6334
RE: WSDL WG Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:09:08 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6333
Minutes, 26 April 2007 WS Description WG telcon
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:00:27 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6332
[Bug 4492] Canonical fragments and targetNamespace
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:35:18 +0000
[email protected] • #6331
[Bug 4493] Wrong prefix in canonical fragment id example
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:34:17 +0000
[email protected] • #6330
[Bug 4492] Canonical fragments and targetNamespace
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:33:14 +0000
[email protected] • #6329
[Bug 4491] Proposal to Include whttp:code to the output of the binding operation
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:33:42 +0000
[email protected] • #6328
Re: Schema file names for wsdl-extensions seem inconsistent
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:56:29 -0400
Philippe Le Hegaret <[email protected]> • #6327
[Bug 4457] Comment on Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0: Primer
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:31:59 +0000
[email protected] • #6326
[Bug 4436] Redundancy in Section 4.1 RPC style.
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:12:19 +0000
[email protected] • #6325
[Bug 4435] Reorg Section 4.1 RPC style.
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:12:01 +0000
[email protected] • #6324
[Bug 4422] Encoding '='?
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:11:39 +0000
[email protected] • #6323
[Bug 4468] Missing "not" in 6.4.6 HTTP Request IRI
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:11:14 +0000
[email protected] • #6322
[Bug 4431] Definnition of equivalent value.
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:01:53 +0000
[email protected] • #6321
[Bug 4434] Relocate Example 6-1.
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:01:33 +0000
[email protected] • #6320
[Bug 4430] Endpoint address ? and # note
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:01:16 +0000
[email protected] • #6319
[Bug 4427] Multiple namespace clarification
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:00:55 +0000
[email protected] • #6318
[Bug 4381] Proposal for Binding-0055 and Binding-1207001
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:00:02 +0000
[email protected] • #6317
[Bug 4421] Editorial Issues - Part 1
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:00:39 +0000
[email protected] • #6316
[revised] Agenda: 26 April 2007 WS Description telcon
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:33:15 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #6315
[Bug 4493] Wrong prefix in canonical fragment id example
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:14:46 +0000
[email protected] • #6314
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.