gmane.ietf.provreg archive

1661 archived articles, newest first (page 14 of 17). Latest articles →

RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:11:26 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1987
Re: rfc4310bis 03 AD Feedback
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:45:15 +0000
[email protected] • #1986
Re: RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:33:55 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> • #1985
RE: RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:04:51 -0500
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #1984
Re: RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:52:52 +0000
[email protected] • #1983
RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 07:24:39 -0500
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #1982
Re: rfc4310bis 03 AD Feedback
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:37:13 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #1981
Re: rfc4310bis 03 AD Feedback
Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:23:13 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1980
Re: rfc4310bis 03 AD Feedback
Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:59:29 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1979
Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:53:59 +0100 (CET)
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]> • #1978
Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for theExtensible Provisioning Protocol
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:01:28 -0600
"Spencer Dawkins" <[email protected]> • #1977
Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:35:09 +0000
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> • #1976
Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:11:20 +0000
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> • #1975
Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:31:18 +0100 (CET)
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]> • #1974
Re: rfc4310bis 03 AD Feedback
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:15:13 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1973
Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:16:04 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1972
Re: a question for the list
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:10:01 +0100
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]> • #1971
Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:10:27 +0000
Eduardo Duarte <[email protected]> • #1970
Re: rfc4310bis 03 AD Feedback
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:42:49 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1969
Re: rfc4310bis 03 AD Feedback
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:00:52 +0000
[email protected] • #1968
rfc4310bis 03 AD Feedback
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:59:11 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1967
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:15:00 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1966
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:22:31 +0100
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]> • #1965
Recovered from a spam trap:
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:06:34 +0100
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> • #1964
Recovered from spamtrap
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:10:33 +0100
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> • #1963
Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:47:27 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1962
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:41:14 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1961
on-list, was Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:43:21 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1960
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:53:18 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #1959
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:42:35 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #1958
Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:08:55 +0000
Eduardo Duarte <[email protected]> • #1957
Re: a question for the list
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:59:13 +0100
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]> • #1956
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:53:18 +0100
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]> • #1955
Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:53:40 +0100
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> • #1954
Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:33:39 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1953
Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:22:06 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1952
Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:12:06 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1951
Re: off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:00:43 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1950
off-list was Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:24:45 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1949
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:37:36 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1948
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:23:15 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1947
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:31:52 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1946
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:25:51 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1945
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:32:58 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1944
extensions to EPP was Re: Setting TTLs (was ...
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:04:40 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1943
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:56:12 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1942
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:30:59 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1941
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:19:06 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1940
Re: Setting TTLs (was Re: Revision of 4310)
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:09:35 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1939
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:01:07 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1938
Setting TTLs (was Re: Revision of 4310)
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:03:33 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #1937
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:41:21 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1936
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:13:44 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1935
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:51:23 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1934
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:44:40 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1933
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:15:08 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1932
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:06:17 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1931
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:54:57 +0000
[email protected] • #1930
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:01:47 +0100
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]> • #1929
Re: Revision of 4310
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:56:24 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #1928
Re: Revision of 4310
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:03:42 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1927
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:51:02 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1926
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:05:30 +0100 (CET)
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]> • #1925
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:05:46 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1924
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:58:42 +0100 (CET)
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]> • #1923
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:14:03 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1922
Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:29:40 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1921
Re: Proposal for new work
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:03:53 +0100 (CET)
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]> • #1920
Re: Proposal for new work
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:59:18 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> • #1919
Proposal for new work
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:15:04 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1918
XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:09:12 +0100 (CET)
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]> • #1917
Re: Revision of 4310
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:28:28 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1916
Revision of 4310
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:56:53 +0000
Eduardo Duarte <[email protected]> • #1915
Internet Registration Escrow
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:02:23 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1914
Re: new epp commands?
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:22:03 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #1913
Re: a question for the list
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:09:02 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1912
RE: a question for the list
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:58:26 -0500
"Michael Young" <[email protected]> • #1911
Re: new epp commands?
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:34:38 +0000
[email protected] • #1910
RE: new epp commands?
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:06:47 +1000
"Bruce Tonkin" <[email protected]> • #1909
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:08:00 -0500
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #1908
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:57:37 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1907
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:27:11 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1906
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:34:11 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #1905
Re: FYI: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:49:47 -0500
James Gould <[email protected]> • #1904
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:30:49 +0000
[email protected] • #1903
FYI: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:51:05 +0100
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> • #1902
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:21:07 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #1901
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:29:19 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1900
RE: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:18:25 +0100
"Marc Groeneweg" <[email protected]> • #1899
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:12:23 +0100
Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]> • #1898
Re: a question for the list
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:04:47 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1897
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:50:30 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #1896
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:33:03 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #1895
Re: a question for the list
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:35:54 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #1894
RE: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:31:58 -0500
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #1893
RE: a question for the list
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:54:10 -0500
"Michael Young" <[email protected]> • #1892
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:34:57 -0500
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #1891
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:21:37 +0100
InterNetX - Marco Schrieck <[email protected]> • #1890
Re: new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:08:39 +0100
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> • #1889
new epp commands?
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:41:48 +0100
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]> • #1888
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.