gmane.ietf.xmldsig archive

469 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:51:21 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #69
Re: A simple test of XPath filter performance
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:40:22 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #68
Re: CRL in DSig interop test set
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 08:08:41 -0400
"Tom Gindin" <[email protected]> • #67
Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:55:18 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #66
A simple test of XPath filter performance
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:13:15 -0700
"John Boyer" <[email protected]> • #65
Re: Are QNames in Attribute Values Permitted as Identifiers?
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:45:18 -0400
[email protected] • #64
RE: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:38:05 -0700
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> • #63
Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:29:49 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #62
Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:12:19 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #61
Re: CRL in DSig interop test set
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 22:10:02 +0100
merlin <[email protected]> • #60
CRL in DSig interop test set
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 15:14:59 -0400
Ari Kermaier <[email protected]> • #59
Are QNames in Attribute Values Permitted as Identifiers?
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 11:26:38 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #58
RE: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 10:49:14 +0200
"Gregor Karlinger" <[email protected]> • #57
Re: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 02:18:04 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #56
Re: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 14:14:57 -0400
Ari Kermaier <[email protected]> • #55
Re: Gregor's EXC-C14N interop samples (WAS:RE: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!)
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:51:36 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #54
Re: Gregor's EXC-C14N interop samples (WAS:RE: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!)
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:34:06 +0100
merlin <[email protected]> • #53
Re: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:27:00 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #52
Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 07:02:34 -0700
Nicolas Catania <[email protected]> • #51
Re: Gregor's EXC-C14N interop samples (WAS:RE: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!)
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:49:52 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #50
Gregor's EXC-C14N interop samples (WAS:RE: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!)
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:03:32 +0200
"Gregor Karlinger" <[email protected]> • #49
Re: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 05:27:38 +0100
merlin <[email protected]> • #48
Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:08:48 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #47
veillard , Your first targeted e-mailing is FREE
Sun, 14 Apr 2002 05:29:24 -0400
"veillard" <[email protected]> • #46
CFP: 2002 ACM Workshop on XML Security
Mon, 15 Apr 2002 08:16:10 +0200
Christian Geuer-Pollmann <[email protected]> • #45
Re: Next steps for xmldsig
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:40:55 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #44
Re: Next steps for xmldsig
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 04:15:48 +0100
merlin <[email protected]> • #43
Re: Next steps for xmldsig
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:24:23 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #42
Next steps for xmldsig
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:27:04 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #41
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 16:15:06 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #40
Introduction
Tue, 09 Apr 2002 12:44:03 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #39
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Tue, 09 Apr 2002 06:58:59 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #38
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 16:56:17 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #37
RE: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:36:34 -0700
"John Boyer" <[email protected]> • #36
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:05:12 +0100
merlin <[email protected]> • #35
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 15:00:28 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #34
RE: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:33:52 -0700
"John Boyer" <[email protected]> • #33
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 23:13:51 +0200
Christian Geuer-Pollmann <[email protected]> • #32
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 12:02:38 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #31
RE: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:58:04 -0700
"John Boyer" <[email protected]> • #30
RE: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 11:49:28 -0700
"John Boyer" <[email protected]> • #29
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 20:41:58 +0200
Christian Geuer-Pollmann <[email protected]> • #28
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 11:28:28 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #27
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 10:46:08 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #26
RE: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:46:20 -0700
"John Boyer" <[email protected]> • #25
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 18:38:28 +0100
merlin <[email protected]> • #24
Re: New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 08 Apr 2002 09:52:50 -0700
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #23
New Version of XPath Filter
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:39:40 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #22
XML Security library interop update
Fri, 05 Apr 2002 22:52:40 -0800
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #21
Re: broken URL in the
Fri, 05 Apr 2002 21:28:39 -0800
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #20
Re: broken URL in the
Fri, 05 Apr 2002 18:32:13 -0800
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #19
Re: broken URL in the
Fri, 05 Apr 2002 15:27:23 -0800
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #18
Re: broken URL in the
Fri, 5 Apr 2002 11:45:07 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #17
RE: broken URL in the
Fri, 5 Apr 2002 17:24:25 +0200
"Gregor Karlinger" <[email protected]> • #16
Re: broken URL in the
Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:01:39 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #15
Re: broken URL in the
Thu, 04 Apr 2002 17:53:43 +0100
merlin <[email protected]> • #14
Web Interface to SecureXML Signature Verification Web Service Now Available
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:31:23 -0800
"Manoj K. Srivastava" <[email protected]> • #13
Re: Additional test cases for Exclusive XML Canonicalization
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:47:32 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #12
Re: Please Update Interop Matrix
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:21:22 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #11
Re: Interop results update: XML Security Library supports all MUST/SHOULD features
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:20:08 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #10
XKMS Requirements Last Call
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:23:46 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #9
Interop results update: XML Security Library supports all MUST/SHOULD features
Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:20:35 -0800
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #8
Re: SecureXML(tm) Digital Signature Verification Web Service Launched
Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:14:43 -0800
Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> • #7
FW: SecureXML(tm) Digital Signature Verification Web Service Launched
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 09:46:13 -0800
"Manoj K. Srivastava" <[email protected]> • #6
Please Update Interop Matrix
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:16:36 -0800
Nicolas Catania <[email protected]> • #5
SecureXML(tm) Digital Signature Verification Web Service Launched
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:46:55 -0800
"Manoj K. Srivastava" <[email protected]> • #4
RE: Additional test cases for Exclusive XML Canonicalization
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:29:28 +0200
"Gregor Karlinger" <[email protected]> • #3
Re: broken URL in the
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 01:20:31 -0500
"Tom Gindin" <[email protected]> • #2
RE: Additional test cases for Exclusive XML Canonicalization
Tue, 2 Apr 2002 18:39:03 -0500
"NACHIMUTHU,PALANIAPPAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[email protected]> • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.