gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.general archive

381 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Question about compiling the linux kernel
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 01:46:13 +0300
Konstantin Demin <[email protected]> • #20511
Re: Question about compiling the linux kernel
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 23:08:49 +0300
Konstantin Demin <[email protected]> • #20510
Re: Bug#1102295: d/control must not change during build
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:04:56 +0200
Jochen Sprickerhof <[email protected]> • #20509
Processed: Re: Bug#1118589: dpkg-genbuildinfo: inconsistency in dpkg-genbuildinfo vs dpkg-checkbuilddeps in arch:all builds
Thu, 23 Oct 2025 08:35:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20508
dpkg | Failed pipeline for main | 00157d87
Sun, 19 Oct 2025 22:54:02 +0000
Debian GitLab <[email protected]> • #20507
Re: Heads-up: Intrusive translated string changes
Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:25:34 +0000
Helge Kreutzmann <[email protected]> • #20506
Processed: limit package to dpkg, unarchiving 1004001, reopening 1004001
Fri, 17 Oct 2025 05:15:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20505
Re: Heads-up: Intrusive translated string changes
Fri, 17 Oct 2025 04:47:25 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20504
Processed: Re: Bug#1117500: APT package installation is noticeably slower compared to previous versions (Debian 13)
Thu, 09 Oct 2025 06:39:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20503
Processed: Re: Bug#1117500: APT package installation is noticeably slower compared to previous versions (Debian 13)
Mon, 06 Oct 2025 19:03:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20502
Re: Bug#1117500: APT package installation is noticeably slower compared to previous versions (Debian 13)
Mon, 6 Oct 2025 21:00:47 +0200
Julian Andres Klode <[email protected]> • #20501
Processing of dlocate_1.18_amd64.changes
Thu, 02 Oct 2025 02:53:01 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #20500
dlocate_1.18_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Thu, 02 Oct 2025 03:04:44 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #20499
Processed: Bug#1116965 in package dlocate marked as pending
Thu, 02 Oct 2025 03:03:01 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20498
Processed: Re: Bug#1116965: dlocate relies on /var/lib/dpkg/available, unavailable on trixie and newer systems
Thu, 02 Oct 2025 02:39:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20497
Re: Checking out the source repo on case-insensitive file systems
Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:55:55 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20496
Checking out the source repo on case-insensitive file systems
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 20:48:47 -0700
Ulysses Zhan <[email protected]> • #20495
[PATCH] fix: ensure libdpkg fsys-hash is reset on reuse.
Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:09:32 +0800
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #20494
dpkg | Failed pipeline for main | 3e6ab20d
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:20:34 +0000
Debian GitLab <[email protected]> • #20493
癌细胞爱吃糖是谣言?糖与癌症关系大 揭秘
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:34:11 +0700
Liam He <[email protected]> • #20492
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:17:31 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20491
Processed: Re: Bug#1115395: dpkg-shlibdeps fails to find libraries if /lib is removed from ld.so.conf search path
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 21:47:05 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20490
Processed: affects 1115395
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:55:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20489
Processed: Bug#1115292 in package dpkg marked as pending
Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:43:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20488
Processed: Bug#1115250 in package dpkg marked as pending
Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:17:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20487
Re: Heads-up: Intrusive translated string changes
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 17:56:04 +0200
Sven Joachim <[email protected]> • #20486
Re: Heads-up: Intrusive translated string changes
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:45:03 +0000
Helge Kreutzmann <[email protected]> • #20485
Heads-up: Intrusive translated string changes
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 17:04:57 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20484
Re: Multiple orig archives, unpacking to a sub-subdirectory
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:38:13 +0200
Bastien Roucaries <[email protected]> • #20483
Re: Multiple orig archives, unpacking to a sub-subdirectory
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:42:52 +0900
Simon Richter <[email protected]> • #20482
Re: Multiple orig archives, unpacking to a sub-subdirectory
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 06:44:35 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20481
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 06:34:56 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20480
Multiple orig archives, unpacking to a sub-subdirectory
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 11:00:42 +0900 (GMT+09:00)
Simon Richter <[email protected]> • #20479
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Sun, 7 Sep 2025 20:00:12 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #20478
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Sun, 7 Sep 2025 04:11:10 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20477
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Thu, 4 Sep 2025 14:48:05 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #20476
Re: Extending ar format to support large member sizes
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 22:32:45 -0700
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #20475
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Thu, 4 Sep 2025 03:25:57 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20474
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 22:20:43 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> • #20473
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 15:04:01 -0400
Lennart Sorensen <[email protected]> • #20472
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Wed, 03 Sep 2025 14:27:14 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20471
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:14:43 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> • #20470
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for kfreebsd-any?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 13:19:50 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20469
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for kfreebsd-any?
Wed, 03 Sep 2025 10:34:07 +0200
"Andrea Pappacoda" <[email protected]> • #20468
Re: Removing dpkg arch definition for tos-mint?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 04:49:26 +0200 (CEST)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #20467
Removing dpkg arch definitions for kfreebsd-any?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 04:42:45 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20466
Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 04:37:27 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20465
Removing dpkg arch definition for tos-mint?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 04:24:48 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20464
Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for kopensolaris-any?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 04:17:12 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20463
Re: RFC: Consequences of redesign of .deb signatures
Tue, 02 Sep 2025 13:37:09 +0100
Richard Lewis <richard.lewis.debian-gM/[email protected]> • #20462
Re: RFC: Consequences of redesign of .deb signatures
Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:25:13 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20461
Re: Extending ar format to support large member sizes
Tue, 2 Sep 2025 13:37:02 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20460
Re: RFC: Consequences of redesign of .deb signatures
Mon, 1 Sep 2025 13:31:29 -0400
Jeremy Jackson <[email protected]> • #20459
Re: RFC: Consequences of redesign of .deb signatures
Mon, 1 Sep 2025 15:24:35 +0300
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #20458
Re: RFC: Consequences of redesign of .deb signatures
Mon, 01 Sep 2025 13:41:55 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #20457
RFC: Consequences of redesign of .deb signatures
Mon, 1 Sep 2025 13:23:30 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20456
Re: Improvements/Fixes to Dpkg manual pages
Tue, 26 Aug 2025 06:19:13 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20455
Re: Re: dpkg was interrupted, you must MANUALLY *what*...????
Sun, 24 Aug 2025 16:39:54 +0400
Ishtiaq Muhammad <[email protected]> • #20454
Improvements/Fixes to Dpkg manual pages
Sun, 24 Aug 2025 08:51:55 +0000
Helge Kreutzmann <[email protected]> • #20453
Processed: Bug#1078764 in package dpkg marked as pending
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 23:05:01 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20452
Processed: Bug#1111617 in package dpkg marked as pending
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:35:05 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20451
Processed: Bug#1110873 in package dpkg marked as pending
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:35:04 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20450
Processed: Bug#1095231 in package dpkg marked as pending
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:35:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20449
Processed: Bug#1100413 in package dpkg marked as pending
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:35:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20448
Processed: Bug#1026319 in package dpkg marked as pending
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:35:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20447
Processed: Re: Bug#1095231: apt,dpkg: two different meanings for the jargon term "component"
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 22:07:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20446
Re: Extending ar format to support large member sizes
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 10:41:23 +0200
Jan Beulich <[email protected]> • #20445
Re: Extending ar format to support large member sizes
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 01:01:32 -0700
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #20444
Re: Extending ar format to support large member sizes
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:37:24 +0200
Jan Beulich <[email protected]> • #20443
Extending ar format to support large member sizes
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 04:50:40 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20442
Processed: tagging 1088320
Sun, 17 Aug 2025 21:09:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20441
Processed: tagging 1088320
Sun, 17 Aug 2025 18:14:30 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20440
Question about compiling the linux kernel
Sat, 16 Aug 2025 07:39:29 +0000
"maria.shrivinski" <[email protected]> • #20439
Re: Bug#1110696: libglib2.0-0t64: Purging libglib2.0-0:i386 removed gschemas.compiled
Wed, 13 Aug 2025 23:56:31 +0800
Tianyu Chen <[email protected]> • #20438
Processed: Re: Bug#1110461: systemd: FTBFS on arm64 with GCC-15 due to GCS warning
Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:35:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20437
Re: Bug#1110696: libglib2.0-0t64: Purging libglib2.0-0:i386 removed gschemas.compiled
Tue, 12 Aug 2025 17:00:32 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #20436
Re: Bug#1110696: libglib2.0-0t64: Purging libglib2.0-0:i386 removed gschemas.compiled
Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:51:54 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20435
Re: Bug#1110696: libglib2.0-0t64: Purging libglib2.0-0:i386 removed gschemas.compiled
Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:21:10 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #20434
Re: Bug#1110696: libglib2.0-0t64: Purging libglib2.0-0:i386 removed gschemas.compiled
Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:35:34 +0800
Tianyu Chen <[email protected]> • #20433
Re: Bug#1110696: libglib2.0-0t64: Purging libglib2.0-0:i386 removed gschemas.compiled
Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:06:28 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #20432
Processed: Re: systemd: FTBFS on arm64 with GCC-15 due to GCS warning
Sun, 10 Aug 2025 11:01:07 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20431
Re: Bug#1110696: libglib2.0-0t64: Purging libglib2.0-0:i386 removed gschemas.compiled
Sun, 10 Aug 2025 10:50:40 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #20430
dpkg | Failed pipeline for main | 2cf1500b
Tue, 05 Aug 2025 18:00:19 +0000
Debian GitLab <[email protected]> • #20429
Processed: Bug#703364 in package dpkg marked as pending
Tue, 05 Aug 2025 17:55:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20428
Re: [PATCH] Dpkg::Vendor::PureOS: Add new vendor module
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 01:18:11 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20427
Re: Bug#1109499: bacula-director-sqlite3: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie
Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:31:51 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20426
Re: Why does dpkg-shlibdeps look at the target architecture?
Mon, 21 Jul 2025 11:43:49 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20425
Re: Bug#1109499: bacula-director-sqlite3: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie
Mon, 21 Jul 2025 11:41:51 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20424
Processed: Re: Bug#1109499: bacula-director-sqlite3: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie
Sun, 20 Jul 2025 07:47:05 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #20423
Re: Bug#1109499: bacula-director-sqlite3: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie
Sun, 20 Jul 2025 09:45:37 +0200
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> • #20422
Bug#1109499: bacula-director-sqlite3: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie
Sat, 19 Jul 2025 11:40:14 +0200
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> • #20421
Re: Bug#1109499: bacula-director-sqlite3: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie
Sat, 19 Jul 2025 11:06:17 +0200
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> • #20420
Bug#1109499: bacula-director-sqlite3: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie
Sat, 19 Jul 2025 10:31:16 +0200
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> • #20419
Re: Why does dpkg-shlibdeps look at the target architecture?
Fri, 11 Jul 2025 23:58:45 +0200
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #20418
Re: Why does dpkg-shlibdeps look at the target architecture?
Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:11:06 +0200
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #20417
Re: Why does dpkg-shlibdeps look at the target architecture?
Wed, 9 Jul 2025 13:26:27 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #20416
Re: Why does dpkg-shlibdeps look at the target architecture?
Wed, 9 Jul 2025 12:39:12 +0200
Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> • #20415
Why does dpkg-shlibdeps look at the target architecture?
Wed, 9 Jul 2025 07:27:43 +0200
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #20414
Processing of dpkg_1.22.21_amd64.changes
Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:07:27 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #20413
dpkg_1.22.21_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:19:12 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #20412
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.