gmane.mail.exim.devel archive
421 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 5). Latest articles →
Re: [exim/exim] Switch to the native OpenSSL DANE support (Issue #3131)
Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:04:40 +1000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:00:26 +1000[exim/exim] Spec, examples of different lookup syntax: if it shouldn't have read as suggested, it should explain why not (Issue #3216)
Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:51:43 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 23:47:35 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:32:26 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Wed, 15 Apr 2026 03:21:00 +1000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:03:46 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:32:40 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:28:08 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:28:08 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:22:09 +1000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:08:28 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:08:28 +0100[exim/exim] [Bug]: GNUTLS certificate validation incompatible with certificates lacking a commonName attribute (Issue #3215)
Mon, 13 Apr 2026 19:43:22 +0100Re: [exim/exim] read_message_data_smtp should comply with RFC5321 (Issue #1195)
Sun, 12 Apr 2026 12:14:53 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [patch] doc: primary_hostname description should also refer to the apearence of a @ in domain lists (Issue #3214)
Sat, 11 Apr 2026 17:03:46 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [patch] doc: primary_hostname description should also refer to the apearence of a @ in domain lists (Issue #3214)
Sat, 11 Apr 2026 17:03:46 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [patch] doc: primary_hostname description should also refer to the apearence of a @ in domain lists (Issue #3214)
Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:50:38 +0100[exim/exim] [patch] doc: primary_hostname description should also refer to the apearence of a @ in domain lists (Issue #3214)
Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:35:15 +0100Re: [exim/exim] selectable local IP in smtp transport (Issue #2953)
Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:45:49 +0100Re: [exim/exim] [RFE] Tainted search query should require quoting (Issue #3213)
Mon, 06 Apr 2026 14:39:56 +0100[exim/exim] [RFE] Tainted search query should require quoting (Issue #3213)
Mon, 06 Apr 2026 11:11:16 +0100Re: [exim/exim] a wish for "debug_print" in the filters (Issue #424)
Mon, 06 Apr 2026 10:50:45 +0100Re: [exim/exim] a wish for "debug_print" in the filters (Issue #424)
Mon, 06 Apr 2026 10:50:45 +0100Re: [exim/exim] Remove obsolete AV scanners - Phase 2 (Issue #3210)
Sun, 05 Apr 2026 14:32:17 +0100Re: [exim/exim] removing outdated virus scanners (Issue #1594)
Sun, 05 Apr 2026 14:30:39 +0100Re: [exim/exim] removing outdated virus scanners (Issue #1594)
Sun, 05 Apr 2026 14:30:39 +0100Re: [exim/exim] Removal of obsolete AV scanners for #3210 (PR #3212)
Sun, 05 Apr 2026 14:12:16 +0100Re: [exim/exim] Removal of obsolete AV scanners for #3210 (PR #3212)
Sun, 05 Apr 2026 12:57:22 +0100[exim/exim] Removal of obsolete AV scanners for #3210 (PR #3212)
Sun, 05 Apr 2026 12:39:05 +0100Re: [exim/exim] remove obsolete malware scanners - phase 2 (PR #3211)
Sun, 05 Apr 2026 12:34:59 +0100[exim/exim] remove obsolete malware scanners - phase 2 (PR #3211)
Sun, 05 Apr 2026 12:33:13 +0100Re: [exim/exim] Please be RFC-compliant re sieve script error reporting (Issue #2083)
Sat, 04 Apr 2026 22:29:45 +0100Re: [exim/exim] Please be RFC-compliant re sieve script error reporting (Issue #2083)
Sat, 04 Apr 2026 22:29:45 +0100Re: [exim/exim] Remove obsolete AV scanners - Phase 2 (Issue #3210)
Sat, 28 Mar 2026 16:22:20 +0000[exim/exim] Remove obsolete AV scanners - Phase 2 (Issue #3210)
Sat, 28 Mar 2026 15:26:15 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Docs: Improve log selector table (PR #3194)
Sat, 28 Mar 2026 14:43:04 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:21:59 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:53:46 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:53:46 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:38:13 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Mishandled errno in exim_fchown(journal_fd) (Issue #3209)
Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:38:09 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:09:28 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Mon, 23 Mar 2026 09:31:22 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Mon, 23 Mar 2026 09:31:22 +0000[exim/exim] [Bug]: Mishandled errno in exim_fchown(journal_fd) (Issue #3209)
Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:35:57 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Allow multiple uses of options defining servers for database lookups (Issue #3083)
Sun, 22 Mar 2026 11:45:09 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Add current connection count to daemon's exiwhat output (Issue #341)
Sun, 22 Mar 2026 11:14:13 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Add current connection count to daemon's exiwhat output (Issue #341)
Sun, 22 Mar 2026 11:14:13 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:44:18 +0000Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:44:17 +0000[exim/exim] [Bug]: smtp transport outbuffer[4096] too small for XOAUTH2 AUTH commands, causes fatal "overlong write_command" (Issue #3208)
Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:08:31 +0000Re: [exim/exim] retry database / first failed doesn't correlate with logs: success recorded as failure, result retry times exceeded (Issue #2638)
Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:18:26 +0000Re: [exim/exim] retry database / first failed doesn't correlate with logs: success recorded as failure, result retry times exceeded (Issue #2638)
Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:18:25 +0000Re: [exim/exim] RFC 8058 says that we must DKIM sign List-Unsubscribe-Post (Issue #3153)
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 20:00:39 +0000Re: [exim/exim] RFC 8058 says that we must DKIM sign List-Unsubscribe-Post (Issue #3153)
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 20:00:39 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Lookup host name from outgoing interface (Issue #141)
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 11:38:15 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Lookup host name from outgoing interface (Issue #141)
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 11:38:15 +0000Re: [exim/exim] expanded basic variables (Issue #132)
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 11:36:21 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Sender rewrite *after* SMTP incoming checks (Issue #120)
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 10:47:22 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Sender rewrite *after* SMTP incoming checks (Issue #120)
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 10:47:21 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Find a way of modifying header lines (Issue #119)
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 10:44:45 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Find a way of modifying header lines (Issue #119)
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 10:44:45 +0000Re: [exim/exim] make queue_run_in_order to newest first (Issue #127)
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 10:35:09 +0000Re: [exim/exim] make queue_run_in_order to newest first (Issue #127)
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 10:35:08 +0000Re: [exim/exim] change wild prefix/suffix greediness (Issue #126)
Sat, 07 Mar 2026 14:25:03 +0000Re: [exim/exim] change wild prefix/suffix greediness (Issue #126)
Sat, 07 Mar 2026 14:25:03 +0000Re: [exim/exim] change wild prefix/suffix greediness (Issue #126)
Thu, 05 Mar 2026 20:29:52 +0000Re: [exim/exim] a way of making crashes in pipe commands temporary errors (Issue #277)
Thu, 05 Mar 2026 20:16:04 +0000Re: [exim/exim] a way of making crashes in pipe commands temporary errors (Issue #277)
Thu, 05 Mar 2026 20:16:05 +0000Re: [exim/exim] more flexibility for pipe returns (Issue #117)
Thu, 05 Mar 2026 20:14:22 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Check the return value of every calls to malloc() (Issue #1838)
Thu, 05 Mar 2026 18:28:51 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Check the return value of every calls to malloc() (Issue #1838)
Thu, 05 Mar 2026 18:28:51 +0000Re: Is anyone else getting *four* emails for every closed ticket ?
Thu, 5 Mar 2026 15:53:02 +0000 (GMT)Re: Is anyone else getting *four* emails for every closed ticket ?
Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:59:50 +0000Re: Is anyone else getting *four* emails for every closed ticket ?
Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:59:46 +0000Re: Is anyone else getting *four* emails for every closed ticket ?
Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:56:14 +0000 (GMT)Re: Is anyone else getting *four* emails for every closed ticket ?
Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:38:06 +0000Is anyone else getting *four* emails for every closed ticket ?
Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:25:05 +0000 (GMT)Re: [exim/exim] retry timeout exceeded 450 bug? (Issue #636)
Thu, 05 Mar 2026 13:53:49 +0000Re: [exim/exim] retry timeout exceeded 450 bug? (Issue #636)
Thu, 05 Mar 2026 13:53:49 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Requesting DSN on commandline submission (Issue #2560)
Wed, 04 Mar 2026 14:01:15 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Requesting DSN on commandline submission (Issue #2560)
Wed, 04 Mar 2026 14:01:15 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Diagnostic-Code in DSN does not contain user_message (Issue #2685)
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 17:09:29 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Diagnostic-Code in DSN does not contain user_message (Issue #2685)
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 17:09:29 +0000[exim/exim] [Bug]: Mails from new exim bug tracking system (Issue #3207)
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:12:07 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Protect MUAs against attacks on BIMI (Issue #3069)
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 16:38:56 +0000Re: [exim/exim] dsearch erroneously requires read permission (Issue #2916)
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 11:29:17 +0000Re: [exim/exim] dsearch erroneously requires read permission (Issue #2916)
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 11:29:17 +0000Re: bugzilla
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 21:57:52 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Patch: explain the meaning of the number in parenthesis appearing in the log for deferred messages. (Issue #3015)
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:50:30 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Patch: explain the meaning of the number in parenthesis appearing in the log for deferred messages. (Issue #3015)
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:50:30 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Protect MUAs against attacks on BIMI (Issue #3069)
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:48:19 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Protect MUAs against attacks on BIMI (Issue #3069)
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:48:19 +0000bugzilla
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 21:39:51 +0200Re: [exim/exim] Spoolfile error on close should not lead to perm-reject after DATA (Issue #3204)
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:15:09 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Switch to the native OpenSSL DANE support (Issue #3131)
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:34:04 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Populate $spf_domain to easily obtain the domain used for SPF-validation (Issue #3186)
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:18:01 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Populate $spf_domain to easily obtain the domain used for SPF-validation (Issue #3186)
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:18:01 +0000Re: [exim/exim] Spoolfile error on close should not lead to perm-reject after DATA (Issue #3204)
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:15:09 +0000
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.