gmane.os.freebsd.architechture archive
1299 archived articles, newest first (page 7 of 13). Latest articles →
porch(1) tty tests
Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:18:44 -0500Re: Deprecating RSA ssh host keys in 16
Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:25:36 +0200Re: Deprecating RSA ssh host keys in 16
Wed, 25 Sep 2024 20:42:49 +0000Re: Deprecating RSA ssh host keys in 16
Wed, 25 Sep 2024 19:24:54 +0200Re: Deprecating RSA ssh host keys in 16
Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:19:15 +0000Re: Deprecating RSA ssh host keys in 16
Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:20:11 +0000Re: Deprecating RSA ssh host keys in 16
Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:16:04 +0000Deprecating RSA ssh host keys in 16
Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:41:00 +0000Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:15:30 +1000Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:04:35 +0100Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:13:12 +0000Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 03:26:14 +0300Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 02:57:17 +0300Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:21:09 +0100Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:05:18 +0300Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:14:44 +0800Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:55:15 -0800That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:47:35 +0300Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:05:21 -0800Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 01:12:28 +0300Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:04:40 +0100Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:17:11 +0300Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:58:25 +0100Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:41:20 +0000Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:32:56 +0000Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:29:29 +0200Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:29:19 -0400Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:24:24 -0400 (EDT)Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:44:47 +0300Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:35:11 +0000Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:09:15 +0300Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:59:02 +0100Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:24:07 +0000Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:51:08 +0100Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:45:57 +0300Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:31:43 +0200Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:08:07 +0200Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 06:38:50 +0000Re: [tcpdump-workers] BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:03:39 -0400 (EDT)BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 04:05:44 +0300libc++ futures and ports/personal libc++ use vs. what functionality is not to be used in the world/kernel: "import std" and such
Tue, 3 Sep 2024 10:07:55 -0700Re: FreeBSD libc++ , ports, and import std or import std.compat : what if potential ports start using them over time?
Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:14:55 -0700Re: FreeBSD libc++ , ports, and import std or import std.compat : what if potential ports start using them over time?
Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:18:52 +0200Re: FreeBSD libc++ , ports, and import std or import std.compat : what if potential ports start using them over time?
Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:01:46 -0700Re: FreeBSD libc++ , ports, and import std or import std.compat : what if potential ports start using them over time?
Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:54:56 -0400Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Sat, 27 Jul 2024 22:50:12 -0400FreeBSD libc++ , ports, and import std or import std.compat : what if potential ports start using them over time?
Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:08:02 -0700Re: Towards __deprecated in cdefs.h
Fri, 26 Jul 2024 07:58:58 +0000Re: Towards __deprecated in cdefs.h
Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:35:11 +0800Re: Towards __deprecated in cdefs.h
Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:18:43 -0600Re: Towards __deprecated in cdefs.h
Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:57:12 -0600Re: Towards __deprecated in cdefs.h
Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:12:40 +0000Towards __deprecated in cdefs.h
Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:41:06 -0600Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:56:41 -0600Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:33:41 +0000 (UTC)Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Wed, 24 Jul 2024 17:44:39 +0900RE: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:31:23 -0700Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:11:02 +0200Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 23:46:01 +0200Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:29:12 -0400Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:37:08 -0400Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:33:28 +0000Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:08:17 +0000Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:05:15 -0500Re: Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:03:52 -0600Default NO_CLEAN=yes in 15+
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:58:13 -0400Refining KASSERT
Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:35:56 -0400Re: FreeBSD-base update & make delete-old issues
Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:47:57 -0700 (PDT)Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:30:03 -0700Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:00:42 -0600Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:43:40 -0700Re: FreeBSD-base update & make delete-old issues
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:48:27 -0700 (PDT)Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:13:02 +0200Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:04:40 +0200Re: FreeBSD-base update & make delete-old issues
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:32:09 +0200Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:49:57 -0600Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Wed, 19 Jun 2024 23:40:11 -0700Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:18:53 -0600Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:10:23 -0600Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:47:02 +0300FreeBSD-base update & make delete-old issues
Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:37:36 -0700 (PDT)Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:26:10 +0000Re: Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Wed, 19 Jun 2024 18:26:12 -0700Minimum gcc and clang supported to generate FreeBSD binaries
Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:01:28 -0600Re: Kernel device for iwlwifi in 13.3?
Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:13:41 +0000 (UTC)Re: Kernel device for iwlwifi in 13.3?
Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:00:41 -0600Re: Kernel device for iwlwifi in 13.3?
Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:47:18 -0700 (PDT)Re: Kernel device for iwlwifi in 13.3?
Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:28:46 +0000 (UTC)Re: Kernel device for iwlwifi in 13.3?
Sun, 9 Jun 2024 19:38:06 -0700 (PDT)Re: Kernel device for iwlwifi in 13.3?
Sat, 8 Jun 2024 17:35:35 -0700Re: Kernel device for iwlwifi in 13.3?
Sat, 08 Jun 2024 07:34:05 +0200Kernel device for iwlwifi in 13.3?
Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:13:26 -0700 (PDT)Re: removing support for kernel stack swapping
Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:43:51 -0700Re: removing support for kernel stack swapping
Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:28:49 +0300Re: removing support for kernel stack swapping
Tue, 04 Jun 2024 21:23:46 +0000Re: removing support for kernel stack swapping
Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:14:41 +0000Re: removing support for kernel stack swapping
Tue, 04 Jun 2024 20:43:02 +0000Re: removing support for kernel stack swapping
Tue, 4 Jun 2024 22:33:30 +0300Re: removing support for kernel stack swapping
Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:59:24 -0700Re: removing support for kernel stack swapping
Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:23:22 -0700
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.