gmane.os.netbsd.devel.crypto archive

670 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 7). Latest articles →

Re: patch: multiple-request, async-request support for /dev/crypto
Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:39:26 -0400 (EDT)
"Matthew Mondor" <[email protected]> • #277
Re: patch: multiple-request, async-request support for /dev/crypto
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:00:26 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #276
Re: patch: multiple-request, async-request support for /dev/crypto
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:02:02 -0700
Ted Lemon <[email protected]> • #275
Re: patch: multiple-request, async-request support for /dev/crypto
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:38:27 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #274
Re: patch: multiple-request, async-request support for /dev/crypto
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:42:40 +1300
Darran Hunt <[email protected]> • #273
patch: multiple-request, async-request support for /dev/crypto
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:13:10 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #272
Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:31:51 +0000
Matthias Scheler <[email protected]> • #271
Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:47:35 +0000
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]> • #270
Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:38:16 -0400
[email protected] (Nathan J. Williams) • #269
Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:56:43 +0000
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]> • #268
Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:55:57 +0000
Adrian Portelli <[email protected]> • #267
Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:49:12 +0000
Matt Fleming <[email protected]> • #266
Re: Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:41:10 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #265
Upgrading in-tree OpenSSL to 0.9.9-current
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:38:12 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #264
Re: cold boot attacks on cgd?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:24:06 +0000
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]> • #263
Re: cold boot attacks on cgd?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:48:18 +0000
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]> • #262
Re: cold boot attacks on cgd?
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:34:55 -0500 (EST)
der Mouse <[email protected]> • #261
Re: cold boot attacks on cgd?
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:26:32 -0500 (EST)
der Mouse <[email protected]> • #260
Re: cold boot attacks on cgd?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:01:56 +0000
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]> • #259
Re: cold boot attacks on cgd?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:00:35 +1100
Daniel Carosone <[email protected]> • #258
Re: cold boot attacks on cgd?
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:32:06 -0300
César Catrián Carreño <[email protected]> • #257
Re: cold boot attacks on cgd?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:02:59 +0000
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]> • #256
cold boot attacks on cgd?
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:49:18 -0300
César Catrián Carreño <[email protected]> • #255
Re: NetBSD 4.0 sshd: protocol violation
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:51:16 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #254
Re: NetBSD 4.0 sshd: protocol violation
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:17:26 -0500 (EST)
der Mouse <[email protected]> • #253
Re: NetBSD 4.0 sshd: protocol violation
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:39:01 -0500 (EST)
der Mouse <[email protected]> • #252
Re: NetBSD 4.0 sshd: protocol violation
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:29:12 -0500 (EST)
der Mouse <[email protected]> • #251
Re: NetBSD 4.0 sshd: protocol violation
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:03:08 +0200
Alan Barrett <[email protected]> • #250
NetBSD 4.0 sshd: protocol violation
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:01:39 -0500 (EST)
der Mouse <[email protected]> • #249
Re: final -- I think -- opencrypto mutex/condvar patch
Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:27:03 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #248
final -- I think -- opencrypto mutex/condvar patch
Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:24:08 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #247
Re: (almost working) patch to make opencrypto use mutex/condvar
Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:19:24 +0000
Andrew Doran <[email protected]> • #246
(less busted) patch to make opencrypto use mutex/condvar
Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:05:54 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #245
Re: (almost working) patch to make opencrypto use mutex/condvar
Sat, 2 Feb 2008 07:26:43 +0100
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[email protected]> • #244
(almost working) patch to make opencrypto use mutex/condvar
Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:45:13 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #243
(partly working) patch to make opencrypto use mutex/condvar
Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:34:39 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #242
Warning: bogus HMAC providers in opencrypto about to be fixed
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:18:23 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #241
Re: public key crypto in the kernel
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:30:21 -0800
Bill Stouder-Studenmund <[email protected]> • #240
public key crypto in the kernel
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:31:30 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #239
error generating parameter file in CGD
Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:17:11 -0300
César Catrián Carreño <[email protected]> • #238
Re: Algorithm number/name allocation for opencrypto?
Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:48:18 -0500
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #237
Re: Algorithm number/name allocation for opencrypto?
Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:29:10 -0500
Miles Nordin <[email protected]> • #236
Algorithm number/name allocation for opencrypto?
Sat, 8 Dec 2007 08:20:08 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #235
Separate input/output buffers in opencrypto(9)?
Fri, 7 Dec 2007 11:14:11 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #234
gxlsb(4) on NetBSD-4-i386 w/ arinfotek 3011
Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:31:48 -0400 (EDT)
"Brian A. Seklecki" <[email protected]> • #233
JUMBO SALES/BRAND NEW PHONES/VIDEO GAMES/IPHONES
Wed, 22 Aug 2007 06:27:23 -0500
GADGETS LIMITED <[email protected]> • #232
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:34:43 -0400
"Jared D. McNeill" <[email protected]> • #230
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:00:38 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #229
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:31:53 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #228
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:37:16 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #227
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:14:54 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #226
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:32:11 +0100
Ben Harris <[email protected]> • #225
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:23:19 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #224
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:30:22 +0100
Andrew Doran <[email protected]> • #223
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:22:24 -0400
Jack Lloyd <[email protected]> • #222
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:16:01 +0200
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[email protected]> • #221
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:56:01 -0400
"Jared D. McNeill" <[email protected]> • #220
Re: AMD Geode LX Security Block
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:28:08 -0400
Miles Nordin <[email protected]> • #219
AMD Geode LX Security Block (was Re: NetBSD on the Soekris net5501 status report)
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:49:43 -0400
"Jared D. McNeill" <[email protected]> • #218
Re: FW: Re: [Soekris] Hifn support - good news!!
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:17:39 +0100
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #217
FW: Re: [Soekris] Hifn support - good news!!
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 06:44:39 -0400 (EDT)
der Mouse <[email protected]> • #216
hifn(4) and openssl
Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:40:55 +0100
Eric Auge <[email protected]> • #215
Re: VIA ACE patch
Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:18:19 +0100 (CET)
Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> • #214
Video Aulas, cursos em v?deo. Aprenda a fazer tudo com video cursos
Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:19:02 -0300
"Marina Costa" <[email protected]> • #213
Re: VIA ACE patch
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:51:36 +0100 (CET)
Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> • #212
Re: VIA ACE patch
Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:15:12 +0100
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[email protected]> • #211
Re: VIA ACE patch
Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:51:50 +0100 (CET)
Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> • #210
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:42:33 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #209
Re: VIA ACE patch
Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:40:08 +0100 (CET)
Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> • #208
Re: VIA ACE patch
Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:29:27 +0100 (CET)
Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> • #207
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:03:57 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #206
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:41:20 -0500
Miles Nordin <[email protected]> • #205
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:29:14 +0100
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[email protected]> • #204
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:16:22 -0500
Miles Nordin <[email protected]> • #203
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:52:34 +0100
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[email protected]> • #202
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:42:12 +0100 (CET)
Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> • #201
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:38:01 +0100 (CET)
Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> • #200
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:14:10 -0500
Miles Nordin <[email protected]> • #199
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:40:33 +0100 (CET)
Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> • #198
Re: VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:01:44 +0000
Rui Paulo <[email protected]> • #197
VIA ACE patch
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:44:41 +0100 (CET)
Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> • #196
Re: hifn mac issue
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:50:45 +0100
Karl Knutsson <[email protected]> • #195
Re: hifn mac issue
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:24:54 -0500
Jed Davis <[email protected]> • #194
hifn mac issue
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:07:29 +0100
Karl Knutsson <[email protected]> • #193
Re: racoon patches
Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:24:52 +0100
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[email protected]> • #192
racoon patches
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:29:26 -0500 (EST)
"Stephen Degler" <[email protected]> • #191
www.thuonghieuviet.com good website of Vietnamese
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:38:30 -1200
"Dream" <[email protected]> • #190
the good web of Vietnamese : www.thuonghieuviet.com
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:30:28 -1200
"Dream mail" <[email protected]> • #189
the good web of Vietnamese : www.thuonghieuviet.com
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:29:55 -1200
"Dream mail" <[email protected]> • #188
Re: [racoon problem]
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:59:12 +0200
Matthias Drochner <[email protected]> • #187
Re:
Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:39:47 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #186
(unknown)
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 18:35:52 +0200 (MEST)
"A. Priebe" <[email protected]> • #185
OpenSSL c_rehash translation
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:20:28 -0500
[email protected] • #182
Re: Hifn crypto driver: does it work for anyone?
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:16:27 -0400
Jed Davis <[email protected]> • #181
Re: Hifn crypto driver: does it work for anyone?
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:09:45 -0400
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]> • #180
Re: Hifn crypto driver: does it work for anyone?
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:08:02 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #179
Re: Hifn crypto driver: does it work for anyone?
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:49:28 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #178
Re: Hifn crypto driver: does it work for anyone?
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:35:03 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #177
problem with kerberos
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:41:06 -0500
Ryan Olejnik <[email protected]> • #176
Re: hifn accelerator slows things down?
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:57:19 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Matthias Scheler) • #175
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.