gmane.text.yaml.general archive

1414 archived articles, newest first (page 11 of 15). Latest articles →

Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:15:15 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3272
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:04:28 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3271
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:12:35 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3270
Re: What characters allowed in anchor names?
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:04:33 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3269
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:57:50 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3268
What characters allowed in anchor names?
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:56:25 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3267
Re: Comments and favors on YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:20:24 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3266
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:02:24 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3265
Re: Comments and favors on YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:29:37 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3264
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:17:58 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3263
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:28:22 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3262
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:05:13 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3261
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:17:05 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3260
Re: Example 6.23 and 6.24 in YAML 1.2 spec dated 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:08:52 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3259
Re: Example 6.23 and 6.24 in YAML 1.2 spec dated 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:45:43 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3258
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:15:37 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3257
Re: Example 6.23 and 6.24 in YAML 1.2 spec dated 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:53:16 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3256
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:44:08 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3255
Re: Comments and favors on YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:34:16 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3254
Re: Minor typos in the 1.2 spec
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:29:05 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3253
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:20:20 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3252
Re: Minor typos in the 1.2 spec
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:17:31 -0700
Jason Schroeder <[email protected]> • #3251
Re: Example 6.23 and 6.24 in YAML 1.2 spec dated 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:08:54 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3250
Re: Comments and favors on YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:58:45 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3249
Re: example 7.17 in YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:32:42 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3248
Re: Comments and favors on YAML 1.2 spec 2009-07-21
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:32:24 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3247
Re: Example 6.23 and 6.24 in YAML 1.2 spec dated 2009-07-21
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:32:31 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3246
Re: Equality of YAML nodes
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:32:12 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3245
Re: Question about type tags
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:32:02 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3244
Re: Minor typos in the 1.2 spec
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:31:55 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3243
YAML spec patched 2009-09-29
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:31:16 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3242
Re: Question about type tags
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:13:31 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3241
Minor typos in the 1.2 spec
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:37:48 -0700
Jason Schroeder <[email protected]> • #3240
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:25:11 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3239
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:16:24 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3238
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:13:35 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3237
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:45:54 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3236
Type mapping between native data type to YAML tags (was Re: utf8u tag proposal)
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:48:08 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3235
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:42:23 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3234
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:13:10 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3233
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:47:52 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3232
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:29:25 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3231
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:25:00 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3230
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:25:44 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3229
Re: Custom sort order for YAML output
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:38:19 +0100
Sam Kuper <[email protected]> • #3228
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:32:38 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3227
Re: Custom sort order for YAML output
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:30:44 +0200
Markus Jarderot <[email protected]> • #3226
Custom sort order for YAML output
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:56:12 +0100
Sam Kuper <[email protected]> • #3225
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:53:45 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3224
Re: Equality of YAML nodes
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:38:22 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3223
Re: Equality of YAML nodes
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:46:45 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3222
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:22:11 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3221
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:50:42 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3220
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:35:46 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3219
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:53:02 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3218
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:33:38 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3217
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:54 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3216
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:27:57 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3215
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:35:43 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3214
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:07:22 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3213
Re: utf8u tag proposal
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:12:47 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3212
Re: Equality of YAML nodes
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:31:11 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3211
Re: Equality of YAML nodes
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:21:47 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3210
Re: Equality of YAML nodes
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:34:02 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3209
Re: Equality of YAML nodes
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:00:16 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3208
Re: JSON compatiiblity of YAML
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:08:21 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3207
JSON compatiiblity of YAML
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:27:42 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3206
Re: Equality of YAML nodes
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:16:40 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3205
Equality of YAML nodes
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:33:07 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3204
Re: Line break normalization
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:12:15 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3203
Line break normalization
Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:22:09 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3202
YamlSerializer for .NET was released
Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:17:46 +0900
Osamu TAKEUCHI <[email protected]> • #3201
utf8u tag proposal
Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:32:57 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3200
typo in example 6.4 in the 1.2 spec
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:08:04 -0500
Jesse Beder <beder-d0mtIEKrxfl4piUD7e9S/[email protected]> • #3199
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:39:03 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3198
FW: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:05:15 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3197
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:03:32 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3196
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Sat, 05 Sep 2009 10:00:03 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3195
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:22:55 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3194
Re: Invalid UTF-8 - tag name choice
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:18:52 +1000
Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> • #3193
Re: FW: Re: Invalid UTF-8
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:25:41 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3192
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:00:16 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3191
FW: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:32:29 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3190
Re: FW: Re: Invalid UTF-8
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:20:55 -0400
Brad R <[email protected]> • #3189
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:03:30 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3188
Fwd: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:59:08 -0400
Brad R <[email protected]> • #3187
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:48:11 -0400
Brad R <[email protected]> • #3186
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:52:09 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3185
Re: FW: Re: Invalid UTF-8
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:05:03 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3184
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:50:52 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3183
Re: FW: Re: Invalid UTF-8
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:53:36 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3182
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:28:51 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3181
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:51:24 +0200
Gabriel de Perthuis <[email protected]> • #3180
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:53:23 -0700
Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> • #3179
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:25:06 -0400
Yu Feng <[email protected]> • #3178
Re: FW: Re: Invalid UTF-8
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:19:24 -0700
Josh ben Jore <[email protected]> • #3177
Re: FW: Re: Invalid UTF-8
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:14:55 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3176
Re: New invalid UTF-8 proposal using tags and %nn
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:08:47 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3175
Re: FW: Re: Invalid UTF-8
Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:58:12 -0700
William Spitzak <[email protected]> • #3174
FW: Re: Invalid UTF-8
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:16:03 -0400
"BlueGM" <[email protected]> • #3173
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.