gmane.comp.gcc.devel archive

585 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 16:11:49 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171656
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 05:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Richard Kenner via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171655
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 13:08:32 +0100
"Richard Earnshaw \(foss\) via Gcc" <[email protected]> • #171654
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 04:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Richard Kenner via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171653
Re: GCC 16.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 13:34:38 +0200
Torbjorn SVENSSON via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171652
Re: GCC 16.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 13:33:20 +0200
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171651
Re: GCC 16.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 13:27:36 +0200
Torbjorn SVENSSON via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171650
Re: GCC 16.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 10:37:43 +0100
Iain Sandoe via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171649
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 09:20:16 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171648
Re: gitweb broken?
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 09:11:54 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #171647
GNU Tools Weekly News Week 49 (August 2, 2026)
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 18:19:23 -0700
GNU Tools weekly <[email protected]> • #171646
gcc-17-20260802 is now available
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 22:35:55 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171645
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 21:21:45 +0100
Sam James via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171644
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 05:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
Richard Kenner via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171643
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 09:28:37 +0100
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171642
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:58:12 +0200
Thomas Koenig via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171641
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:26:51 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171640
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:19:51 +0200
Thomas Koenig via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171639
Re: GCC 16.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 11:59:46 +0800
"H.J. Lu via Gcc" <[email protected]> • #171638
gcc-16-20260801 is now available
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 22:35:29 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171637
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 23:06:45 +0100
Sam James via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171636
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 23:06:04 +0100
Sam James via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171635
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 21:24:31 +0000
"Teylu, Andrew via Gcc" <[email protected]> • #171634
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 23:06:24 +0200
Thomas Koenig via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171633
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 20:00:44 +0100
Sam James via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171632
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 19:55:37 +0100
Sam James via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171631
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 19:17:30 +0100
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171630
[GSoC] Rust Drop trait support in gccrs - Status Report 5
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:44:19 +0100
Janet Chien via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171629
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 14:34:07 +0200
Basile STARYNKEVITCH <[email protected]> • #171628
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 13:06:26 +0200
Thomas Koenig via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171627
gcc-15-20260731 is now available
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:35:22 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171626
GCC 16.1.1 Status Report (2026-07-31), branch frozen for release
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:41:39 +0200
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171625
GCC 16.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:07:26 +0200
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171624
gcc-14-20260730 is now available
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:35:20 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171623
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:26:05 +0100
Sam James via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171622
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:15:19 +0100
Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171621
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:44:17 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171620
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:40:20 +0100
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171619
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:27:26 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171618
gcc-13-20260729 is now available
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 22:35:10 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171617
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:00:38 +0100
Sam James via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171616
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 19:52:51 +0100
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171615
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 19:51:14 +0100
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171614
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:35:09 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Myers via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171613
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:03:41 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171612
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 17:36:44 +0200
Arthur Cohen <[email protected]> • #171611
(unknown)
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:57:17 +0000
=?windows-874?B?wNnHudHCIOS+w7nNoQ==?= <[email protected]> • #171610
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:06:21 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171609
Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 06:05:41 +0000
"Teylu, Andrew via Gcc" <[email protected]> • #171608
GCC AI Policy Announcement
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:11:43 -0700
David Edelsohn via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171607
Re: in search of squiggles
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:14:49 -0400
"James K. Lowden" <[email protected]> • #171606
Re: [RFC] Proposal for tagged_by attribute to describe union discriminators
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 11:39:06 +0000
Heiko Lewin via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171605
Fwd: [RFC] Proposal for tagged_by attribute to describe union discriminators
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 23:04:11 +1200
Flame Montgomery via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171604
Re: [RFC] Proposal for tagged_by attribute to describe union discriminators
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:29:07 +0200
Martin Uecker via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171603
Re: [RFC] Proposal for tagged_by attribute to describe union discriminators
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:31:37 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171602
Re: [RFC] Proposal for tagged_by attribute to describe union discriminators
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 11:18:19 +1200
Ashton Warner via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171601
Re: Compiler assistance with making a C++ codebase exception safe
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:24:06 +0800
Julian Waters via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171600
gcc-17-20260727 is now available
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 02:19:38 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171599
gcc-17-20260726 is now available
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 22:35:40 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171598
Re: Compiler assistance with making a C++ codebase exception safe
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:07:55 +0800
LIU Hao via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171597
GNU Tools Weekly News Week 48 (July 26, 2026)
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 22:33:54 -0700
GNU Tools weekly <[email protected]> • #171596
Compiler assistance with making a C++ codebase exception safe
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 02:02:09 +0800
Julian Waters via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171595
Re: [PATCH v2] analyzer: Model strnlen
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 23:03:43 +0530
Saish Kambali via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171594
gcc-16-20260725 is now available
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 22:35:34 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171593
Re: gitweb broken?
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:18:25 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #171592
Re: gitweb broken?
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 22:39:33 +0200
Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171591
Re: gitweb broken?
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:32:33 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #171590
gitweb broken?
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:31:27 +0200
Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171589
Re: GCC repo is locked?
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 11:39:21 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171588
Re: GCC repo is locked?
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:09:46 +0100
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171587
Re: in search of squiggles
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:17:46 -0400
Lewis Hyatt via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171586
gcc-15-20260724 is now available
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:35:23 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171585
Re: GCC repo is locked?
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:06:46 +0200
Mikael Morin via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171584
Re: GCC repo is locked?
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:01:24 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #171583
Re: GCC repo is locked?
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 04:44:54 +0800
"H.J. Lu via Gcc" <[email protected]> • #171582
Re: GCC repo is locked?
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:29:33 +0200
Mikael Morin via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171581
Re: GCC repo is locked?
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:28:55 -0700
Andrew Pinski via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171580
Re: GCC repo is locked?
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:21:38 +0200
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #171579
GCC repo is locked?
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 04:00:12 +0800
"H.J. Lu via Gcc" <[email protected]> • #171578
Re: RFC: C preprocessor extension: Multiline/block macro definition
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:08:27 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Myers via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171577
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:02:35 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Myers via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171576
Re: RFC: C preprocessor extension: Multiline/block macro definition
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:07:06 +0200
Alvaro Saez via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171575
RFC: C preprocessor extension: Multiline/block macro definition
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:03:12 +0200
NomagnoIsNotDead via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171574
LAST REMINDER: CFP deadline for LPC Toolchains Track is today
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:12:35 +0200
"Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc" <[email protected]> • #171573
gcc-14-20260723 is now available
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:35:25 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171572
Re: Fw: Any plans to integrate just binutils ‑gdb into GCC?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 05:14:12 +0000
unlvsur unlvsur <[email protected]> • #171571
Re: Fw: Any plans to integrate just binutils ‑gdb into GCC?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 05:00:25 +0000
unlvsur unlvsur <[email protected]> • #171570
in search of squiggles
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:58:41 -0400
"James K. Lowden" <[email protected]> • #171569
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:49:30 +0200
Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]> • #171568
gcc-13-20260722 is now available
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:35:11 +0000
GCC Administrator via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171567
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:49:00 +0200
Martin Uecker via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171566
Re: Fw: Any plans to integrate j ust binutils‑gdb into GCC?
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 05:46:54 -0500
Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]> • #171565
Fw: Any plans to integrate just binutils‑gd b into GCC?
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:17:31 +0000
unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc-help <[email protected]> • #171564
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:16:18 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171563
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:31:19 +0200
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171562
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:06:58 +0200
Richard Biener via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171561
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:59:27 +0200
Martin Uecker via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171560
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:28:56 +0200
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc <[email protected]> • #171559
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:54:47 +0200
Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]> • #171558
Re: Gradual 'tree' typing and C++
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:15:44 +0200
Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]> • #171557
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.