gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel archive

29349 archived articles, newest first (page 173 of 294). Latest articles →

Re: AW: MMS status.
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:51:19 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12172
AW: MMS status.
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:16:55 +0100
Jörg Pommnitz <[email protected]> • #12171
[BUG] varargs on PowerPC and S390
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:12:45 +0100
"Jacob Vennervald Madsen" <[email protected]> • #12170
[BUG] include directive
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:13:23 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12169
[ANN] feature freeze!
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:01:51 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12168
[FYI] changes in dlr.[hc] and new mysql-connection groups
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:16:23 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12167
Concatenation
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:33:30 +0200
"Anders Lindh" <[email protected]> • #12166
RE: [PATCH] Resubmit: dlr.c logic to remove old DLRs
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 11:23:07 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12165
Re: [PATCH] Resubmit: dlr.c logic to remove old DLRs
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:13:36 -0300
Andreas Fink <[email protected]> • #12164
Re: MMS status.
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 20:12:28 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12163
MMS status.
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 17:03:25 +0100 (CET)
Stefan Cars <[email protected]> • #12162
Re: concatenated msg prob
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 03:31:28 +0000
Bruno David Simões Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #12161
Re: PID bug?
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 03:23:59 -0000
"Bruno David Rodrigues" <[email protected]> • #12160
PID bug?
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:54:15 +0100
"Steve Rapaport" <[email protected]> • #12159
Re: Bug with get-url
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:35:55 -0000
"Bruno David Rodrigues" <[email protected]> • #12158
Re: [PATCH] Resubmit: dlr.c logic to remove old DLRs
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:15:48 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12157
Re: Bug with get-url
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:42:29 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12156
[FYI] re-beautified gw/smsc_at2.c
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:30:06 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12155
Re: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:09:33 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12154
Re: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:44:24 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12153
Re: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:33:09 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12152
Re: [Patch] Resubmit: Timestamp patch to AT2
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:06:33 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12151
Re: [PATCH] Local address patch
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:12:52 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12150
userguide.xml and mandatory config directives
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:56:23 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12149
Re: [PATCH] Local address patch
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:48:31 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12148
Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:06:34 +0200
Richard Braakman <[email protected]> • #12147
Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:02:17 +0200
Richard Braakman <[email protected]> • #12146
Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:10:46 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12145
PATCH for SMPP (was Re: sending too fast to SMPP SMSC?)
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:16:47 +1100
Benjamin Lee <[email protected]> • #12144
Re: concatenated msg prob
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 02:04:33 -0300
Andreas Fink <[email protected]> • #12143
concatenated msg prob
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:33:32 +0530
"Chirag" <[email protected]> • #12142
Re: sending too fast to SMPP SMSC?
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:23:30 +1100
Benjamin Lee <[email protected]> • #12141
Re: [PATCH] Local address patch
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 20:09:31 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12140
RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 21:02:38 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12139
Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:26:24 -0300
Andreas Fink <[email protected]> • #12138
[PATCH] Local address patch
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 17:55:02 -0000
"Simon Beale" <[email protected]> • #12137
AW: some important questions regarding kannel scalability
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:50:44 +0100
"Büttner, Björn, VIS-MWAS" <[email protected]> • #12136
Re: some important questions regarding kannel scalability
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:09:38 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12135
some important questions regarding kannel scalability
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 17:19:27 +0100
"Bjoern Buettner" <[email protected]> • #12134
RE: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:21:53 -0600 (CST)
Alex Judd <[email protected]> • #12133
AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:02:42 +0100
"Bjoern Buettner" <[email protected]> • #12132
RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:53:43 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12131
RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:46:37 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12130
Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:13:19 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12129
Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:10:49 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12128
Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:05:51 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12127
AW: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:58:22 +0100
"Bjoern Buettner" <[email protected]> • #12126
RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:40:27 +0200 (EET)
Kalle Marjola <[email protected]> • #12125
AW: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:41:27 +0100
"Bjoern Buettner" <[email protected]> • #12124
RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:06:39 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12123
RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:01:57 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12122
Re: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:48:36 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12121
Re: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:39:21 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12120
Rif: RE: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:37:46 CET
<[email protected]> • #12119
Re: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:33:43 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12118
RE: [BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:36:44 -0000
"Paul Keogh" <[email protected]> • #12117
[BUG] list implementation too slow.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:16:29 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12116
RE: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:07:38 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12115
Re: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:00:58 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12114
Re: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:56:52 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12113
Re: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:50:21 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12112
RE: Problems with concatenated sms messages.
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 07:27:55 +0000 (GMT)
Kita Ndara <[email protected]> • #12111
Re: sending too fast to SMPP SMSC?
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:43:56 +1100
Benjamin Lee <[email protected]> • #12110
AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:39:07 +0100
"Bjoern Buettner" <[email protected]> • #12109
RE: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:53:48 -0300
Andreas Fink <[email protected]> • #12108
Re: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:46:16 -0300
Andreas Fink <[email protected]> • #12107
RE: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:44:11 +0100
"Angel Fradejas" <[email protected]> • #12106
Re: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:33:57 +0200
Peter Löfman <[email protected]> • #12105
RE: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:03:00 +0200
"Anders Lindh" <[email protected]> • #12104
RE: msg->sms.smsc_id versus cfg_get(grp, octstr_imm("smsc-id"))
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:58:45 -0600 (CST)
Alex Judd <[email protected]> • #12103
RE: [RFC] feature freeze?!
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:44:49 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12102
DLR bugs..
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:33:25 +0100 (CET)
Stefan Cars <[email protected]> • #12101
Re: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:11:16 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12100
AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 17:57:14 +0100
"Bjoern Buettner" <[email protected]> • #12099
[RFC] feature freeze?!
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 17:54:12 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12098
RE: msg->sms.smsc_id versus cfg_get(grp, octstr_imm("smsc-id"))
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 17:27:37 +0100
"Angel Fradejas" <[email protected]> • #12097
Re: msg->sms.smsc_id versus cfg_get(grp, octstr_imm("smsc-id"))
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:24:35 -0000
"Bruno David Rodrigues" <[email protected]> • #12096
msg->sms.smsc_id versus cfg_get(grp, octstr_imm("smsc-id"))
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 10:17:00 -0600 (CST)
Alex Judd <[email protected]> • #12095
RE: Problems with concatenated sms messages.
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:10:39 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12094
Additional [bug] /cgi-bin/sendsms?smsc=
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 07:04:00 -0600 (CST)
Alex Judd <[email protected]> • #12093
RE: +CMS ERROR : 111
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:49:58 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12092
RE: Problems with concatenated sms messages.
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:45:29 +0000 (GMT)
Kita Ndara <[email protected]> • #12091
RE: Problems with concatenated sms messages.
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:28:28 +0200
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]> • #12090
Re: sending too fast to SMPP SMSC?
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:26:05 +0000 (GMT)
Kita Ndara <[email protected]> • #12089
[bug] /cgi-bin/sendsms?smsc=
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:20:59 -0600 (CST)
Alex Judd <[email protected]> • #12088
send logo using SMPP
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 17:41:16 +0530
"Chirag" <[email protected]> • #12087
Re: FW: SMPP PDU unpacking errors
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 08:39:15 -0300
Andreas Fink <[email protected]> • #12086
Re: sending too fast to SMPP SMSC?
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:32:34 +1100
Benjamin Lee <[email protected]> • #12085
sending too fast to SMPP SMSC?
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:29:26 +0000 (GMT)
Kita Ndara <[email protected]> • #12084
Problems with concatenated sms messages.
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:25:30 +0000 (GMT)
Kita Ndara <[email protected]> • #12083
Re: AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:46:40 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12082
+CMS ERROR : 111
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:21:13 +0530
"Shridhar Raju" <[email protected]> • #12081
Re: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:49:50 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12080
Re: why my cygwin kannel binary file (bearerbox.exe) is so big?
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:47:05 +0100
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #12079
AW: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:04:15 +0100
"Bjoern Buettner" <[email protected]> • #12078
Re: AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:40:58 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12077
AW: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:48:27 +0100
"Bjoern Buettner" <[email protected]> • #12076
Re: FW: SMPP PDU unpacking errors
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:47:32 -0600 (CST)
Alex Judd <[email protected]> • #12075
Re: AW: Problems sending OTA conf. Nokia
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:08:57 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #12074
FW: SMPP PDU unpacking errors
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:05:38 -0000
"Michael Mulcahy" <[email protected]> • #12073
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.