gmane.comp.version-control.bitkeeper.user archive

375 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Killing bitkeeper history
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:55:17 -0500
Tristan Van Berkom <[email protected]> • #1965
RE: Killing bitkeeper history
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:01:22 -0000
"Andy Chittenden" <[email protected]> • #1964
Re: Killing bitkeeper history
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:19:40 -0600
Mike Marty <[email protected]> • #1963
Re: Killing bitkeeper history
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:21:45 -0500
Tristan Van Berkom <[email protected]> • #1962
Re: Killing bitkeeper history
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:54:58 +0000
Brendan Heading <[email protected]> • #1961
Killing bitkeeper history
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:48:20 -0500
Tristan Van Berkom <[email protected]> • #1960
vim hackers?
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:00:54 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1959
Cruise Control Plugin?
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:19:17 -0500
gilh <[email protected]> • #1958
Re: File attributes.
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:12:25 -0500
Tristan Van Berkom <[email protected]> • #1957
Re: File attributes.
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:42:33 -0800
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1956
File attributes.
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:49:49 -0500
Tristan Van Berkom <[email protected]> • #1955
Re: bk client & repositories not on a web site
Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:33:33 -0800
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1954
bk client & repositories not on a web site
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:11:24 -0600
Victor Eijkhout <[email protected]> • #1953
Same key errors on pull
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:07:13 -0600 (CST)
Mike Marty <[email protected]> • #1952
Bitkeeper/triggers/pre-incoming.user: not found
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:21:06 -0800 (PST)
zahir vr <[email protected]> • #1951
Re: "same key used"
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:38:06 -0700
Oscar Bonilla <[email protected]> • #1950
"same key used"
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:28:23 -0500
Victor Eijkhout <[email protected]> • #1949
removing files from repository control
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:56:08 -0400
Francois Pepin <[email protected]> • #1948
Re: Missing checksum line in patch
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:46:30 -0400
Francois Guy <[email protected]> • #1947
Re: Missing checksum line in patch
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:34:34 -0700
Rick Smith <[email protected]> • #1946
Missing checksum line in patch
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:14:23 -0400
Francois Guy <[email protected]> • #1945
Re: installer running on FC4 not making /usr/bin symlinks
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:56:06 -0400
Mark Frazer <[email protected]> • #1944
installer running on FC4 not making /usr/bin symlinks
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:24:47 -0400
Mark Frazer <[email protected]> • #1943
Importing files from another BitKeeper repository
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:20:34 +0100
Robert Harper <[email protected]> • #1942
Re: delta question
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:24:00 -0400
Georg Nikodym <[email protected]> • #1941
Re: delta question
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:53:27 -0700
Rick Smith <[email protected]> • #1940
delta question
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:35:58 -0400
Georg Nikodym <[email protected]> • #1939
Re: Csetprune Existing Repositories
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:17:07 -0500
Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> • #1938
Re: Csetprune Existing Repositories
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:42 +0100
"Brendan Heading" <[email protected]> • #1937
Re: Csetprune Existing Repositories
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 07:13:13 -0700
Rick Smith <[email protected]> • #1936
Csetprune Existing Repositories
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:01:45 -0500 (CDT)
Bradford Beckmann <[email protected]> • #1935
Re: Xwindow problem
Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:29:04 -0400
Victor Eijkhout <[email protected]> • #1934
Re: Xwindow problem
Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:52:10 -0700
Rick Smith <[email protected]> • #1933
Xwindow problem
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:55:16 -0400
Victor Eijkhout <[email protected]> • #1932
RE: rename files
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:55:10 -0500
"Jonathan Miller" <[email protected]> • #1931
Re: rename files
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:52:30 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1930
rename files
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:50:55 -0500
"Jonathan Miller" <[email protected]> • #1929
Re: list of files added to repository
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 17:35:13 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1928
list of files added to repository
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:25:50 -0400
Gil Hauer <[email protected]> • #1927
Re: Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 22:47:22 +0200
Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]> • #1926
Re: error using citool
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:39:13 -0400
gilh <[email protected]> • #1925
Re: error using citool
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:27:51 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1924
error using citool
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:24:58 -0400
gilh <[email protected]> • #1923
S files stored uncompressed
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:43:26 -0700
"John Wythe" <[email protected]> • #1922
Re: Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:07:56 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1921
Re: Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:02:59 -0400
Chris Siebenmann <[email protected]> • #1920
Re: Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:27:41 -0600
"Eric D. Mudama" <[email protected]> • #1919
Re: Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:27:07 -0600
"Eric D. Mudama" <[email protected]> • #1918
Re: Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:07:45 -0500
Chris Siebenmann <[email protected]> • #1917
Re: Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:53:07 +0100
Brendan Heading <[email protected]> • #1916
Re: Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:00:45 -0500
Chris Siebenmann <[email protected]> • #1915
Re: Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:56:23 +0100
Brendan Heading <[email protected]> • #1914
Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:08:26 +0100
"Brendan Heading" <[email protected]> • #1913
RE: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versionsof a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:54:01 +0100
"Andy Chittenden" <[email protected]> • #1912
Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versions of a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:42:26 -0500 (CDT)
Mike Marty <[email protected]> • #1911
Re: Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versions of a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:02:53 +0200
Joachim Worringen <[email protected]> • #1910
Maintaining 'stable' and 'development' versions of a repository (hopeless newbie question)
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 06:37:25 +0200
Aron Ahmadia <[email protected]> • #1909
problem with BitKeeper 3.2.4
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:47:33 -0400 (EDT)
Ping Zhu <[email protected]> • #1908
BitMover Releases BitKeeper 3.2.4
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:04:37 -0700
Bob Burres <[email protected]> • #1907
Re: BitKeeper to CVS converter
Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:20:45 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1906
BitKeeper to CVS converter
Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:49:20 -0700
"Bob Burres" <[email protected]> • #1905
Re: "Network is unreachable"
Sun, 22 May 2005 15:11:44 -0500
Joel Konkle-Parker <[email protected]> • #1904
Re: "Network is unreachable"
Sun, 22 May 2005 21:30:00 +0200
Marcel van der Boom <[email protected]> • #1903
"Network is unreachable"
Fri, 20 May 2005 11:33:19 +0100
Joel Konkle-Parker <[email protected]> • #1902
Re: Strange problems with a repository
Wed, 18 May 2005 10:31:41 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1901
Strange problems with a repository
Tue, 17 May 2005 16:00:36 -1000
Aron Ahmadia <[email protected]> • #1900
Re: Assertion failure during pull
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:24:41 -0500
David Engel <[email protected]> • #1899
Re: Assertion failure during pull
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:25:58 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1898
Re: Assertion failure during pull
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:09:32 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1897
Assertion failure during pull
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:45:50 -0500
David Engel <[email protected]> • #1896
Re: Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st?July?
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:48:42 -0400
Deliverable Mail <[email protected]> • #1895
Re: Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st?July?
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:45:12 -0400
Deliverable Mail <[email protected]> • #1894
Re: Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st?July?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:26:26 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1893
A case for software patents?
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:11:25 +1000
"Peter B. West" <[email protected]> • #1892
Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st July?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:37:21 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1891
Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:52:05 +0200 (CEST)
Richard Guenther <[email protected]> • #1890
Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:53:51 +0200
"Zeno R.R. Davatz" <[email protected]> • #1889
Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st July?
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:04:35 +0200 (CEST)
Richard Guenther <[email protected]> • #1888
Re: Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st?July?
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:34:53 +0100
Andrew Walrond <[email protected]> • #1887
Converting repositories for use with Teamware
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:36:06 -0600
Shawn Debnath <[email protected]> • #1886
Re: Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st?July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Murray <[email protected]> • #1885
Re: Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st?July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:27:29 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1884
Re: Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st?July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:23:31 -0600
"Eric D. Mudama" <[email protected]> • #1883
Re: Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st?July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:58:27 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1882
Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st?July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:55:22 -0700
[email protected] • #1881
Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:11:56 -0400
Deliverable Mail <[email protected]> • #1880
Re: How to access local BK repositories after 1st July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:48:46 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1879
How to access local BK repositories after 1st July?
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:53:44 +0200 (CEST)
Richard Guenther <[email protected]> • #1878
What does bitkeeper moving away from free mean for me?
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 02:05:14 -0500
Aron Ahmadia <[email protected]> • #1877
Re: So long and thanks for all the fish
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:31:54 +0200
Thomas Glanzmann <[email protected]> • #1876
So long and thanks for all the fish
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:55:23 +1000
"Peter B. West" <[email protected]> • #1875
Re: bkbits.net is down
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:27:54 -0700
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1874
bkbits.net is down
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1873
bk import -tpatch
10 Apr 2005 23:12:07 -0400
Len Brown <[email protected]> • #1872
RE: BitKeeper Download instructions
Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:11:50 -0400
"Scott LaChance" <[email protected]> • #1871
Re: BitKeeper Download instructions
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:28:04 -0800
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1870
Re: bk check speed
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:44:27 -0800
[email protected] (Larry McVoy) • #1869
bk check speed
25 Mar 2005 12:38:24 -0500
Len Brown <[email protected]> • #1868
Re: identical changes conflict
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:22:24 -0500
Deliverable Mail <[email protected]> • #1867
identical changes conflict
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:56:33 -0500
Deliverable Mail <[email protected]> • #1866
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.