gmane.comp.video.transcode.devel archive

377 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:27:42 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4832
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:16:41 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4831
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:50:06 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4830
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:39:33 +0100
Jörn Reder <[email protected]> • #4829
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:30:29 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4828
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:50:12 +0100
Jörn Reder <[email protected]> • #4827
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:20:26 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4826
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:55:43 +0100
Jörn Reder <[email protected]> • #4825
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:43:05 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4824
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:07:39 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4823
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:26:23 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4822
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:49:08 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4821
Re: CVS migration to Mercurial
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:39:29 +0100
Jörn Reder <[email protected]> • #4820
CVS migration to Mercurial
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:07:39 +0100
Jörn Reder <[email protected]> • #4819
Re: new year, new repo, new roadmap
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:27:48 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4818
Re: new year, new repo, new roadmap
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:58:42 +0100
Jörn Reder <[email protected]> • #4817
Re: new year, new repo, new roadmap
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:35:40 -0800
Phil Ehrens <[email protected]> • #4816
Re: new year, new repo, new roadmap
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:35:28 +0100
Jörn Reder <[email protected]> • #4815
Re: new year, new repo, new roadmap
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:20:25 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4814
Re: new year, new repo, new roadmap
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:35:47 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4813
Re: new year, new repo, new roadmap
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:47:29 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4812
new year, new repo, new roadmap
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:55:42 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4811
Re: [ANNOUNCE] transcode 1.1.0 FINAL avalaible
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:08:13 +0000
Jacob Meuser <[email protected]> • #4810
[ANNOUNCE] transcode 1.1.0 FINAL avalaible
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:01:07 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4809
1.1.0 is ready
Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:45:33 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4808
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:18:19 +0100
Georg Martius <[email protected]> • #4807
Re: (Hopefully) short downtime of exit1.org today
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:34:32 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4806
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:44:02 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4805
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:40:12 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4804
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:54:09 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4803
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:08:41 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4802
Re: tcrequant is broken.
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:56:29 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4801
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:22:08 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4800
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:21:44 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4799
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:14:26 +0100
Georg Martius <[email protected]> • #4798
Re: tcrequant is broken.
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:01:17 +0100
Christian Marillat <[email protected]> • #4797
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:47:14 +0100
Georg Martius <[email protected]> • #4796
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:29:03 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4795
Re: (Hopefully) short downtime of exit1.org today
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:07:59 +0100
Jörn Reder <[email protected]> • #4794
(Hopefully) short downtime of exit1.org today
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:18:40 +0100
Jörn Reder <[email protected]> • #4793
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:43:45 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4792
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:39:25 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4791
Re: tcrequant is broken.
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:02:10 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4790
tcrequant is broken.
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:05:17 +0100
Christian Marillat <[email protected]> • #4789
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:47:58 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4788
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:39:02 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4787
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:45:37 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4786
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:07:30 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4785
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:14:28 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4784
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:44:36 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4783
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:34:44 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4782
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:30:31 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4781
Re: some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:37:17 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4780
some thoughts about the new framebuffer
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:06:52 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4779
Re: [ANNOUNCE] transcode 1.1.0 rc5 avalaible
Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:23:26 -0700
William Astle <[email protected]> • #4778
Re: [ANNOUNCE] transcode 1.1.0 rc5 avalaible
Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:24:56 -0700
William Astle <[email protected]> • #4777
[ANNOUNCE] transcode 1.1.0 rc5 avalaible
Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:29:37 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4776
Re: Addendum re: the framebuffer issue
Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:28:28 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4775
Re: Addendum re: the framebuffer issue
Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:06:26 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4774
Re: psu mode problem with 1.1
Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:18:50 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4773
Re: Addendum re: the framebuffer issue
Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:02:40 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4772
Re: psu mode problem with 1.1
Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:31:44 +0100
Georg Martius <[email protected]> • #4771
Re: psu mode problem with 1.1
Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:05:21 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4770
Addendum re: the framebuffer issue
Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:19:51 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4769
Re: psu mode problem with 1.1
Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:26:53 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4768
Re: psu mode problem with 1.1
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:12:33 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4767
Re: psu mode problem with 1.1
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:31:17 -0700
William Astle <[email protected]> • #4766
Re: psu mode problem with 1.1
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:40:38 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4765
Re: psu mode problem with 1.1
Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:48:19 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4764
psu mode problem with 1.1
Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:37:38 -0700
William Astle <[email protected]> • #4763
Re: [PATCH] cleanup option handling export_mov
Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:07:07 +0100
Stefan Scheffler <[email protected]> • #4762
Re: [PATCH] cleanup option handling export_mov
Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:09:48 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4761
Re: [PATCH] cleanup option handling export_mov
Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:32:44 +0100
Stefan Scheffler <[email protected]> • #4760
Re: [PATCH] cleanup option handling export_mov
Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:59:36 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4759
Re: build error: pvm_parser.c expected ')' before '*'
Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:56:51 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4758
Re: build error: pvm_parser.c expected ')' before '*'
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:46:17 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4757
Re: build error: pvm_parser.c expected ')' before '*'
Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:07:58 -0600
Carl Karsten <[email protected]> • #4756
Re: build error: pvm_parser.c expected ')' before '*'
Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:36:34 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4755
build error: pvm_parser.c expected ')' before '*'
Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:37:25 -0600
Carl Karsten <[email protected]> • #4754
Re: [PATCH] cleanup option handling export_mov
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:54:52 +0100
Stefan Scheffler <[email protected]> • #4753
Re: [PATCH] cleanup option handling export_mov
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:21:49 -0600
Carl Karsten <[email protected]> • #4752
Re: stabilization plugin patch
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:28:45 +0100
Georg Martius <[email protected]> • #4751
[ANNOUNCE] transcode 1.1.0 rc4 avalaible
Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:30:19 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4750
Re: [PATCH] resolves compiling x264 > rev.65 and ffmpeg
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:35:10 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4749
Re: [PATCH] resolves compiling x264 > rev.65 and ffmpeg
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:04:25 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4748
Re: [PATCH] resolves compiling x264 > rev.65 and ffmpeg
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:25:24 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4747
Re: [PATCH] resolves compiling x264 > rev.65 and ffmpeg
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:11:44 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4746
Re: 64 bits problem
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:19:53 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4745
Re: [PATCH] resolves compiling x264 > rev.65 and ffmpeg
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:39:06 JST
[email protected] (Andrew Church) • #4744
Re: stabilization plugin patch
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:34:43 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4743
Re: [PATCH] cleanup option handling export_mov
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:31:56 +0100
Francesco Romani <[email protected]> • #4742
Re: stabilization plugin patch
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:51:38 -0800
Phil Ehrens <[email protected]> • #4741
Re: stabilization plugin patch
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:05:32 +0100
Georg Martius <[email protected]> • #4740
Dear [email protected] Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:01:59 +0100 83% 0FF
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 21:02:01 +0000 (UTC)
"VIAGRA ? Official Site" <[email protected]> • #4739
Re: stabilization plugin patch
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:08:21 -0800
Phil Ehrens <[email protected]> • #4738
[PATCH] resolves compiling x264 > rev.65 and ffmpeg
Sun, 07 Dec 2008 17:03:17 +0100
alexander richter <[email protected]> • #4737
Re: stabilization plugin patch
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:13:18 +0100
Georg Martius <[email protected]> • #4736
Re: stabilization plugin patch
Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:42:31 -0800
Phil Ehrens <[email protected]> • #4735
stabilization - transform plugin RGB patch
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 01:11:58 +0100
Georg Martius <[email protected]> • #4734
stabilization plugin patch
Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:56:37 +0100
Georg Martius <[email protected]> • #4733
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.