gmane.editors.nedit.user archive

815 archived articles, newest first (page 6 of 9). Latest articles →

documentation nedit.shellCommand flags
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:30:00 +0200
Marten Jan de Ruiter <[email protected]> • #315
Re: Nedit 5.5 sources
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:30:22 +1000
Michael Smith <[email protected]> • #314
Re: Nedit 5.5 sources
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:25:50 +0200
[email protected] • #313
Re: Nedit 5.5 sources
Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:16:18 +0200
Joor Loohuis <[email protected]> • #312
Nedit 5.5 sources
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:46:23 +0200
[email protected] • #311
Re: changes preferences with a macro.
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 08:35:05 +0300
Erez Amit <[email protected]> • #310
changes preferences with a macro.
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:57:29 +1200
Martin Hill <[email protected]> • #309
RE: colouring line by line ?
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:02:12 +0200
Jenô Balaskó <jeno.balasko-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #308
Re: Antialiased Nedit, UTF8 now a possibility
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:22:33 +0200
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #307
Re: Antialiased Nedit, UTF8 now a possibility
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:34:21 +0200
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #306
Re: Antialiased Nedit, UTF8 now a possibility
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:46:08 +1000
Erik de Castro Lopo <nedit-erikd-GkEtBYYK+uT2eFz/[email protected]> • #305
Re: Antialiased Nedit, UTF8 now a possibility
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:51:37 +0200
Dušan Peterc <[email protected]> • #304
Re: Antialiased Nedit, UTF8 now a possibility
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:16:53 +0200
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #303
Re: Antialiased Nedit, UTF8 now a possibility
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:17:12 +0200
Dušan Peterc <[email protected]> • #302
Re: colouring line by line ?
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:51:06 +0200
Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg-gM/[email protected]> • #301
Re: Antialiased Nedit, UTF8 now a possibility
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:44:24 +0200
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #300
Re: colouring line by line ?
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:41:11 +1000
Michael Smith <[email protected]> • #299
colouring line by line ?
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:49:27 +0200
Jenô Balaskó <jeno.balasko-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #298
Antialiased Nedit, UTF8 now a possibility
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:10:25 +0200
Dušan Peterc <[email protected]> • #297
Re: Question to syntax highlighting
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:32:53 -0700
Tim Hubberstey <[email protected]> • #296
Re: Question to syntax highlighting
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:52:14 +0200
Eddy De Greef <[email protected]> • #295
Question to syntax highlighting
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:57:55 +0200
"David, Patrick (I/EG-711)" <[email protected]> • #294
nedit.org updates
Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:48:34 +0200
Joor Loohuis <[email protected]> • #293
Re: Check out my photos on Facebook
Sun, 31 May 2009 07:37:23 +0200
Joor Loohuis <[email protected]> • #292
Re: Check out my photos on Facebook
Sun, 31 May 2009 09:46:06 +1000
Erik de Castro Lopo <nedit-erikd-GkEtBYYK+uT2eFz/[email protected]> • #291
Re: nedit doesn't properly refresh display
Sat, 30 May 2009 22:10:26 +0200
Emmanuel Florac <[email protected]> • #290
Check out my photos on Facebook
Sat, 30 May 2009 10:58:27 -0700
Narendra Vulchi <invite+kjdmujw5p3pi-/eYsKH2uxv47lZ9V/[email protected]> • #289
Re: nedit doesn't properly refresh display
Sat, 30 May 2009 17:34:54 +0200
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #288
Re: nedit doesn't properly refresh display
Sat, 30 May 2009 17:01:45 +0200
Eric Bouyoux <eric.bouyoux-Umy9UjvE/gtWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #287
nedit doesn't properly refresh display
Sat, 30 May 2009 15:52:34 +0200
Emmanuel Florac <[email protected]> • #286
Re: How to comment out several lines.
Fri, 29 May 2009 08:47:34 +0200
Eric Bouyoux <eric.bouyoux-Umy9UjvE/gtWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #285
Re: How to comment out several lines.
Thu, 28 May 2009 12:30:46 -0400
Andrew Stanaski <[email protected]> • #284
Re: How to comment out several lines.
Thu, 28 May 2009 08:55:34 -0400
dantian <[email protected]> • #283
Re: How to comment out several lines.
Thu, 28 May 2009 22:49:33 +1000
Andrew Hood <[email protected]> • #282
Re: How to comment out several lines.
Thu, 28 May 2009 08:35:19 -0400
dantian <[email protected]> • #281
How to comment out several lines.
Thu, 28 May 2009 14:23:44 +0200
Eric Bouyoux <eric.bouyoux-Umy9UjvE/gtWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #280
Re: Capitalisation command or macro ?
Wed, 27 May 2009 08:36:16 +1000
Greg Edwards <[email protected]> • #279
Re: Capitalisation command or macro ?
Tue, 26 May 2009 10:39:15 +0400
AVKuznetsov <kuzn-Z+4OxV1pPnQgONJHhpZ/[email protected]> • #278
RE: Capitalisation command or macro ?
Tue, 26 May 2009 08:27:41 +0200
Matthijs van Aalten <[email protected]> • #277
Re: Capitalisation command or macro ?
Mon, 25 May 2009 18:08:51 -0700
intertwingled <intertwingled-r9/[email protected]> • #276
Capitalisation command or macro ?
Tue, 26 May 2009 10:25:40 +1000
Greg Edwards <[email protected]> • #275
AW: opening of 2 files with nc
Mon, 25 May 2009 11:09:40 +0200
"Schweikart, Matthias" <[email protected]> • #274
Re: opening of 2 files with nc
Sat, 23 May 2009 10:24:06 +0200
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #273
Re: opening of 2 files with nc
Sat, 23 May 2009 07:44:20 +1000
Erik de Castro Lopo <nedit-erikd-GkEtBYYK+uT2eFz/[email protected]> • #272
Re: opening of 2 files with nc
Fri, 22 May 2009 09:26:04 -0700
intertwingled <intertwingled-r9/[email protected]> • #271
Re: opening of 2 files with nc
Fri, 22 May 2009 19:20:12 +0300
Offer Kaye <[email protected]> • #270
opening of 2 files with nc
Mon, 18 May 2009 10:59:41 +0200
"Schweikart, Matthias" <[email protected]> • #269
Re: Copy-Paste problem on 5.6 / 5.5
Wed, 13 May 2009 09:45:06 +0200
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #268
Copy-Paste problem on 5.6 / 5.5
Wed, 13 May 2009 10:36:57 +0300
Erez Amit <[email protected]> • #267
Re: syntax highlighting in php and OpenMP Fortran90
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:59:53 -0400
dantian <[email protected]> • #266
Re: syntax highlighting in php and OpenMP Fortran90
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:45:11 +0200
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #265
Re: syntax highlighting in php and OpenMP Fortran90
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:21:55 -0400
dantian <[email protected]> • #264
Re: syntax highlighting in php and OpenMP Fortran90
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:59:01 +0200
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #263
AW: syntax highlighting in php and OpenMP Fortran90
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:38:02 +0200
Eng Rene <Rene.Eng-lmuGiF63XxFWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #262
syntax highlighting in php and OpenMP Fortran90
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:21:51 -0400
dantian <[email protected]> • #261
Re: Keyboard shortcuts (KDE, NEdit) confusion
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
w west <sybhs-/[email protected]> • #260
RE: Keyboard shortcuts (KDE, NEdit) confusion
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:01:37 +0200
"Ravenhall, Stewart" <[email protected]> • #259
Re: Keyboard shortcuts (KDE, NEdit) confusion
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:54:56 +0200
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #258
RE: Keyboard shortcuts (KDE, NEdit) confusion
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:30:27 +0200
Matthijs van Aalten <[email protected]> • #257
Re: Keyboard shortcuts (KDE, NEdit) confusion
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:18:42 +0300
Offer Kaye <[email protected]> • #256
RE: Keyboard shortcuts (KDE, NEdit) confusion
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:22:56 +0200
Matthijs van Aalten <[email protected]> • #255
Re: Keyboard shortcuts (KDE, NEdit) confusion
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:04:11 +0300
Offer Kaye <[email protected]> • #254
Keyboard shortcuts (KDE, NEdit) confusion
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:16:03 +0200
Matthijs van Aalten <[email protected]> • #253
Yaml pattern
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:42:42 -0700
Joshua Kolden <[email protected]> • #252
Re: show matching in verilog using nedit
Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:44:11 +0300
Erez Amit <[email protected]> • #251
Re: show matching in verilog using nedit
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:58:39 +0100
Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg-gM/[email protected]> • #250
Re: Motif (getting nedit to work with lesstif)
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:42:36 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #249
Re: Error compiling nedit CVS with patch mp050226-V3
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:58:28 +0100
Eric Bouyoux <eric.bouyoux-Umy9UjvE/gtWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #248
Re: Error compiling nedit CVS with patch mp050226-V3
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:39:07 +0100
Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg-gM/[email protected]> • #247
Error compiling nedit CVS with patch mp050226-V3
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:28:03 +0100
Eric Bouyoux <eric.bouyoux-Umy9UjvE/gtWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #246
Re: Lesstif isn't Motif [was: Dead end?]
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:45:05 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #245
Re: Lesstif isn't Motif [was: Dead end?]
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:48:14 +0100
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #244
Re: Lesstif isn't Motif [was: Dead end?]
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:30:46 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #243
Re: Lesstif isn't Motif [was: Dead end?]
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:11:38 +0100
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #242
Re: Lesstif isn't Motif [was: Dead end?]
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:42:39 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #241
Re: Lesstif isn't Motif [was: Dead end?]
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:02:17 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #240
Re: Lesstif isn't Motif [was: Dead end?]
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:08:41 +1100
Erik de Castro Lopo <nedit-erikd-GkEtBYYK+uT2eFz/[email protected]> • #239
Lesstif isn't Motif [was: Dead end?]
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:29:49 +0100
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #238
Re: Nedit5.5 floating point exception - Fedora 5/colinux
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:44:13 -0400
Lester M Petrie <[email protected]> • #237
Nedit5.5 floating point exception - Fedora 5/colinux
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:14:13 -0500
[email protected] • #236
Re: Dead end?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:21:14 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #235
Re: Scite/Scintila sluggish? (was Re: Dead end?)
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:21:10 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #234
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:46:10 +0100
ERSEK Laszlo <[email protected]> • #233
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:25:43 +0100
Peter Ragosch <peter.ragosch-CB8Jegt/[email protected]> • #232
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:19:28 +0100
ERSEK Laszlo <[email protected]> • #231
Scite/Scintila sluggish? (was Re: Dead end?)
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:51:07 -0400
Randy Kramer <[email protected]> • #230
Re: Dead end?
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:38:17 +0100
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #229
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:47:45 +0100
Peter Ragosch <peter.ragosch-CB8Jegt/[email protected]> • #228
Re: Dead end?
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:27:57 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #227
Dead end?
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:13:49 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #226
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:10:17 +0100
Joerg Fischer <[email protected]> • #225
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:00:01 +0100
Peter Ragosch <peter.ragosch-CB8Jegt/[email protected]> • #224
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:43:02 +0100
Peter Ragosch <peter.ragosch-CB8Jegt/[email protected]> • #223
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:17:37 +0100
ERSEK Laszlo <[email protected]> • #222
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:15:36 +0100
Peter Ragosch <peter.ragosch-CB8Jegt/[email protected]> • #221
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:36:33 +0100
ERSEK Laszlo <[email protected]> • #220
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:38:50 +0100
Peter Ragosch <peter.ragosch-CB8Jegt/[email protected]> • #219
RE: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:45:45 +0100
"Ravenhall, Stewart" <[email protected]> • #218
Re: Motif (getting nedit to work with lesstif)
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:50:42 +0100
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> • #217
Re: Is there an intent to distribute a Linux-x86_64 binary?
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:35:53 +0100 (CET)
ERSEK Laszlo <[email protected]> • #216
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.