gmane.ietf.rfc822 archive

1437 archived articles, newest first (page 12 of 15). Latest articles →

Re: 2822 revised grammar
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:48:20 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11753
Re: 2822 revised grammar
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:59:18 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11752
Re: 2822 revised grammar
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:11:42 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11751
Re: 2822 revised grammar
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:29:21 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11750
Re: 2822 revised grammar
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 04:27:24 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11749
2822 revised grammar (Was Re: Malformed header - what would you do?)
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:15:57 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11748
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:22:56 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11747
CFWS: beaten, down, kicked to death, and still being flogged (Was Re: Malformed header - what would you do?)
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:57:30 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11746
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:48:17 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11745
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:40:36 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11744
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:20:28 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11743
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:32:36 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11742
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:02:15 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11741
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:37:22 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11740
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:58:22 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11739
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:19:04 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #11738
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:23:11 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #11737
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:23:48 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #11736
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 22:15:20 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11735
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:04:20 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11734
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:12:49 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11733
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:54:51 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11732
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:22:56 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #11731
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:00:25 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11730
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:37:44 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #11729
Re: Malformed header - what would you do?
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 07:43:08 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #11728
Malformed header - what would you do?
Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:47:58 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #11727
Re: New internet-Drafts for an extensible Inernet Message Format
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:23:45 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11726
New internet-Drafts for an extensible Inernet Message Format
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:12:15 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11725
Re: OPES and Email
Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:24:11 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #11724
Re: OPES and Email
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:37:35 -0400
John Leslie <[email protected]> • #11723
Re: OPES and Email
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:12:38 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11722
Re: OPES and Email
Thu, 07 Jul 2005 22:51:59 -0400
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #11721
Re: OPES and Email
Fri, 08 Jul 2005 03:54:06 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11720
Re: OPES and Email
Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:26:06 -0700
SM <[email protected]> • #11719
Re: OPES and Email
Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:08:27 -0400
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #11718
Re: OPES and Email
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 00:00:59 +0300
Matti Aarnio <[email protected]> • #11717
OPES and Email
Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:58:31 -0400
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #11716
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:02:29 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11715
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11714
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:03:50 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11713
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11712
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:34:45 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11711
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:06:10 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11710
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 05:47:05 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11709
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:26:35 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11708
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:33:52 +1000
Laird Breyer <[email protected]> • #11707
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11706
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11705
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:02:15 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11704
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:56:42 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11703
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:10:45 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11702
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:15:00 +1000
Laird Breyer <[email protected]> • #11701
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:02:18 +1000
Laird Breyer <[email protected]> • #11700
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:41:02 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11699
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:16:13 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11698
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:03:51 +1000
Laird Breyer <[email protected]> • #11697
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:43:55 +0200
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> • #11696
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 07:02:13 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11695
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:07:17 +1000
Laird Breyer <[email protected]> • #11694
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:00:00 +1000
Laird Breyer <[email protected]> • #11693
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11692
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:17:57 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11691
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:06:27 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #11690
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11689
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:34:05 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11688
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:51:13 +1000
Laird Breyer <[email protected]> • #11687
Re: gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:56:23 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #11686
gzip/deflate compression/encoding
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:59:00 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11685
Re: Understanding response protocols
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:03:58 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #11684
Re: Understanding response protocols
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:05:04 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11683
Re: Understanding response protocols
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 02:40:42 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11682
Re: Understanding response protocols
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:25:24 +0200
Alan Barrett <[email protected]> • #11681
Re: Understanding response protocols
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:24:35 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #11680
Re: Understanding response protocols
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:10:31 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11679
Re: Understanding response protocols
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:38:46 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #11678
Re: Understanding response protocols
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:12:55 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11677
Re: Understanding response protocols
Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:53:02 +0100 (BST)
Philip Hazel <[email protected]> • #11676
Re: Understanding response protocols
Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:32:26 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #11675
Re: Understanding response protocols
Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:20:12 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11674
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:30:48 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11673
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:08:33 +0100
Ian Bell <[email protected]> • #11672
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Wed, 08 Jun 2005 01:55:48 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11671
Re: Understanding response protocols
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:51:54 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #11670
Re: Understanding response protocols
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:39:35 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #11669
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:41:01 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11668
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11667
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11666
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11665
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:18:13 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11664
Unhelpful behavior of many MUAs...
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:05:56 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11663
Re: Understanding response protocols
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:49:02 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11662
Re: *Reply-to* considered harmful (was Re: Understanding response protocols)
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:27:22 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11661
Re: Confusing UAs considered harmful (was *Reply-to* considered harmful)
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:55:12 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11660
Re: Understanding response protocols
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:41:45 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11659
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:44:54 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11658
Re: Understanding response protocols
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 06:35:40 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #11657
Re: Understanding response protocols
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:52:11 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11656
Re: Understanding response protocols
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:44:47 +0200
Alan Barrett <[email protected]> • #11655
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:37:58 +0100
Ian Bell <[email protected]> • #11654
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.