gmane.ietf.rfc822 archive

1437 archived articles, newest first (page 13 of 15). Latest articles →

Re: Understanding response protocols
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 01:13:50 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #11653
Re: Understanding response protocols
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:26:38 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11652
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:06:58 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11651
Re: Understanding response protocols
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:52:40 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #11650
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11649
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:48:23 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11648
Re: Understanding response protocols
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:42:51 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11647
Re: Understanding response protocols
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:04:41 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #11646
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:53:55 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #11645
Re: *Reply-to* considered harmful
Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:35:43 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11644
Re: Confusing UAs considered harmful (was *Reply-to* considered harmful)
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:05:59 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #11643
Confusing UAs considered harmful (was *Reply-to* considered harmful)
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:48:44 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11642
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:21:04 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11641
*Reply-to* considered harmful (was Re: Understanding response protocols)
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:58:37 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #11640
Re: Understanding response protocols
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:40:24 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11639
Re: Understanding response protocols
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:43:19 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11638
Re: Understanding response protocols
Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:36:07 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11637
Re: Understanding response protocols
Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:46:57 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11636
Re: Understanding response protocols
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:08:22 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11635
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:03:52 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11634
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:59:49 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11633
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Tue, 31 May 2005 11:19:47 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11632
Re: Understanding response protocols
Tue, 31 May 2005 09:21:41 +0100 (BST)
Philip Hazel <[email protected]> • #11631
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Tue, 31 May 2005 02:49:14 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11630
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Mon, 30 May 2005 19:30:38 +0100 (BST)
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11629
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Mon, 30 May 2005 19:19:22 +0100 (BST)
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11628
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Mon, 30 May 2005 11:40:29 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11627
Re: Understanding response protocols
Mon, 30 May 2005 19:19:05 +0100 (BST)
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11626
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Sun, 29 May 2005 13:43:17 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #11625
Re: Understanding response protocols
Sun, 29 May 2005 01:55:16 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11624
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Sun, 29 May 2005 02:43:34 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11623
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Sat, 28 May 2005 14:23:42 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11622
Re: Folding of long lines in message bodies
Sat, 28 May 2005 10:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11621
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Sat, 28 May 2005 18:40:47 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11620
Folding of long lines in message bodies
Sat, 28 May 2005 19:28:57 +0200
Jacob Palme <[email protected]> • #11619
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Sat, 28 May 2005 13:31:39 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11618
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Sat, 28 May 2005 16:54:34 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11617
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Sat, 28 May 2005 06:44:32 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11616
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Sat, 28 May 2005 05:07:17 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11615
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Fri, 27 May 2005 23:29:38 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11614
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Sat, 28 May 2005 03:58:27 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11613
Original-* (was: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt)
Sat, 28 May 2005 03:39:17 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11612
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Sat, 28 May 2005 02:49:08 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11611
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Fri, 27 May 2005 20:30:26 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11610
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Fri, 27 May 2005 23:34:02 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11609
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 13:08:32 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #11608
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 12:58:44 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #11607
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Fri, 27 May 2005 09:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #11606
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Fri, 27 May 2005 13:07:34 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11605
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Fri, 27 May 2005 13:04:43 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11604
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 18:03:16 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #11603
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:59:01 -0400
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #11602
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11601
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:57:30 -0400
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #11600
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 08:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #11599
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:39:30 -0400
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #11598
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 08:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #11597
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:17:53 -0400
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #11596
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Fri, 27 May 2005 10:41:43 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11595
Re: SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:42:01 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #11594
SMTP option for DHCPv6
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:04:54 +0200
"Cristian Cadar" <[email protected]> • #11593
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Fri, 27 May 2005 10:13:19 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #11592
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Fri, 27 May 2005 00:27:31 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11591
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Thu, 26 May 2005 18:38:57 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11590
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Thu, 26 May 2005 21:26:39 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11589
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Thu, 26 May 2005 15:06:23 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11588
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Thu, 26 May 2005 14:18:17 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11587
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Thu, 26 May 2005 09:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11586
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Thu, 26 May 2005 17:34:11 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11585
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Thu, 26 May 2005 11:40:40 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11584
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Thu, 26 May 2005 12:08:04 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11583
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Thu, 26 May 2005 12:01:18 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11582
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Thu, 26 May 2005 06:44:38 -0700
Bill Fenner <[email protected]> • #11581
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Thu, 26 May 2005 14:35:16 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11580
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Wed, 25 May 2005 21:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11579
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Thu, 26 May 2005 04:15:41 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #11578
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Wed, 25 May 2005 20:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #11577
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Wed, 25 May 2005 22:33:21 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #11576
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Wed, 25 May 2005 21:57:20 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11575
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Wed, 25 May 2005 20:25:17 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11574
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Wed, 25 May 2005 19:50:24 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11573
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #11572
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:43:48 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #11571
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:26:28 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #11570
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Wed, 25 May 2005 14:52:54 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11569
Comments and objections on MARID-related drafts
Wed, 25 May 2005 05:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #11568
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Wed, 25 May 2005 13:11:56 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11567
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Wed, 25 May 2005 12:31:37 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11566
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Wed, 25 May 2005 10:26:44 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11565
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Tue, 24 May 2005 22:01:02 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11564
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Wed, 25 May 2005 02:22:25 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11563
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Wed, 25 May 2005 01:27:59 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11562
Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Tue, 24 May 2005 18:01:47 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11561
mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
Tue, 24 May 2005 19:52:09 +0100 (IST)
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> • #11560
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Mon, 23 May 2005 13:14:05 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11559
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Mon, 23 May 2005 18:19:38 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #11558
Re: ABNF experts sought for OpenPGP header definition
Mon, 23 May 2005 11:28:49 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #11557
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt
Mon, 23 May 2005 16:36:31 +0100
Richard Clayton <[email protected]> • #11556
Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt
Mon, 23 May 2005 16:09:38 +0100
Richard Clayton <[email protected]> • #11555
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
Mon, 23 May 2005 10:29:31 -0400
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #11554
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.