gmane.ietf.sigtran archive

3511 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 36). Latest articles →

Re: M3UA restrictions
Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:09:12 +0400
<[email protected]> • #9210
Re: M3UA restrictions
Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:07:56 +0400
<[email protected]> • #9209
Re: M3UA restrictions
Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:00:48 +0400
<[email protected]> • #9208
Re: M3UA restrictions
Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:10:48 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9207
M3UA restrictions
Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:52:31 +0400
<[email protected]> • #9206
Re: IP Address parameter in INIT message
Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:10:16 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9205
IP Address parameter in INIT message
Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:53:06 +0200
"Lukas Alig" <[email protected]> • #9204
Re: RFC 4666. Discrepancy between chapters 3.8.1 and 4.3.4.3
Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:23:48 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9203
RFC 4666. Discrepancy between chapters 3.8.1 and 4.3.4.3
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Shmelev Kirill <[email protected]> • #9202
Re: M3UA RFC4666 test specification
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:12:32 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9201
M3UA RFC4666 test specification
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:50:07 +0800
"WANG YUNHUA" <[email protected]> • #9200
Re: [Tsvwg] [SCTP] a small correction in RFC 4960
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:30:48 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9199
Re: [SCTP] a small correction in RFC 4960
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:47:01 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9198
Re: [SCTP] a small correction in RFC 4960
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:25:11 +0200
Lars Eggert <[email protected]> • #9197
Re: [SCTP] a small correction in RFC 4960
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:44:59 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9196
[SCTP] a small correction in RFC 4960
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:06:45 +0530 (IST)
Ash Kat <[email protected]> • #9195
Re: [SCTP] clarification about HB.Max.Burst parameter
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:20:25 +0530
"Ashish Gupta" <[email protected]> • #9194
Re: [SCTP] clarification about HB.Max.Burst parameter
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:09:59 +0530 (IST)
Ash Kat <[email protected]> • #9193
Re: [SCTP] clarification about HB.Max.Burst parameter
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:29:33 +0530
"Ashish Gupta" <[email protected]> • #9192
Re: [SCTP] clarification about HB.Max.Burst parameter
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:16:12 +0530 (IST)
Ash Kat <[email protected]> • #9191
Re: [SCTP] clarification about HB.Max.Burst parameter
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:39:00 +0530
"Ashish Gupta" <[email protected]> • #9190
[SCTP] clarification about HB.Max.Burst parameter
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:13:38 +0530 (IST)
Ash Kat <[email protected]> • #9189
Re: Static Registration in M3UA
Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:49:30 +0530
"Arvind Kumar" <[email protected]> • #9188
Re: Static Registration in M3UA
Fri, 30 May 2008 01:52:51 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9187
Re: Static Registration in M3UA
Fri, 30 May 2008 11:03:09 +0530
"Arvind Kumar" <[email protected]> • #9186
Re: Static Registration in M3UA
Sun, 25 May 2008 02:23:21 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9185
Static Registration in M3UA
Sun, 25 May 2008 12:24:31 +0530
"Arvind Kumar" <[email protected]> • #9184
Re: Protocol Id for Diameter
Wed, 21 May 2008 10:28:16 +0530
Sanchit Agarwal <[email protected]> • #9183
Re: Protocol Id for Diameter
Wed, 21 May 2008 09:36:17 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #9182
Re: Protocol Id for Diameter
Tue, 20 May 2008 15:43:43 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9181
Re: Protocol Id for Diameter
Tue, 20 May 2008 17:12:42 +0530
Sanchit Agarwal <[email protected]> • #9180
Re: Protocol Id for Diameter
Tue, 20 May 2008 05:31:02 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9179
Protocol Id for Diameter
Tue, 20 May 2008 16:42:21 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #9178
Re: Called Party has 'B' digit?
Mon, 19 May 2008 15:13:08 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9177
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331 (1425)
Mon, 19 May 2008 15:07:29 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9176
Called Party has 'B' digit?
Mon, 19 May 2008 22:20:27 +0200
"Lee S Dryburgh" <[email protected]> • #9175
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331 (1425)
Mon, 19 May 2008 10:21:56 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9174
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331 (1425)
Sat, 17 May 2008 05:46:00 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9173
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331 (1425)
Fri, 16 May 2008 18:25:47 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9172
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331 (1425)
Fri, 16 May 2008 14:50:31 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9171
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331 (1426)
Fri, 16 May 2008 13:48:35 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9170
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3331 (1425)
Fri, 16 May 2008 13:44:47 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9169
Re: PGW-STP
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:04:50 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9168
PGW-STP
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:59:22 +0300
Wycliffe Bahati <[email protected]> • #9167
liaison to 3GPP
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:26:01 -0400
"Ong, Lyndon" <[email protected]> • #9166
Re: INIT ACK message without State Cookie parameter.
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:07:06 +0530
"Aditya Sehgal" <[email protected]> • #9165
INIT ACK message without State Cookie parameter.
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Padmalochan Moharana <[email protected]> • #9164
liaison from 3GPP
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:13:41 -0400
"Ong, Lyndon" <[email protected]> • #9163
Re: response liaison to 3GPP
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:35:43 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9162
response liaison to 3GPP
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:33:04 -0400
"Ong, Lyndon" <[email protected]> • #9161
Re: PN2AC transition clarification in n+k redundancy model
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:26:30 -0400
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]> • #9160
Re: RC with IPSP
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:32:04 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9159
Re: RC with IPSP
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:28:59 +0530
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]> • #9158
What are the differences bewteen RFC 4666 and RFC 3332?
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Shmelev Kirill <[email protected]> • #9157
Re: M3UA ASP mode vs IPSP mode
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
sms2000 <[email protected]> • #9156
PN2AC transition clarification in n+k redundancy model
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:13:52 +0200
"Pascal Bouveron (Netbricks)" <[email protected]> • #9155
M3UA/IPSP: can peer IPSPs use different Traffic Mode Type values ?
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:47:13 +0200
"Pascal Bouveron (Netbricks)" <[email protected]> • #9154
Re: RC with IPSP
Wed, 2 Apr 2008 03:56:06 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9153
RC with IPSP
Wed, 2 Apr 2008 05:38:24 -0400
"Lukas Alig" <[email protected]> • #9152
Re: NBAP over SCTP
Tue, 1 Apr 2008 04:37:29 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9151
Re: NBAP over SCTP
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:25:44 +0200
"Ben Davis" <[email protected]> • #9150
Re: NBAP over SCTP
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:55:12 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9149
Re: NBAP over SCTP
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:06:30 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9148
NBAP over SCTP
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:56:39 +0100
"Ben Davis" <[email protected]> • #9147
Re: M3UA ASP mode vs IPSP mode
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:59:29 -0000
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9146
Re: IPSP related query
Sat, 22 Mar 2008 05:02:11 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9145
IPSP related query
Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Mallappa S Pallakke <[email protected]> • #9144
M3UA ASP mode vs IPSP mode
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
sms2000 <[email protected]> • #9143
Re: I have a question about sctp transport address and enpoint .
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:24:50 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9142
I have a question about sctp transport address and enpoint .
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:50:09 +0000
"cheng yan" <[email protected]> • #9141
Re: Doubt regarding ASPID in ASP UP message
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:22:25 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9140
Re: Doubt regarding ASPID in ASP UP message
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:32:40 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #9139
Re: Doubt regarding ASPID in ASP UP message
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:27:08 +0530
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]> • #9138
Re: Doubt regarding ASPID in ASP UP message
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:52:34 -0000
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9137
Re: Doubt regarding ASPID in ASP UP message
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:14:06 +0530
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]> • #9136
Re: Doubt regarding ASPID in ASP UP message
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:46:12 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #9135
Re: Doubt regarding ASPID in ASP UP message
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:58:28 +0530
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]> • #9134
Doubt regarding ASPID in ASP UP message
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
Padmalochan Moharana <[email protected]> • #9133
Re: Optional ASP-ID in M3UA
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:20:25 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9132
Re: Optional ASP-ID in M3UA
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:47:33 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #9131
Re: Optional ASP-ID in M3UA
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:02:45 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9130
Re: Optional ASP-ID in M3UA
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:19:33 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #9129
Re: Optional ASP-ID in M3UA
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:46:55 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9128
Optional ASP-ID in M3UA
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:51:26 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #9127
Re: BICC/ISUP directly over SCTP
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:21:51 +0800
"Adnan Hasnain Alam" <[email protected]> • #9126
BICC/ISUP directly over SCTP
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:12:58 +0300
"Sohail Khan" <[email protected]> • #9125
BICC/ISUP directly over SCTP
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:29:22 +0300
"Sohail Khan" <[email protected]> • #9124
[M3UA] Error code discrepancy in M3UA RFC 4666
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:54:39 +0530 (IST)
Ash Kat <[email protected]> • #9123
IUA TEI Query Request message
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:46:20 +0800
[email protected] • #9122
Re: ????: Re: FW: LS on Clarification of M3UA usage in3GPP networks
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:58:15 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9121
Re: FW: LS on Clarification of M3UA usage in 3GPP networks
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:52:55 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9120
Re: FW: LS on Clarification of M3UA usage in 3GPP networks
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:34:45 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9119
Re: FW: LS on Clarification of M3UA usage in 3GPP networks
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:43:43 +0800
"wuhongjian" <[email protected]> • #9118
Re: Sigtran Digest, Vol 46, Issue 5
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:34:12 +0800
"LI Xinyan" <[email protected]> • #9117
Re: ????: Re: FW: LS on Clarification of M3UA usage in3GPP networks
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:19:52 -0500
"Asveren, Tolga" <[email protected]> • #9116
Re: ????: Re: FW: LS on Clarification of M3UA usage in3GPP networks
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:08:45 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9115
Re: ????: Re: FW: LS on Clarification of M3UA usage in3GPP networks
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:48:52 -0500
"Asveren, Tolga" <[email protected]> • #9114
Re: ????: Re: FW: LS on Clarification of M3UA usage in 3GPP networks
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:21:15 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9113
Re: ´ð¸´: Re: FW: LS on Clarific ation of M3UA usage in 3GPP networks
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:28:07 +0800
"wuhongjian" <[email protected]> • #9112
Re: ´ð¸´: Re: FW: LS on Clari fication of M3UA usage in 3GPP networks
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:50:59 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9111
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.