gmane.ietf.sigtran archive

3511 archived articles, newest first (page 6 of 36). Latest articles →

Rc utilization while processing SSSNM messages
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:37:46 +0530
Shivi Singh Verma <[email protected]> • #9610
Re: SCTP Heartbeat
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:05:36 +0100
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9609
SCTP Heartbeat
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:14:49 +0530
"Srinivas Murthy" <[email protected]> • #9608
Re: Fwd: difference between Sinalling types
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:21:23 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9607
Fwd: difference between Sinalling types
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:34:32 +0530
ACHARYA B <[email protected]> • #9606
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:51:59 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9605
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 04:13:21 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9604
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:16:32 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9603
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:39:03 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9602
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:36:08 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9601
Re: M3UA Notification and Routing Context
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:11:13 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9600
Re: M3UA Notification and Routing Context
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:09:42 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9599
Re: M3UA Notification and Routing Context
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:54:00 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9598
Re: M3UA Notification and Routing Context
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:50:43 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9597
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 06:25:43 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9596
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 06:05:51 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9595
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:01:41 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9594
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:52:24 -0000
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9593
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:41:20 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9592
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 01:54:46 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9591
Re: M3UA Notification and Routing Context
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:27:28 +0800
<[email protected]> • #9590
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2065)
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:27:59 -0800 (PST)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #9589
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:57:56 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9588
Re: M3UA Notification and Routing Context
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:54:47 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9587
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:53:54 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9586
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:44:50 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9585
Re: M3UA Notification and Routing Context
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:07:59 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9584
M3UA Notification and Routing Context
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:42:20 +0800
<[email protected]> • #9583
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:17:10 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9582
Re: Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 01:08:58 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9581
Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:48:15 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9580
Sigtran extension for network management and association changeover.
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:13:08 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9579
Re: [IUA] SCTP RI missing in IUA FSM
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:45:01 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9578
Re: [M2UA, IUA] Stream to be used for ASPTM messages
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:42:48 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9577
[M2UA, IUA] Stream to be used for ASPTM messages
Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:26:09 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9576
Re: [M3UA] Mgmt Blocking
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:08:26 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9575
[M3UA] Mgmt Blocking
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:00:01 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9574
Re: [IUA] SCTP RI missing in IUA FSM
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:59:43 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9573
Re: [SCCP] Return on Error option in SCCP XUDT
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 03:02:48 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9572
Re: [IUA] SCTP RI missing in IUA FSM
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 02:20:18 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9571
[SCCP] Return on Error option in SCCP XUDT
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:43:56 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9570
[IUA] SCTP RI missing in IUA FSM
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:59:07 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9569
Re: a_rwnd=0 - heartbeat messages allowed?
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:21:38 +0100
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9568
Re: a_rwnd=0 - heartbeat messages allowed?
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:56:07 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9567
Re: a_rwnd=0 - heartbeat messages allowed?
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:36:47 +0100
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9566
Re: a_rwnd=0 - heartbeat messages allowed?
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:05:07 +0100
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9565
Re: a_rwnd=0 - heartbeat messages allowed?
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:38:05 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9564
a_rwnd=0 - heartbeat messages allowed?
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:29:12 +0000
Des Smyth <[email protected]> • #9563
Re: What are the chances that SG may not send Notify messages to AS (M3UA)
Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:53:59 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9562
Re: What are the chances that SG may not send Notify messages to AS (M3UA)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:43:44 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9561
Re: What are the chances that SG may not send Notify messages to AS (M3UA)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:09:54 -0000
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9560
Re: What are the chances that SG may not send Notify messages to AS (M3UA)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:32:45 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9559
Re: What are the chances that SG may not send Notify messages to AS (M3UA)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:42:26 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9558
Re: What are the chances that SG may not send Notify messages to AS (M3UA)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:39:16 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9557
Re: What are the chances that SG may not send Notify messages to AS (M3UA)
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:43:19 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9556
What are the chances that SG may not send Notify messages to AS (M3UA)
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:20:28 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9555
ASN.1 syntax files for ANSI MAP messages
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:27:07 +0530
Siva <[email protected]> • #9554
Re: [M3UA] IPSP DE ASP Up Procedures
Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:45:00 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9553
Re: [M3UA] IPSP DE ASP Up Procedures
Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:03:46 +0300
Evgenij <[email protected]> • #9552
Re: [M3UA] IPSP DE ASP Up Procedures
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:19:59 +0300
Igor Fedotov <[email protected]> • #9551
[M3UA] IPSP DE ASP Up Procedures
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:35:12 +0300
Evgenij <[email protected]> • #9550
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:26:55 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9549
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:43:51 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9548
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:47:13 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9547
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:12:08 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9546
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:19:47 +0530
Sandy <[email protected]> • #9545
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:07:51 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9544
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:22:23 +0530
Sandy <[email protected]> • #9543
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:14:57 +0530
Sandy <[email protected]> • #9542
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:55:04 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9541
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:57:53 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9540
Re: [M3UA] Routing Context in DATA sent from ASP
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:31:58 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9539
Re: Should ASP send a DUPU?
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:30:21 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9538
Should ASP send a DUPU?
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:57:31 +0530
Sandy <[email protected]> • #9537
[M3UA] Routing Context in DATA sent from ASP
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:10:49 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9536
Re: About the Notify message in SUA
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:18:27 +0530
"Rabindra Nath Tiwari" <[email protected]> • #9535
Re: About the Notify message in SUA
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9534
Re: About the Notify message in SUA
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:27:01 +0530
Prasanna Kumar <[email protected]> • #9533
Re: About the Notify message in SUA
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:31:14 +0530
"Rabindra Nath Tiwari" <[email protected]> • #9532
About the Notify message in SUA
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:41:11 +0530
Prasanna Kumar <[email protected]> • #9531
Re: [M3UA] SE Override
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:36:15 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9530
Re: NBAP over SCTP
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:31:25 +0100
Ben Davis <[email protected]> • #9529
Re: [M3UA] SE Override
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:54:25 +0300
Evgenij <[email protected]> • #9528
Re: BICC codec
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:32:39 +0700
Leo <[email protected]> • #9527
Re: [M3UA] SE Loadshare 2+2
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:10:07 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9526
Re: [M3UA] SE Loadshare 2+2
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:54:23 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9525
Re: [M3UA] SE Loadshare 2+2
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:02:24 -0000
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9524
[M3UA] SE Loadshare 2+2
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 18:58:21 +0300
Evgenij <[email protected]> • #9523
Re: [M3UA] SE Override
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:52:19 +0300
Evgenij <[email protected]> • #9522
Re: [M3UA] SE Override
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:36:52 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9521
Re: BICC codec
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:34:30 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9520
Re: [M3UA] SE Override
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:19:41 +0300
Evgenij <[email protected]> • #9519
Re: [M3UA] SE Override
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:11:21 -0000
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9518
[M3UA] SE Override
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:01:07 +0300
Евгений Фокин <[email protected]> • #9517
BICC codec
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:31:18 +0700
Leo <[email protected]> • #9516
[M3UA] Should ASP Id of ASPs be unique across AS
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:03:22 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9515
Re: Bundling ABORT chunk with OOTB SHUTDOWN-ACK chunk in SCTP
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:43:46 +0530
Aditya Sehgal <[email protected]> • #9514
Re: SCTP packet containing an ABORT chunk bundled after aSHUTDOWN ACK
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:48:23 +0530
"Salil Agrawal" <[email protected]> • #9513
SCTP packet containing an ABORT chunk bundled after a SHUTDOWN ACK
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:45:12 +0530
"Salil Agrawal" <[email protected]> • #9512
Bundling ABORT chunk with OOTB SHUTDOWN-ACK chunk in SCTP
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:42:49 +0530
Prasanna Kumar <[email protected]> • #9511
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.