gmane.ietf.sigtran archive

3511 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 36). Latest articles →

Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:28:11 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9710
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9709
M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 01:19:32 +0400
Mikhail Plotkin <[email protected]> • #9708
Re: SCTP Payload protocol identifier for Diameter
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:26:31 +0200
Victor Pascual Avila <[email protected]> • #9707
Re: SCTP Payload protocol identifier for Diameter
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:29:04 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9706
SCTP Payload protocol identifier for Diameter
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 02:52:44 +0530
Neha4 Garg <[email protected]> • #9705
Re: difference b/w local ps and remote ps
Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:34:45 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9704
difference b/w local ps and remote ps
Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:06:12 +0530
ASHWIN KARANTH <[email protected]> • #9703
Incorrect direction specified for a primitive in RFCs for M3UA and SUA
Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:24:15 +0400
"Sergey Mikhailov" <[email protected]> • #9702
Re: SCTP-Multihoming Clarification needed
Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:08:00 +0000
"Saxena, Ravi (CMS)" <[email protected]> • #9701
Re: SCTP-Multihoming Clarification needed
Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:05:01 +0300
"Leontsinis, Nikos" <[email protected]> • #9700
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:17:26 +0530
"Karmarkar Suyash" <[email protected]> • #9699
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:05:00 +0530
"Karmarkar Suyash" <[email protected]> • #9698
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:59:42 -0400
"Ong, Lyndon" <[email protected]> • #9697
Re: SCTP-Multihoming Clarification needed
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:11:34 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9696
SCTP-Multihoming Clarification needed
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:31:55 +0530
Amar Nv <[email protected]> • #9695
Re: state maintainence of SSN at ASP side
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:58:16 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9694
state maintainence of SSN at ASP side in SUA
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:24:48 +0530
arjun negi <[email protected]> • #9693
state maintainence of SSN at ASP side
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:09:56 +0530
arjun negi <[email protected]> • #9692
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:05:37 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9691
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:24:06 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9690
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:21:08 -0500
Robert Sparks <[email protected]> • #9689
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:30:48 +0530
"Karmarkar Suyash" <[email protected]> • #9688
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:06:55 -0400
"Ong, Lyndon" <[email protected]> • #9687
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:41:42 -0400
"Ong, Lyndon" <[email protected]> • #9686
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:50:44 -0500
"Ken Morneault (kmorneau)" <[email protected]> • #9685
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:25:13 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9684
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 05:22:22 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9683
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:54:20 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9682
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 03:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #9681
Re: Query regarding the message routing fuctionality of M3UA.
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:38:34 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9680
Query regarding the message routing fuctionality of M3UA.
Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:01:03 +0530
Padmalochan Moharana <[email protected]> • #9679
Re: Problem in SCTP association
Sat, 3 Jul 2010 17:30:50 +0530 (IST)
Rajesh Jagga <[email protected]> • #9678
Problem in SCTP association
Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:36:37 +0530 (IST)
Rajesh Jagga <[email protected]> • #9677
Re: Notify in IPSP
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:27:10 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9676
Notify in IPSP
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:42:45 -0400
Moloud Mousavi <[email protected]> • #9675
Re: About SUA
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:19:55 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9674
About SUA
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:06:00 +0800 (SGT)
deddi hp <[email protected]> • #9673
Re: Mismatch Inbound and Outbound streams.
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:35:42 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9672
Mismatch Inbound and Outbound streams.
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:26:40 +0200
"SINGH VIKRAMJEET" <[email protected]> • #9671
Re: Unrecognized Parameters coming from INIT
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9670
Unrecognized Parameters coming from INIT
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:28:46 -0400
Moloud Mousavi <[email protected]> • #9669
Re: What SS7 stack should I use ?
Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:53:08 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9668
What SS7 stack should I use ?
Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:32:41 +0800 (SGT)
deddi hp <[email protected]> • #9667
My PC hung unexpectedly
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:38:49 +0800 (SGT)
deddi hp <[email protected]> • #9666
Implement BSSAP
Mon, 31 May 2010 14:20:36 +0800 (SGT)
deddi hp <[email protected]> • #9665
Re: Alternative to M3UA HeartBeat
Tue, 25 May 2010 11:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9664
Re: Alternative to M3UA HeartBeat
Tue, 25 May 2010 23:52:02 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9663
Re: Alternative to M3UA HeartBeat
Tue, 25 May 2010 11:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9662
Alternative to M3UA HeartBeat
Tue, 25 May 2010 12:03:53 -0400
Moloud Mousavi <[email protected]> • #9661
RFC 4233: IUA and LAPB/LAPF
Sat, 22 May 2010 23:02:58 +0200
Javi <[email protected]> • #9660
Re: Message initiator
Thu, 13 May 2010 18:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9659
Re: Message initiator
Thu, 13 May 2010 17:45:51 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9658
Message initiator
Thu, 13 May 2010 13:50:39 -0400
Moloud Mousavi <[email protected]> • #9657
Re: is it compulsary to have RC in ASP Active?
Wed, 5 May 2010 09:15:17 -0400
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]> • #9656
is it compulsary to have RC in ASP Active?
Wed, 5 May 2010 07:28:14 +0200
"SINGH VIKRAMJEET" <[email protected]> • #9655
Re: optional Network Appearance field
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:46 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9654
optional Network Appearance field
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:09:46 -0400
Moloud Mousavi <[email protected]> • #9653
Re: Query regarding routing context (RC) value in dynamic registration
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9652
Re: Query regarding routing context (RC) value in dynamic registration
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:53:47 -0700
<[email protected]> • #9651
Re: ASPAC retransmission
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:35:51 +0100
Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> • #9650
Re: ASPAC retransmission
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:27:47 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9649
ASPAC retransmission
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:21:50 -0400
Moloud Mousavi <[email protected]> • #9648
Re: Query regarding AS and SG/IPSP
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:47:52 -0400
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]> • #9647
Re: Query regarding AS and SG/IPSP
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:23:43 -0400
Moloud Mousavi <[email protected]> • #9646
Re: Query regarding AS and SG/IPSP
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:16:44 -0400
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]> • #9645
Query regarding AS and SG/IPSP
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:05:28 -0400
Moloud Mousavi <[email protected]> • #9644
Re: Query regarding routing context (RC) value in dynamic registration
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:49:13 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9643
Re: Query regarding routing context (RC) value in dynamic registration
Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9642
Re: Query regarding routing context (RC) value in dynamic registration
Wed, 7 Apr 2010 04:59:30 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9641
Query regarding routing context (RC) value in dynamic registration
Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:30:04 +0530
Sandy <[email protected]> • #9640
Query regarding M3UA DAUD message
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:21:31 +0530
Amit Jain <[email protected]> • #9639
Qyery related to ASPTM message exchange in IPSP-DE mode
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:04:17 +0530
Debasri Sarkar <[email protected]> • #9638
Re: M2PA version 7 ?
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 06:54:40 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9637
M2PA version 7 ?
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:18:00 +0200
Ben Davis <[email protected]> • #9636
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not haveany RC.
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:38:00 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9635
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not haveany RC.
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:32:05 +0000
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #9634
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not haveany RC.
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:24:41 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9633
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not haveany RC.
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:25:57 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9632
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not haveany RC.
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:33:36 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9631
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not haveany RC.
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:23:47 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9630
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not haveany RC.
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:31:31 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9629
Query related to ASPTM message exchange in IPSP-DE mode
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:32:16 +0530
Shivi Singh Verma <[email protected]> • #9628
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not haveany RC.
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:15:39 +0800
"Jaddu, Suresh (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <[email protected]> • #9627
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not have any RC.
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:11:33 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9626
Re: Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not have any RC.
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:41:18 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9625
Behaviour in DE-IPSP model when ASPAC does not have any RC.
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:17:57 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9624
Re: Rc utilization while processing SSSNM messages
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:03:27 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9623
Rc utilization while processing SSSNM messages
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:26:06 +0530
Shivi Singh Verma <[email protected]> • #9622
Re: Fwd: difference between Sinalling types
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:23:13 +0530
ACHARYA B <[email protected]> • #9621
Re: Rc utilization while processing SSNM messages
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:52:49 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9620
Re: Rc utilization while processing SSNM messages
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:24:19 +0530
Shivi Singh Verma <[email protected]> • #9619
Re: Re : Query regarding reachability STATUS of Signaling Point Code
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:57:55 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9618
Re: Re : Query regarding reachability STATUS of Signaling Point Code
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:35:16 +0530
Rajesh Makhija <[email protected]> • #9617
Re: Query regarding reachability STATUS of Signaling Point Code
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:15:33 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9616
Re : Query regarding reachability STATUS of Signaling Point Code
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:02:25 +0800
Xiangsong Cui <[email protected]> • #9615
Re: Rc utilization while processing SSNM messages
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:55:17 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9614
Query regarding reachability STATUS of Signaling Point Code
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:29:08 +0530
Rajesh Makhija <[email protected]> • #9613
Re: Rc utilization while processing SSNM messages
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:35:10 +0530
Shivi Singh Verma <[email protected]> • #9612
Re: Rc utilization while processing SSSNM messages
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:30:43 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9611
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.