gmane.ietf.sigtran archive

3511 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 36). Latest articles →

Invalid Stream Identifier err for DATA message
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 06:56:29 +0530
santosh nayak <[email protected]> • #9810
Re: Strange LK-SCTP behavior in a multi-homing M3UA setup
Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:27:09 +0100
mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> • #9809
Re: Strange LK-SCTP behavior in a multi-homing M3UA setup
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:37:05 +0100
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9808
Strange LK-SCTP behavior in a multi-homing M3UA setup
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:29:33 +0100
mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> • #9807
Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:58:57 +0100
Zoltán Juhász <[email protected]> • #9806
Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:27:26 +0100
Zoltán Juhász <[email protected]> • #9805
Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:58:29 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9804
Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:12:08 +0100
mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> • #9803
Re: SCTP ABORT Issue
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:54:23 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9802
Re: SCTP ABORT Issue
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:43:37 +0530
[email protected] • #9801
Re: M3UA Loadsharing over 2 multi-homed links to 2 SG
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 00:27:05 +0100
mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> • #9800
Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:26:51 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9799
Re: M3UA Loadsharing over 2 multi-homed links to 2 SG
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:17:19 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9798
Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:09:47 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9797
M3UA Loadsharing over 2 multi-homed links to 2 SG
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:48:19 +0100
mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> • #9796
Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:20:12 +0100
mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> • #9795
Re: SCTP ABORT Issue
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:44:08 +0530
Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> • #9794
Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:56:11 +0300
Mikhail Plotkin <[email protected]> • #9793
Re: SCTP ABORT Issue
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:52:11 +0100
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9792
Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:10:37 +0100
Zoltán Juhász <[email protected]> • #9791
SCTP ABORT Issue
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:18:33 +0530
[email protected] • #9790
Re: Is As-Pending state required in IPSP SE mode?
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:55:17 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9789
Is As-Pending state required in IPSP SE mode?
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:01:48 +0530
sachin agrawal <[email protected]> • #9788
Re: [M3UA] ASP UP in IPSP DE mode
Fri, 7 Jan 2011 03:44:47 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9787
Re: [M3UA] ASP UP in IPSP DE mode
Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:29:10 +0800
"Jaddu, Suresh (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <[email protected]> • #9786
Re: [M3UA] ASP UP in IPSP DE mode
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 11:02:16 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9785
Re: [M3UA] ASP UP in IPSP DE mode
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 02:45:50 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9784
[M3UA] ASP UP in IPSP DE mode
Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:26:34 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9783
Re: ASP active procedure
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 22:49:59 +0530
arif khan <[email protected]> • #9782
Re: ASP active procedure
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:11:58 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9781
Re: ASP active procedure
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 03:24:34 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9780
Re: TCAP User Adaptation Layer
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:07:37 +0530
arif khan <[email protected]> • #9779
Re: ASP active procedure
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:53:15 +0530
arif khan <[email protected]> • #9778
Re: ASP active procedure
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:10:39 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9777
Re: TCAP User Adaptation Layer
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 00:05:57 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9776
Re: ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:51:34 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9775
Re: ASP active procedure
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 10:49:49 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9774
Re: ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 19:07:24 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9773
Re: ASP active procedure
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 07:45:42 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9772
TCAP User Adaptation Layer
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:31:26 +0500
Imran Raza Khan <[email protected]> • #9771
Re: ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:07:36 +0530
arif khan <[email protected]> • #9770
Re: ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:31:51 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9769
Re: ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 18:30:16 +0530
arif khan <[email protected]> • #9768
Re: ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:31:05 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9767
Re: ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:49:00 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9766
Re: ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:01:31 +0530
arif khan <[email protected]> • #9765
Re: ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:37:41 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9764
ASP active procedure
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:22:23 +0530
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> • #9763
Re: [M3UA] Clarification required on Static provisioning
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:03:20 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9762
Re: [M3UA] Clarification required on Static provisioning
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:47:16 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9761
Re: [M3UA] Clarification required on Static provisioning
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:16:58 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9760
[M3UA] Clarification required on Static provisioning
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:28:11 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9759
Re: Something improper with ASP state change procedures.
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:12:01 -0000
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9758
Re: Something improper with ASP state change procedures.
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:25:49 +0530
Aditya Sehgal <[email protected]> • #9757
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:55:03 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9756
Re: Something improper with ASP state change procedures.
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:30:11 +0000
Naveen Kottapalli <[email protected]> • #9755
Re: Something improper with ASP state change procedures.
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:10:04 -0500
Andrew Booth <[email protected]> • #9754
Re: Something improper with ASP state change procedures.
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:46:53 -0800 (PST)
Dario Filjar <[email protected]> • #9753
Something improper with ASP state change procedures.
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:36:08 +0000
Naveen Kottapalli <[email protected]> • #9752
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:55:37 +0100
Ilie Glib <[email protected]> • #9751
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:50:26 +0100
Ilie Glib <[email protected]> • #9750
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:03:36 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9749
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:57:12 +0100
Ilie Glib <[email protected]> • #9748
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:02:14 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9747
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 21:04:48 +0300
Евгений Фокин <[email protected]> • #9746
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:03:25 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9745
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:20:54 -0400
Sunderjeet Singh <[email protected]> • #9744
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:38:26 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9743
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:12:25 -0400
Sunderjeet Singh <[email protected]> • #9742
Re: Does AS marks entire SG congested, when SCON is received on one of two PSPs configured with SG.
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:57:16 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9741
Does AS marks entire SG congested, when SCON is received on one of two PSPs configured with SG.
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:40:35 +0530
"SINGH, VIKRAMJEET (VIKRAMJEET)" <[email protected]> • #9740
Re: sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:13:42 -0800 (PST)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9739
sending ASP UP in IPSP SE
Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:10:01 +0800
"Jaddu, Suresh (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <[email protected]> • #9738
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:50:22 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9737
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:37:24 -0400
Andrew Booth <[email protected]> • #9736
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:34:20 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9735
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:49:55 -0400
Andrew Booth <[email protected]> • #9734
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9733
Re: RC=0 in Remote AS configuration if it is SGP-ASP mode
Sat, 9 Oct 2010 22:50:37 +0530
Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> • #9732
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Sat, 9 Oct 2010 02:48:04 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9731
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Sat, 9 Oct 2010 02:42:57 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9730
Re: RC=0 in Remote AS configuration if it is SGP-ASP mode
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9729
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9728
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:44:26 -0400
Andrew Booth <[email protected]> • #9727
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:19:55 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9726
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:34:09 -0400
Andrew Booth <[email protected]> • #9725
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:45:36 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9724
Handling of Duplicate COOKIE-ECHO
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:33:37 +0530
Nagendra U <[email protected]> • #9723
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:02:57 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #9722
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:56:18 +0400
Evgenij <[email protected]> • #9721
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:20:20 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9720
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 15:56:39 +0400
Evgenij <[email protected]> • #9719
Re: RC=0 in Remote AS configuration if it is SGP-ASP mode
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 04:54:01 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9718
RC=0 in Remote AS configuration if it is SGP-ASP mode
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:04:15 +0530
"SINGH, VIKRAMJEET (VIKRAMJEET)" <[email protected]> • #9717
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:50:28 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9716
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:24:01 -0400
Benjamin Wilson <[email protected]> • #9715
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Sat, 2 Oct 2010 00:16:32 +0400
Mikhail Plotkin <[email protected]> • #9714
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:05:15 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9713
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:58:12 -0400
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]> • #9712
Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:38:07 +0400
Mikhail Plotkin <[email protected]> • #9711
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.