gmane.ietf.sigtran archive

3511 archived articles, newest first (page 7 of 36). Latest articles →

Re: In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:08:18 +0100
Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> • #9510
Re: In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:32:59 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9509
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:40:19 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9508
Re: In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:55:07 +0100
Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> • #9507
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:40:25 +0530
Ashwani Kathuria <[email protected]> • #9506
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:04:46 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9505
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:03:03 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9504
Re: In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:18:52 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9503
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:48:40 +0100
Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> • #9502
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:36:31 +0530
"Salil Agrawal" <[email protected]> • #9501
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:30:11 +0530
Ashwani Kathuria <[email protected]> • #9500
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:28:32 +0530
"Salil Agrawal" <[email protected]> • #9499
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:11:15 +0530
Ashwani Kathuria <[email protected]> • #9498
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:46:31 +0530
"Salil Agrawal" <[email protected]> • #9497
Re: Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:57:49 +0530
Ashwani Kathuria <[email protected]> • #9496
Abort chunk bundled with data chunk
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:37:35 +0530
"Salil Agrawal" <[email protected]> • #9495
Re: In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:53:46 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9494
Re: In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:41:08 +0530
Ashwani Kathuria <[email protected]> • #9493
Re: In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:35:25 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9492
Re: In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receiving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 20:22:59 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9491
Re: In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:32:38 +0530
Ashwani Kathuria <[email protected]> • #9490
In IPSP-IPSP mode what should be the behavior on receving Notify(AS-PENDING) when AS is already AS-ACTIVE
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 14:53:42 +0530
Deepak Gunjal <[email protected]> • #9489
Re: [M3UA] Notify in DE mode
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:02:14 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9488
[M3UA] Notify in DE mode
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:33:59 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9487
Re: Doubt regarding SCTP TSN/SSN
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:41:22 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9486
Doubt regarding SCTP TSN/SSN
Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:43:57 +0530
Nagesh <[email protected]> • #9485
I-D draft-hunt-sigtran-iua-rate-message-00: IUA message backward compatibility
Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:05:17 +0100
<[email protected]> • #9484
M3UA: IPSP SE with different traffic modes
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:31:10 -0400
Howard May <[email protected]> • #9483
Re: [M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:13:18 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9482
Re: How to stop an sctp sender with zero A_rwnd
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:56:43 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9481
Re: How to stop an sctp sender with zero A_rwnd
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:55:25 +0800
<[email protected]> • #9480
How to stop an sctp sender with zero A_rwnd
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:40:50 +0800
Mohammad Arif <[email protected]> • #9479
Sigtran calculation
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:31:16 +0530 (IST)
Rajesh Jagga <[email protected]> • #9478
the way to calculate bandwidth for sigtran channeling!
Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:52:27 +0700
Pham Van Nam <[email protected]> • #9477
Re: about the parameter "correlation Id" in MxUA
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:05:20 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9476
Re: [M3UA] Notify procedures in IPSP
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:05:16 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9475
[M3UA] Notify procedures in IPSP
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:55:33 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9474
Re: [M3UA] IPSP/ASP Management request and Reinitiating the procedures
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:03:09 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9473
Re: [M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:51:23 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9472
[M3UA] IPSP/ASP Management request and Reinitiating the procedures
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:03:25 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9471
Re: [M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:37:17 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9470
Re: [M3UA] Management Blocking
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:04:38 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9469
Re: [M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:00:13 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9468
Re: [M3UA] Management Blocking
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:41:33 +0530
Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> • #9467
Re: [M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:03:57 +0530
Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> • #9466
Re: [M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:14:52 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9465
Re: [M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack
Thu, 9 Jul 2009 06:29:54 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9464
Re: [M3UA] Management Blocking
Thu, 9 Jul 2009 06:22:47 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9463
[M3UA] Management Blocking
Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:14:30 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9462
[M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack
Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:09:25 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9461
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 18:12:16 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9460
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:32:47 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9459
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:25:58 +0200
<[email protected]> • #9458
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:13:30 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9457
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:55:39 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9456
Re: [M3UA]Broadcast Mode in M3UA
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:07:41 +0530
Kuldeep Janjua <[email protected]> • #9455
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:19:44 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9454
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 00:43:33 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9453
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:02:41 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9452
Re: [M3UA]Broadcast Mode in M3UA
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Benson <[email protected]> • #9451
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:51:09 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9450
Re: [M3UA]Broadcast Mode in M3UA
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:03:51 +0800
<[email protected]> • #9449
Re: [M3UA]Broadcast Mode in M3UA
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:20:37 +0530
Kuldeep Janjua <[email protected]> • #9448
Re: [M3UA]Broadcast Mode in M3UA
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:11:39 +0800
<[email protected]> • #9447
[M3UA]Broadcast Mode in M3UA
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:22:40 +0530
Kuldeep Janjua <[email protected]> • #9446
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:50:57 +0200
<[email protected]> • #9445
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:23:39 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9444
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:11:34 +0200
Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> • #9443
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:12:09 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9442
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:23:24 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9441
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:19:47 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9440
Re: [M3UA] Receving ASP ACTIVE in DOWN State
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:07:46 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9439
Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Fri, 3 Jul 2009 21:38:27 +0200
"Gomes, Rui Filipe Efigénio, VF-PT" <[email protected]> • #9438
Re: [M3UA] Receving ASP ACTIVE in DOWN State
Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:39:53 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9437
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:19:25 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9436
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:52:55 +0200
"Gomes, Rui Filipe Efigénio, VF-PT" <[email protected]> • #9435
Re: [M3UA] Receving ASP ACTIVE in DOWN State
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:29:47 +0800
<[email protected]> • #9434
Re: [M3UA] Receving ASP ACTIVE in DOWN State
Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:36:04 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9433
Re: [M3UA] Receving ASP ACTIVE in DOWN State
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 01:30:47 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9432
Re: [M3UA] Receving ASP ACTIVE in DOWN State
Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:00:35 +0800
<[email protected]> • #9431
[M3UA] Receving ASP ACTIVE in DOWN State
Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:44:41 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9430
Re: Clarify SCTP max packet size.
Fri, 3 Jul 2009 21:26:31 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9429
Re: [M2UA]Clarify M2UA flow control/congestion procedure
Fri, 3 Jul 2009 08:35:28 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9428
Re: [M2UA]Clarify M2UA flow control/congestion procedure
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:54:54 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9427
Re: [M3UA] Routing-Key Values
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:17:01 +0530
Kuldeep Janjua <[email protected]> • #9426
Re: [M3UA] Routing-Key Values
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:13:02 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9425
[M3UA] Routing-Key Values
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:34:48 +0530
Kuldeep Janjua <[email protected]> • #9424
Re: [M3UA] Double Exchange procedures
Sun, 7 Jun 2009 01:39:47 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9423
Re: [M3UA] Double Exchange procedures
Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:35:58 +0530
Adnan Hasnain Alam <[email protected]> • #9422
Re: [M3UA] Double Exchange procedures
Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:23:19 +0100
"David Laight" <[email protected]> • #9421
Re: [M3UA] Double Exchange procedures
Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:07:26 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9420
[M3UA] Double Exchange procedures
Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:26:38 +0530
Santhana <[email protected]> • #9419
Re: Help:Clarification on M3UA functionality
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:30:24 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9418
Re: Help:Clarification on M3UA functionality
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:40:41 +0800
"Sergey Mikhailov" <[email protected]> • #9417
Re: Help:Clarification on M3UA functionality
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:38:50 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9416
Re: Help:Clarification on M3UA functionality
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:35:49 -0400
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]> • #9415
Re: Help:Clarification on M3UA functionality
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:19:23 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9414
Re: Help:Clarification on M3UA functionality
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:18:32 -0600
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #9413
Re: Help:Clarification on M3UA functionality
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:04:46 +0200
"HOLLAND, Peter (Peter)" <[email protected]> • #9412
Re: Help:Clarification on M3UA functionality
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:51:55 +0530
Suresh Marikkannu <[email protected]> • #9411
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.