gmane.ietf.sip archive
2919 archived articles, newest first (page 13 of 30). Latest articles →
Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-info-events
Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:59:40 +0100Re: New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?
Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:10:56 -0800Re: New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?
Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:58:14 +0100Re: Fwd: I-DAction:draft-sparks-sip-3261-interop-statement-00.txt
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:23:22 +0000Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:12:34 +0900Re: New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?
Tue, 3 Mar 2009 01:59:15 -0600Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-sparks-sip-3261-interop-statement-00.txt
Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:23:27 +0100Re: FW: Initial Version I-D Submission Deadline Extended to March 4, 2009
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:45:14 -0500Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-sparks-sip-3261-interop-statement-00.txt
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:29:51 +0100Re: Connection Reuse draft to focus on TLS connections
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:30:41 -0600Re: Connection Reuse draft to focus on TLS connections
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:26:07 -0500Re: Connection Reuse draft to focus on TLS connections
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:21:49 -0600Re: ACK response
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:17:02 -0500Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-sparks-sip-3261-interop-statement-00.txt
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:12:09 -0500Re: Connection Reuse draft to focus on TLS connections
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:58:45 -0500Fwd: I-D Action:draft-sparks-sip-invfix-03.txt
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:20:08 -0600Re: Connection Reuse draft to focus on TLS connections
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:19:55 -0600Fwd: I-D Action:draft-sparks-sip-3261-interop-statement-00.txt
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:19:27 -0600Fwd: I-D Action:draft-sparks-sip-3261-norm-ref-status-00.txt
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:19:08 -0600Re: Connection Reuse draft to focus on TLS connections
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 21:12:53 +0100Connection Reuse draft to focus on TLS connections
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:03:55 -0600Re: ACK response
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:09:49 -0800Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:23:25 +0000Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI and RFC 3986
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 06:37:23 -0800Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI and RFC 3986
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:20:59 -0500Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-info-events
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 05:18:37 -0800New version (-06) of the 199 draft
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:58:42 +0100Re: Frequency of Register Message ??
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:55:22 -0500I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-199-06.txt
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 04:15:01 -0800 (PST)Re: Tel URI query
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:57:54 +0800Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-info-events
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:48:07 +0100Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:47:28 +0100Re: SIP amplification vulnerability -01 (draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-01)
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:08:49 +0000Re: Tel URI query
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:57:44 +0100ACK response
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:40:34 +0530Frequency of Register Message ??
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:50:12 +0530 (IST)Re: SIP amplification vulnerability -01 (draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-01)
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:22:01 -0500Re: Tel URI query
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:25:29 +0530I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-dtls-srtp-framework-06.txt
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:00:01 -0800 (PST)Re: ??: RE: Questions about "draft-ietf-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:51:07 +0100Re: Questions about the status of dual video feature in SIP
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:47:12 -0600Re: ??: RE: Questions about "draft-ietf-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:39:29 +0100答复: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-ietf-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:35:35 +0800Re: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-i etf-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:21:39 +0100Re: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-iet f-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:10:29 +0800Re: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-i etf-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:00:36 +0100Re: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-iet f-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:49:16 +0800Re: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-i etf-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:23:02 +0100Re: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-i etf-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:13:20 +0100Re: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-i etf-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:01:26 +0100答复: Re: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-ietf-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:38:21 +0800Re: 答复: RE: Questions about "draft-iet f-sip-199-05"
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:56:27 -0500答复: RE: Questions about "draft-iet f-sip-199-05"
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:06:23 +0800Questions about the status of dual video feature in SIP
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:10:57 +1100FW: Initial Version I-D Submission Deadline Extended to March 4, 2009
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:07:28 +0100Re: Questions about "draft-ietf-sip-199-05"
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:04:03 +0100Re: Questions about "draft-ietf-sip-199-05"
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:37:30 +0800Re: Questions about "draft-ietf-sip-199-05"
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:24:20 +0100Re: Diagnostic idea
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:04:10 -0500Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:39:08 -0500Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:36:10 -0500draft-elwell-sip-e2e-identity-important-03
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:21:13 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:01:02 -0600Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:27:42 +0000Re: Comment on sip-ua-privacy-05.txt
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:59:36 +0900Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:58:18 +0000Re: Notes of identity conference call held 17th Feb 2009
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:43:23 -0800Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:29:46 -0600Re: Implementing SHA digest auth (new topic)
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:30:48 -0500Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:20:25 +0000Re: Notes of identity conference call held 17th Feb 2009
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:40:51 +0100draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:12:18 -0600Re: Notes of identity conference call held 17th Feb 2009
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:34 -0800Re: Diagnostic idea
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:36:47 -0600Re: Diagnostic idea
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:33:49 -0600Re: Diagnostic idea
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:03:00 -0600Re: SSLstrip: Implications for SIPS and our imaginary padlock icon?
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:23:30 -0800Notes of identity conference call held 17th Feb 2009
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:56:38 +0100Handling MESSAGE with in dialog
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:27:36 +0530Re: SIP amplification vulnerability -01 (draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-01)
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:34:26 -0500Re: Diagnostic idea
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:08:29 +0000Diagnostic idea
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:37:28 -0500Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:19:06 -0500Re: SIP amplification vulnerability -01 (draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-01)
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:17:41 -0500Re: SSLstrip: Implications for SIPS and our imaginary padlock icon?
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:45:01 +0000SSLstrip: Implications for SIPS and our imaginary padlock icon?
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:33:07 -0600Usable version of xml2rfc posted
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:17:06 -0600Re: Comment on sip-ua-privacy-05.txt
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:43:19 -0600Questions about "draft-ietf-sip-199-05"
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:16:46 +0800Re: SIP amplification vulnerability -01 (draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-01)
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:49:14 +0000Re: Comment on sip-ua-privacy-05.txt
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:30:05 +0100[Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-worley-references-02]
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:38:20 -0500Re: SIP amplification vulnerability -01 (draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-01)
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:55:13 -0500Re: New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:55:21 -0700Re: New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:06:45 -0500Re: New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:41:44 -0800Re: New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:43:22 -0700Re: SIP amplification vulnerability -01 (draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-01)
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:32:35 +0000Re: SIP amplification vulnerability -01 (draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-01)
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:19:37 -0500Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:49:08 +0000
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.