gmane.ietf.sip archive
2919 archived articles, newest first (page 14 of 30). Latest articles →
SIP amplification vulnerability -01 (draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-01)
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:32:49 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:03:17 -0500Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:14:20 -0800Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:44:33 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:06:52 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:34:59 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:22:24 +0100Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:24:03 -0500Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:05:30 +0000Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1687)
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:11:50 +0530Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:28:28 -0600Re: questions about usage of tel URI with a SIP UA
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:41:32 -0800Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:53:34 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:45:08 -0800Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:42:18 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:40:15 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:36:51 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:44:40 -0800Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:46:32 +0100Re: questions about usage of tel URI with a SIP UA
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:58:51 +0100Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:45:42 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:43:15 +0000Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:33:24 +0530draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:20:07 +0000questions about usage of tel URI with a SIP UA
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:05:27 -0800I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-199-05.txt
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:15:01 -0800 (PST)New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:12:01 +0100[Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1687)
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:02:02 -0800 (PST)Re: Comment on sip-ua-privacy-05.txt
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:52:50 +0900Re: Comment on sip-ua-privacy-05.txt
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:34:45 +0900Re: Comment on sip-ua-privacy-05.txt
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:53:17 +0100New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:49:29 +0100Comment on sip-ua-privacy-05.txt
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:51:22 +0000draft-ietf-sip-info-events-03: comments and questions
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:18:28 -0800WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:00:55 +0100WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-info-events
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:07:44 -0600FW: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:15:52 +0100Re: New HTTP Event Package Draft
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:32:44 +0000Re: draft-ietf-sip-media-security-requirements-09
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:01:03 -0800Re: Problems with History-Info
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:20:58 -0600Re: rfc3261: default contact q-value
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:42:14 -0800Re: rfc3261: default contact q-value
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:00:47 +0100draft-ietf-sip-media-security-requirements-09
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:59:12 +0200Re: rfc3261: default contact q-value
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:11:38 -0800rfc3261: default contact q-value
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:00:09 -0800Re: Problems with History-Info
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:44:25 -0500Re: Problems with History-Info
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:44:37 -0600[Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (1682)
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:33:29 -0800 (PST)Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:12:21 -0500Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:56:47 -0500Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:25:43 +0530Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:14:46 -0500Update of draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:19:52 +0900I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-05.txt
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:15:01 -0800 (PST)Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:27:22 +0530Retargeting difficulties
Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:01:18 -0500Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:25:06 -0800Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:14:09 -0500Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:03:48 -0600Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:03:21 -0800Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:59:46 -0800[Technical Errata Reported] RFC4028 (1681)
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:36:34 -0800 (PST)Re: Can we use From Header's value to build Contact in REFER
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:34:00 -0600Can we use From Header's value to build Contact in REFER
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:47:30 +0530Re: Nits in draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-04
Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:01:06 +0900Comments on draft-ietf-sip-body-handling-05
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:09:39 -0500Re: Question on loop detection
Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:54:31 -0500Re: Question on loop detection
Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:47:46 +0000Re: Question on loop detection
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:15:04 +0530Re: Question on loop detection
Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:03:30 +0000Re: Question on loop detection
Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:19:54 +0000Nits in draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-04
Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:19:54 +0000I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-04.txt
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:45:01 -0800 (PST)Re: Question on loop detection
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:43:43 +0000RFC 5411 on A Hitchhiker's Guide to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:34:09 -0800 (PST)Re: Question on loop detection
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:07:56 -0600Re: Question on loop detection
Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:59:07 -0500Re: Question on loop detection
Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:24:30 +0000Re: Question on loop detection
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:00:23 +0000Question on loop detection
Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:31:25 +0000Re: How do we adress this SDP issue in SIP
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:17:37 +0200How do we adress this SDP issue in SIP
Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:55:43 +0530Re: Is Contact Header mandatory in REFER message?
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:07:30 +0530Re: [SIP] Max no of non-invite pending transaction within a dialog
Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:21:47 -0500Re: Is Contact Header mandatory in REFER message?
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:47:50 -0500Is Contact Header mandatory in REFER message?
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:50:39 +0530Problems with History-Info
Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:53:56 -0500Re: gateway(like Gtalk toVoip)
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:35:33 +0100Re: gateway(like Gtalk toVoip)
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:12:35 +0800gateway(like Gtalk toVoip)
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:25:11 +0530Re: SIP de-REGISTER: Expires header vs expires parameteri Contact
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:52:33 -0600Notes of conference call of group working on identity
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:18:03 +0100I-D Action:draft-ietf-sip-info-events-03.txt
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:15:02 -0800 (PST)Document Action: 'Requirements and Analysis of Media Security Management Protocols' to Informational RFC
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:14:17 -0800 (PST)Protocol Action: 'IANA Registration of New Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Resource-Priority Namespaces' to Proposed Standard
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:28:54 -0800 (PST)Re: SIP de-REGISTER: Expires header vs expires parameter i Contact
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:18:36 -0500Re: SIP de-REGISTER: Expires header vs expires parameter i Contact
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:48:47 +0100[SIP] Max no of non-invite pending transaction within a dialog
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:49:59 +0530draft-elwell-sip-e2e-identity-important-02
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:26:24 +0000Re: Conclusion of WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-03
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:49:35 -0600
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.