gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64 archive

1328 archived articles, newest first (page 11 of 14). Latest articles →

repositories
Fri, 1 May 2015 10:02:50 +0100
Edwin Zarthrusz <[email protected]> • #28373
Guide to getting ported?
Fri, 01 May 2015 12:44:44 +0800
Paul Wise <[email protected]> • #28372
Ports pages need updating on www.d.o
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:37:02 +0100
Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> • #28371
Re: no pulseaudio daemon
Mon, 2 Mar 2015 08:00:39 +0100
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28370
Re: no pulseaudio daemon
Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:42:16 +0100
Michael <[email protected]> • #28369
no pulseaudio daemon
Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:55:40 +0100
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28368
running kodi (xbmc) on debian
Sun, 22 Feb 2015 18:29:51 +0000
Michael Fothergill <[email protected]> • #28367
International Business Forum “SUBF 2015”
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:34:25 +0200
"International Organization Committee" <[email protected]> • #28366
Re: debian-amd64 list obsolete now ?
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:35:54 +0000
Jaime Ochoa Malagón <[email protected]> • #28365
debian-amd64 list obsolete now ?
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:54:07 +0100
Michael <[email protected]> • #28364
Re: Xfce vs GNOME
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:48:14 +0100
Michael <[email protected]> • #28363
Re: Xfce vs GNOME
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:13:21 -0500
Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> • #28362
Re: Xfce vs GNOME
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:00:46 +0100
Michael <[email protected]> • #28361
Re: Xfce vs GNOME
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:55:38 +0100
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28360
Re: Xfce vs GNOME
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:57:32 +0100
Michael <[email protected]> • #28359
Re: Xfce vs GNOME
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:57:36 +0100
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28358
Re: Xfce vs GNOME
Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:55:40 +0100
Tomasz Kundera <[email protected]> • #28357
Xfce vs GNOME
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:12:48 +0100
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28356
Re: How many *physical CPU* can Debian-7.7.0-amd64 support?
Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:01:53 -0500
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28355
How many *physical CPU* can Debian-7.7.0-amd64 support?
Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:25:48 +0000 (UTC)
Shio Gai Quek <[email protected]> • #28354
Re: Urgent! Questions/Confirmations concerning *Debian 7.7.0 amd64* before I install it.
Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:28:16 -0500
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28353
Re: Urgent! Questions/Confirmations concerning *Debian 7.7.0 amd64* before I install it.
Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:43:03 +0200
Georgi Naplatanov <[email protected]> • #28352
Re: Urgent! Questions/Confirmations concerning *Debian 7.7.0 amd64* before I install it.
Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:23:04 +0000
Darac Marjal <[email protected]> • #28351
Urgent! Questions/Confirmations concerning *Debian 7.7.0 amd64* before I install it.
Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:26:41 +0000 (UTC)
Shio Gai Quek <[email protected]> • #28350
Your bank draft 602Pc79
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:53:18 GMT
U.N.O <[email protected]> • #28349
Re: Fwd: Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:07:22 +0100
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28348
Re: Fwd: Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:37:51 +0100
Steffen Grunewald <[email protected]> • #28347
Fwd: Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:35:43 +0000
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28346
Re: Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:33:21 +0000
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28345
Re: Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:33:32 +0100
Hans <[email protected]> • #28344
Re: Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:27:38 -0500
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28343
Re: Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:27:01 -0500
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28342
Re: Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:48:13 +0100
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28341
Re: Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:10:24 +0100
Hans <[email protected]> • #28340
Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:33:26 +0000
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28339
Re: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:11:56 +0000
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28338
Re: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:56:28 -0500
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28337
Fwd: module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:44:57 +0100
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28336
module nvidia not found / amd64 jessie
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:27:26 +0000
Francesco Pietra <[email protected]> • #28335
Re: How to make systemd minimallly acceptable.
Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:30:44 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28334
How to make systemd minimallly acceptable.
Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:27:14 -0400
Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> • #28333
Re: complaints about systemd
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:10:23 +1100
Dean Hamstead <[email protected]> • #28332
Re: complaints about systemd
Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:15:56 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28331
Re: complaints about systemd
Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:32:11 -0400
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28330
Re: complaints about systemd
Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:47:51 +1100
Dean Hamstead <[email protected]> • #28329
Re: complaints about systemd
Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:28:29 -0400
Christopher Browne <[email protected]> • #28328
Re: complaints about systemd
Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:51:43 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28327
Re: complaints about systemd
Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:38:35 -0400
Christopher Browne <[email protected]> • #28326
Re: complaints about systemd
Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:51:07 +0300 (EEST)
Antti Kultanen <[email protected]> • #28325
Re: What is the evidence for and against systemd?
Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:11:37 -0400
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28324
Re: What is the evidence for and against systemd?
Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:34:45 +0200
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #28323
Re: What is the evidence for and against systemd?
Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:48:24 +1100
Dean Hamstead <[email protected]> • #28322
What is the evidence for and against systemd?
Sun, 12 Oct 2014 08:51:44 -0400
Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> • #28321
Re: OT: complaints about systemd
Sat, 11 Oct 2014 20:19:14 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28320
Re: OT: complaints about systemd
Sun, 12 Oct 2014 13:36:21 +1100
Andrew McGlashan <[email protected]> • #28319
Re: OT: complaints about systemd
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:13:04 +0200
Michael <[email protected]> • #28318
Re: OT: complaints about systemd
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:02:47 -0400
Christopher Browne <[email protected]> • #28317
Re: OT: complaints about systemd
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:40:26 +0200
Michael <[email protected]> • #28316
Re: OT: complaints about systemd
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:52:47 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28315
Re: OT: complaints about systemd
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:37:11 +0300
Vasileios Karaklioumis <[email protected]> • #28314
Re: OT: complaints about systemd
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:58:09 -0500
Jason Young <[email protected]> • #28313
Re: complaints about systemd
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:44:46 +0100
ael <[email protected]> • #28312
OT: complaints about systemd
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:19:05 +0200
Michael <[email protected]> • #28311
Re: OT: complaints about systemd
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:35:36 -0400
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28310
OT: complaints about systemd
Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:53:56 +0200
Michael <[email protected]> • #28309
Re: complaints about systemd
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 19:49:20 -0400
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28308
Re: complaints about systemd
Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:25:23 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28307
Re: complaints about systemd
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:05:32 +0100
Darac Marjal <[email protected]> • #28306
Re: complaints about systemd
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:46:54 +0200 (CEST)
Giacomo Mulas <[email protected]> • #28305
Re: complaints about systemd
Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:11:57 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28304
Re: complaints about systemd
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:39:20 -0400
Robert Goley <[email protected]> • #28303
Re: complaints about systemd
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:41:55 +0200
Tomasz Kundera <[email protected]> • #28302
Re: complaints about systemd
Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:38:54 +1100
Dean Hamstead <[email protected]> • #28301
Re: complaints about systemd
Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:25:01 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28300
Re: complaints about systemd
Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:39:47 +0100
ael <[email protected]> • #28299
Re: complaints about systemd
Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:32:58 +0200
Michael <[email protected]> • #28298
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:20:21 -0400
Christopher Browne <[email protected]> • #28297
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Mon, 6 Oct 2014 01:27:59 +0200
Michael <[email protected]> • #28296
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Sun, 5 Oct 2014 16:21:49 -0400
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28295
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Sun, 5 Oct 2014 22:12:18 +0200
Michael <[email protected]> • #28294
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Sun, 05 Oct 2014 12:21:21 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28293
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Sun, 5 Oct 2014 13:12:21 -0400
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28292
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Sun, 05 Oct 2014 07:59:17 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28291
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Sat, 4 Oct 2014 22:03:55 -0400
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28290
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Sat, 04 Oct 2014 06:53:56 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28289
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Sat, 4 Oct 2014 11:45:20 +0200
Michael <[email protected]> • #28288
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:23:31 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28287
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:45:59 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28286
Re: new software if moving to amd64?
Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:20:48 -0400
"Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]> • #28285
new software if moving to amd64?
Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:38:51 -0700
Ray Andrews <[email protected]> • #28284
Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:51:29 +0100
Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> • #28283
Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:01:00 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #28282
Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:49:07 +0200
Alexander Wirt <[email protected]> • #28281
Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:05:20 +0100
Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> • #28280
Re: sh4 missing on packages.debian.org
Sat, 6 Sep 2014 08:58:49 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #28279
Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?
Fri, 5 Sep 2014 19:36:53 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #28278
Re: sh4 missing on packages.debian.org
Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:28:19 +0100
Steven Chamberlain <[email protected]> • #28277
Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?
Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:15:07 +0100
Steven Chamberlain <[email protected]> • #28276
Time to change the debian-ports "list"?
Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:39:10 +0100
Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> • #28275
sh4 missing on packages.debian.org
Fri, 05 Sep 2014 19:04:50 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #28274
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.