gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy archive

375 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Openssl updates
Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:49:28 -0600
"Russ Lavoie" <[email protected]> • #6758
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:29:35 -0500
Gene Heskett <[email protected]> • #6757
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:53:05 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6756
Re: RHEL3: Problem going from RH 2.4.20 to Linus 2.4.33
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:58:56 -0700
"Stephen John Smoogen" <[email protected]> • #6755
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:39:12 -0500
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> • #6754
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:30:22 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6753
Re: Mailman vulnerability
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:04:39 -0300 (ART)
Martin Marques <[email protected]> • #6752
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:48:21 -0600
Mike McCarty <[email protected]> • #6751
Re: Self Introduction
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:48:16 -0400
Jeff Sheltren <[email protected]> • #6750
Self Introduction
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Lizard King825 <[email protected]> • #6749
[SPAM] HIGH * Re: RHEL3: Problem going from RH 2.4.20 to Linus 2.4.33
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:19:44 -0500
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> • #6748
RHEL3: Problem going from RH 2.4.20 to Linus 2.4.33
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:25:29 -0600
David Douthitt <[email protected]> • #6747
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:40:57 -0500
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) <[email protected]> • #6746
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:31:10 -0500
Gene Heskett <[email protected]> • #6745
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:36:28 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6744
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:33:05 -0500
Gene Heskett <[email protected]> • #6743
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:05:49 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6742
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:53:47 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6741
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:43:43 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6740
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:34:17 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6739
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:00:47 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6738
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:31:58 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6737
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:25:44 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6736
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:24:09 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6735
Re: Upgrading FC releases via yum
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:23:10 -0700
Michal Jaegermann <[email protected]> • #6734
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:21:44 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6733
Re: Upgrading FC releases via yum
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:31:55 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> • #6732
Upgrading FC releases via yum
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:30:27 -0600
Kirk Pickering <[email protected]> • #6731
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:15:51 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6730
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:58:02 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6729
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:56:37 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6728
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:49:13 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6727
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:50:13 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6726
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:48:53 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6725
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:45:16 -0400
Jeff Sheltren <[email protected]> • #6724
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:43:10 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6723
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:40:16 -0400
Jeff Sheltren <[email protected]> • #6722
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:30:24 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6721
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:27:55 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6720
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:22:31 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6719
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:17:19 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6718
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:16:01 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6717
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:03:02 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6716
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:57:31 -0400
Jeff Sheltren <[email protected]> • #6715
[SPAM] LOW * Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:57:32 -0500
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> • #6714
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:55:46 -0500
"Josep L. Guallar-Esteve" <[email protected]> • #6713
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:41:42 -0400
Jeff Sheltren <[email protected]> • #6712
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Bill Perrotta <[email protected]> • #6711
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:32:33 -0500
Gene Heskett <[email protected]> • #6710
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:10:13 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6709
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:54:32 -0500
Gene Heskett <[email protected]> • #6708
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:48:25 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6707
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:45:11 -0500
James Kosin <[email protected]> • #6706
Re: Mailman vulnerability
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:25:23 -0300
Martin Marques <[email protected]> • #6705
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:23:04 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6704
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:15:05 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6703
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:49:50 -0500
James Kosin <[email protected]> • #6702
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:25:02 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6701
Re: Mailman vulnerability
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:50:46 -0600
David Eisenstein <[email protected]> • #6700
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:06:57 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6699
Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:47:30 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6698
Re: I get this error when trying to upgrade my 2.4.20-8 to 2.6.3 after make install
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:04:16 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6697
Re: Mailman vulnerability
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:56:27 -0300 (ART)
Martin Marques <[email protected]> • #6696
Re: I get this error when trying to upgrade my 2.4.20-8 to 2.6.3 after make install
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:52:11 +1000
"Michael Mansour" <[email protected]> • #6695
Re: I get this error when trying to upgrade my 2.4.20-8 to 2.6.3 after make install
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:50:22 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6694
Re: I get this error when trying to upgrade my 2.4.20-8 to 2.6.3 after make install
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:36:00 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6693
Re: I get this error when trying to upgrade my 2.4.20-8 to 2.6.3 after make install
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:27:28 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6692
Re: I get this error when trying to upgrade my 2.4.20-8 to 2.6.3 after make install
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Bill Perrotta <[email protected]> • #6691
Re: I get this error when trying to upgrade my 2.4.20-8 to 2.6.3 after make install
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:44:45 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6690
Re: Wiki Correction
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:22:39 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> • #6689
Wiki Correction
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:31:28 -0600
Jason Reusch <[email protected]> • #6688
[FLSA-2006:211760] Updated gzip package fixes security issues
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:42:12 -0600
David Eisenstein <[email protected]> • #6687
I get this error when trying to upgrade my 2.4.20-8 to 2.6.3 after make install
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:36:48 -0800 (PST)
Bill Perrotta <[email protected]> • #6686
Re: Self Introduction: Jeroen 'kanarip' van Meeuwen
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:00:23 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6685
Self Introduction: Jeroen 'kanarip' van Meeuwen
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:39:45 +0100
Jeroen van Meeuwen <[email protected]> • #6684
Updates for PHP, Python, and Qt
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:05:27 -0400
Jeff Sheltren <[email protected]> • #6683
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:51:25 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6682
Re: Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:22:45 -0700
Michal Jaegermann <[email protected]> • #6681
Re: Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:34:30 -0500
Christopher Aillon <[email protected]> • #6680
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:23:01 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6679
Re: Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:12:17 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6678
Re: Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:00:36 -0500
Gene Heskett <[email protected]> • #6677
Re: Mailman vulnerability
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:22:06 -0300 (ART)
Martin Marques <[email protected]> • #6676
Re: Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:48:52 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #6675
Re: Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:21:12 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6674
Re: Mailman vulnerability
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:19:02 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6673
Re: Mailman vulnerability
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:45:40 -0300 (ART)
Martin Marques <[email protected]> • #6672
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 05:10:51 -0600
David Eisenstein <[email protected]> • #6671
Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:43:24 -0600
David Eisenstein <[email protected]> • #6670
Re: Some supporting ideas regarding fedora legacy project when FC6 is out today
Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:18:45 -0800
Tim Thome <[email protected]> • #6669
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:57:38 -0800
Tim Thome <[email protected]> • #6668
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:40:50 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> • #6667
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 22:57:28 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #6666
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:56:32 -0600
Eric Rostetter <[email protected]> • #6665
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:54:34 -0500
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> • #6664
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 22:47:21 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #6663
Re: Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification: gzip
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:20:42 +0200 (EET)
Pekka Savola <[email protected]> • #6662
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:46:37 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> • #6661
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:07:07 +0100
Patrice Dumas <[email protected]> • #6660
Re: You Need Fedora Legacy!! Re: [fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:31:51 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #6659
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.