gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.general archive

349 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Removing directories/files in RPM erase
Thu, 22 May 2008 00:58:52 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12395
Removing directories/files in RPM erase
Wed, 21 May 2008 15:17:16 -0700
"Hajducko, Steven" <[email protected]> • #12394
Re: Making a slight modification and replacing an rpm with the same version - is it possible ?
Wed, 21 May 2008 17:28:50 +0300
"Ian Brown" <[email protected]> • #12393
Re: Making a slight modification and replacing an rpm with the same version - is it possible ?
Wed, 21 May 2008 08:56:17 -0400
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12392
Making a slight modification and replacing an rpm with the same version - is it possible ?
Wed, 21 May 2008 15:39:04 +0300
"Ian Brown" <[email protected]> • #12391
RPM on Windows
Tue, 20 May 2008 18:04:53 +0200
Vladimir Mihai Pacuraru <[email protected]> • #12390
RE: RPM on Windows
Tue, 20 May 2008 10:27:50 -0400
"Jason Pyeron" <[email protected]> • #12389
RE: RPM on Windows
Mon, 19 May 2008 17:06:00 -0700
"Dave Peterson" <[email protected]> • #12388
RE: RPM on Windows
Mon, 19 May 2008 19:49:13 -0400
"Jason Pyeron" <[email protected]> • #12387
RPM on Windows
Mon, 19 May 2008 09:54:45 -0700
"Dave Peterson" <[email protected]> • #12386
Re: where can we download RedHat rpm's
Mon, 19 May 2008 11:48:20 +0200
Jos Vos <[email protected]> • #12385
Re: where can we download RedHat rpm's
Mon, 19 May 2008 17:36:49 +0800
"sunhux G" <[email protected]> • #12384
RE: where can we download RedHat rpm's
Sat, 17 May 2008 19:54:47 +0800 (SGT)
[email protected] • #12383
Re: where can we download RedHat rpm's
Sat, 17 May 2008 14:13:30 +0200
Jos Vos <[email protected]> • #12382
Re: where can we download RedHat rpm's
Sat, 17 May 2008 17:35:10 +0530
"Kani Raj" <[email protected]> • #12381
where can we download RedHat rpm's
Sat, 17 May 2008 19:11:35 +0800
"sunhux G" <[email protected]> • #12380
Building db2 v9.5 rpm from payload files
Wed, 14 May 2008 15:03:50 -0500
[email protected] • #12379
Re: rpmbuild goes crazy writing duplicate files in /cd/usr/.... "Identical binaries are copied, not linked"...
Wed, 14 May 2008 18:31:43 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12378
Re: rpmbuild goes crazy writing duplicate files in /cd/usr/.... "Identical binaries are copied, not linked"...
Wed, 14 May 2008 11:11:52 -0500
"Paul Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12377
Re: rpmbuild goes crazy writing duplicate files in /cd/usr/.... "Identical binaries are copied, not linked"...
Tue, 13 May 2008 22:16:15 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12376
Re: rpmbuild goes crazy writing duplicate files in /cd/usr/.... "Identical binaries are copied, not linked"...
Tue, 13 May 2008 21:54:21 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12375
rpmbuild goes crazy writing duplicate files in /cd/usr/.... "Identical binaries are copied, not linked"...
Tue, 13 May 2008 13:26:24 -0500
"Paul Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12374
Re: rpm gives warning: can't get exclusive lock on /var/lib/rpm/Packages
Tue, 13 May 2008 13:53:56 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12373
Re: rpm gives warning: can't get exclusive lock on /var/lib/rpm/Packages
Tue, 13 May 2008 19:02:15 +0800
"sunhux G" <[email protected]> • #12372
Re: rpm gives warning: can't get exclusive lock on /var/lib/rpm/Packages
Tue, 13 May 2008 12:53:31 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12371
rpm gives warning: can't get exclusive lock on /var/lib/rpm/Packages
Tue, 13 May 2008 17:48:57 +0800
"sunhux G" <[email protected]> • #12370
Re: files getting overwritten
Fri, 9 May 2008 11:14:55 -0400
Zac Elston <[email protected]> • #12369
Re: files getting overwritten
Fri, 9 May 2008 10:58:28 -0400
Zac Elston <[email protected]> • #12368
Re: rpmdb-redhat, rpmdb-Centos, etc..
Fri, 9 May 2008 08:35:18 -0400
"Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12367
Re: RPM constructed name - how to control?
Fri, 9 May 2008 11:34:28 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12366
Re: RPM constructed name - how to control?
Thu, 8 May 2008 15:25:42 -0500 (CDT)
Tim Mooney <[email protected]> • #12365
Re: rpmdb-redhat, rpmdb-Centos, etc..
Thu, 08 May 2008 14:37:05 -0400
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12364
rpmdb-redhat, rpmdb-Centos, etc..
Thu, 8 May 2008 11:30:53 -0700
"Aaron Hanson" <[email protected]> • #12363
RPM constructed name - how to control?
Thu, 8 May 2008 11:22:12 -0700
"Hajducko, Steven" <[email protected]> • #12362
Re: unpacking of archive failed...MD5 sum mismatch
Thu, 8 May 2008 07:38:03 -0400
"Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12361
Re: files getting overwritten
Thu, 8 May 2008 10:53:21 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12360
Re: unpacking of archive failed...MD5 sum mismatch
Wed, 7 May 2008 22:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Valery Reznic <[email protected]> • #12359
Re: unpacking of archive failed...MD5 sum mismatch
Thu, 08 May 2008 15:18:48 +1000
John Newbigin <[email protected]> • #12358
Re: unpacking of archive failed...MD5 sum mismatch
Thu, 08 May 2008 15:15:19 +1000
John Newbigin <[email protected]> • #12357
Re: files getting overwritten
Wed, 7 May 2008 16:50:52 -0500
"Richard Shade" <[email protected]> • #12356
Re: files getting overwritten
Wed, 7 May 2008 17:30:25 -0400 (EDT)
"Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[email protected]> • #12355
Re: files getting overwritten
Wed, 07 May 2008 16:18:11 -0500
Rex Dieter <[email protected]> • #12354
files getting overwritten
Wed, 7 May 2008 16:17:36 -0400
Zac Elston <[email protected]> • #12353
Re: unpacking of archive failed...MD5 sum mismatch
Wed, 7 May 2008 17:43:13 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12352
Re: unpacking of archive failed...MD5 sum mismatch
Wed, 7 May 2008 15:51:50 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12351
Re: unpacking of archive failed...MD5 sum mismatch
Wed, 7 May 2008 12:38:21 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12350
unpacking of archive failed...MD5 sum mismatch
Wed, 07 May 2008 15:31:40 +1000
John Newbigin <[email protected]> • #12349
Fwd: Tony Earnshaw, 29/02/40 - 29/04/08
Sun, 4 May 2008 16:09:25 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Proulx) • #12348
Re: canonical way to detect platform/distribution
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:44:15 -0700
Michael Jennings <[email protected]> • #12347
RE: problem comparing capability version strings
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:08:21 -0700
"Dave Peterson" <[email protected]> • #12346
Best way to handle modified startup scripts
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:42:01 -0400 (EDT)
"Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[email protected]> • #12345
RE: How to update a RHEL5 Satellite Server repo
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:04:32 +0000
[email protected] • #12344
RE: How to update a RHEL5 Satellite Server repo
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:12:02 -0500
"Stanley, Jon" <[email protected]> • #12343
How to update a RHEL5 Satellite Server repo
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:56:22 +0000
[email protected] • #12342
Re: canonical way to detect platform/distribution
Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:17:53 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12341
Re: canonical way to detect platform/distribution
Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:42:12 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12340
Re: canonical way to detect platform/distribution
Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:32:26 -0400
"Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12339
Re: problem comparing capability version strings
Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:30:08 -0400
"Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12338
Two binaries into two subpackages, but with same name
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:52:42 -0700
Ian Wienand <[email protected]> • #12337
Re: How do I change the tmppath
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:50:38 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12336
Re: How do I change the tmppath
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:12:54 -0700
Michael Jennings <[email protected]> • #12335
Re: How do I change the tmppath
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:08:00 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12334
Re: How do I change the tmppath
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Valery Reznic <[email protected]> • #12333
Re: How do I change the tmppath
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:25:52 +0300 (EEST)
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #12332
canonical way to detect platform/distribution
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:02:15 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12331
How do I change the tmppath
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:42:56 -0400
Linux <[email protected]> • #12330
RE: building rpm for 64 bit m/c
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:20:20 +0530
"Suresh Sonawane" <[email protected]> • #12329
Re: building rpm for 64 bit m/c
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:47:56 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12328
building rpm for 64 bit m/c
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:16:52 +0530
"Suresh Sonawane" <[email protected]> • #12327
Re: rpm user input
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:40:44 +0200
Toralf Lund <[email protected]> • #12326
Re: rpm user input
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:43:25 +0200
Toralf Lund <[email protected]> • #12325
Re: rpm user input
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:04:18 +0530
"nived g" <[email protected]> • #12324
Re: rpm user input
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:16:49 -0400
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12323
Re: rpm user input
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:20:15 +0200
Jos Vos <[email protected]> • #12322
Re: rpm user input
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:13:57 -0400
"Brian J. Murrell" <[email protected]> • #12321
Re: rpm user input
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:09:41 +0200
Toralf Lund <[email protected]> • #12320
Re: problem comparing capability version strings
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:40:22 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12319
problem comparing capability version strings
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 19:11:24 -0700
"Dave Peterson" <[email protected]> • #12318
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:53:56 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12317
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:23:50 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12316
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:36:18 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12315
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:05:48 -0500 (CDT)
Tim Mooney <[email protected]> • #12314
RE: pathnames, etc. as required capabilities
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:53:39 -0700
"Dave Peterson" <[email protected]> • #12313
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:43:46 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12312
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:34:52 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12311
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:25:45 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12310
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:40:32 -0500
Rex Dieter <[email protected]> • #12309
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:00:11 -0400
"Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12308
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:00:25 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12307
Re: pathnames, etc. as required capabilities
Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:05:17 -0400
"Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12306
Re: pathnames, etc. as required capabilities
Sun, 6 Apr 2008 19:49:28 -0400
"Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12305
Re: pathnames, etc. as required capabilities
Sat, 5 Apr 2008 18:49:06 +0200
devzero2000 <[email protected]> • #12304
pathnames, etc. as required capabilities
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:54:18 -0700
"Dave Peterson" <[email protected]> • #12303
Re: 'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:02:53 -0400
"Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12302
'Requires' directive in spec file ignored?
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:36:21 -0400
Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #12301
Re: trying to put "--define 'macro value'" in a variable
Wed, 2 Apr 2008 00:03:20 +0200
Jos Vos <[email protected]> • #12300
trying to put "--define 'macro value'" in a variable
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:56:28 -0400
"Brian J. Murrell" <[email protected]> • #12299
Re: requires can be based on OS
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:09:25 -0400
"Jeff Johnson" <[email protected]> • #12298
requires can be based on OS
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:19:36 +0530
"satish madrage" <[email protected]> • #12297
Dealing with rpms from multiple architectures when executing rpm -Uvh
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:55:05 -0700
"Linux Subscriptions" <[email protected]> • #12296
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.