gmane.lisp.scheme.pika.devel archive

347 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:53:09 +0100
Denys Duchier <duchier-F/[email protected]> • #147
Re: Naming for mutating functions
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 07:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #146
Naming for mutating functions
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 05:02:07 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #145
Re: Things to hack on?
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:24:46 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #144
Re: C argument type for indices?
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #143
Re: Things to hack on?
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:22:13 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #142
C argument type for indices?
Mon, 02 Feb 2004 23:38:10 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #141
Re: Things to hack on?
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #140
Re: Things to hack on?
Mon, 02 Feb 2004 21:15:19 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #139
Re: Things to hack on?
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:09:50 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #138
Re: Things to hack on?
Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:23:55 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #137
Re: Things to hack on?
Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:06:11 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #136
Re: Things to hack on?
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #135
Things to hack on?
Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:26:56 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #134
Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Sun, 01 Feb 2004 19:48:18 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #133
Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:16:28 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #132
Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:41:11 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #131
Guile FFI wrapper, status report
Sun, 01 Feb 2004 01:52:53 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #130
Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #129
Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Sun, 01 Feb 2004 01:34:42 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #128
Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:32:17 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #127
Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:52:00 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #126
Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:28:24 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #125
Re: Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:14:13 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #124
Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:18:32 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #123
Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #122
Re: Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #121
Re: Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:27:42 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #120
Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:52:58 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #119
Re: Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:38:48 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #118
Re: Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 19:53:31 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #117
Guile FFI: resizable vector problem
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 19:58:04 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #116
Re: Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:21:29 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #115
Re: Guile FFI wrapper, t_scm_word ambiguity
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:03:24 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #114
Re: Guile FFI wrapper
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:56:49 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #113
Guile FFI wrapper
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:58:06 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #112
Re: Dropping the \U+xxxx. syntax for unicode characters in strings
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:01:49 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #111
Dropping the \U+xxxx. syntax for unicode characters in strings
29 Jan 2004 19:03:11 -0000
[email protected] • #110
NPO Time?
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <[email protected]> • #109
Funding Drive
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:45:12 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #108
Re: strings fix for hackerlab
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:02:38 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #107
strings fix for hackerlab
27 Jan 2004 17:44:04 -0000
[email protected] • #106
proposed srfi for extended character sets
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:31:59 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #105
Re: Memory fixes
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:15:56 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #104
Re: Memory fixes
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:55:13 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #103
Re: What's on my plate for Pika...
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:50:02 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #102
Re: Memory fixes
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:24:54 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #101
Re: Memory fixes
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #100
Re: string work
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:16:38 +0100
Jose A Ortega Ruiz <jao-mXXj517/[email protected]> • #99
Re: What's on my plate for Pika...
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:14:25 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #98
Memory fixes
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:43:09 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #97
Re: string work
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:56:34 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #96
Re: string work
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #95
Re: string work
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:13:12 +0100
Jose A Ortega Ruiz <jao-mXXj517/[email protected]> • #94
Re: string work
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:52:17 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #93
string work
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:06:50 +0100
"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" <jao-mXXj517/[email protected]> • #92
Re: so... string work
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 08:37:33 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #91
Re: so... string work
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 01:57:40 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #90
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #89
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 23:05:52 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #88
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:50:55 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #87
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 22:26:58 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #86
Re: other char/string things
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #85
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:44:14 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #84
Re: other char/string things
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:25:12 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #83
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:07:25 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #82
other char/string things
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #81
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:30:26 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #80
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #79
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:01:30 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #78
Re: Re: so... string work
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:42:29 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #77
Re: so... string work
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:20:06 +0100
Jose A Ortega Ruiz <jao-mXXj517/[email protected]> • #76
Re: so... string work
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:58:49 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #75
Re: so... string work
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 22:28:18 +0100
"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" <jao-mXXj517/[email protected]> • #74
so... string work
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:58:50 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #73
strings draft
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #72
Re: test message
Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:26:40 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #71
test message
Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:40:52 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #70
request for merge -- gc and numbers fixes
Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:06:21 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #69
issues in choosing a broken heart
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:04:26 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #68
ugly repl for Pika
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:27:10 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #67
Re: What's on my plate for Pika...
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:05:07 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #66
Re: What's on my plate for Pika...
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:17:35 +0100
Andreas Rottmann <[email protected]> • #65
cvt-bignum and cvt-bigrat
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:34:15 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #64
What's on my plate for Pika...
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:50:00 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #63
Re: new code: character special names
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:18:09 +0100
"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" <jao-mXXj517/[email protected]> • #62
Re: status on numbers
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:11:03 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #61
Re: status on numbers
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:32:04 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #60
Re: status on numbers
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #59
Re: status on numbers
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:07:15 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #58
Re: status on numbers
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:13:31 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #57
status on numbers
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:53:46 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #56
Re: viewarch
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:11:43 +0100
"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" <jao-mXXj517/[email protected]> • #55
Re: new code: character special names
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #54
Re: Naming issues in implementing numbers
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #53
Re: Naming issues in implementing numbers
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:37:31 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #52
Re: viewarch
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:01:34 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #51
Re: viewarch
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:41:45 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #50
Naming issues in implementing numbers
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:23:33 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #49
mailserver test
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:53:11 +0100
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #48
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.