gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin archive

1040 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 11). Latest articles →

Re: Overwriting local_scan.c to buildy
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Marilyn Davis <[email protected]> • #331
RE: run condition
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 07:54:34 -0400
"Jerry Rasmussen" <[email protected]> • #330
run condition
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:18:10 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #329
Re: Overwriting local_scan.c to build
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:53:39 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #328
Overwriting local_scan.c to build
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Marilyn Davis <[email protected]> • #327
RE: SA-Exim errors
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 15:52:23 -0400
"Jerry Rasmussen" <[email protected]> • #326
Re: SA-Exim errors
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 21:27:04 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #325
Re: Extra stuff in reject.log
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:10:22 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #324
Re: SA-Exim errors
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:05:23 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #323
Extra stuff in reject.log
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:27:47 -0500
"Terry Shows" <[email protected]> • #322
Re: spamassin and Postfix ?
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 14:01:45 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #321
Re: SA-Exim errors
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 13:54:22 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #320
Re: SA-Exim errors
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 07:51:49 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #319
RE: SA-Exim errors
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:38:29 -0400
"Jerry Rasmussen" <[email protected]> • #318
Re: SA-Exim errors
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:23:00 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #317
SA-Exim errors
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:22:20 -0400
"Jerry Rasmussen" <[email protected]> • #316
Re: spamassin and Postfix ?
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:49:50 +0300
ODHIAMBO Washington <[email protected]> • #315
RE: spamassin and Postfix ?
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Schoolcraft <[email protected]> • #314
Re: spamassin and Postfix ?
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:55:10 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #313
Re: logging spammer ips
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:48:26 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #312
RE: sa-exim and whiltelists
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:41:51 -0600
Nick <[email protected]> • #311
Re: sa-exim and whiltelists
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:39:33 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #310
Re: sa-exim and whiltelists
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:36:58 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #309
RE: sa-exim and whiltelists
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:26:12 -0600
Nick <[email protected]> • #308
RE: spamassin and Postfix ?
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:07:30 -0600
Nick <[email protected]> • #307
spamassin and Postfix ?
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Schoolcraft <[email protected]> • #306
logging spammer ips
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:27:08 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> • #305
sa-exim and whiltelists
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:20:34 -0600
Nick <[email protected]> • #304
Re: RunCond......baffles me.
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 06:21:29 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #303
RE: RunCond......baffles me.
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:34:02 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #302
Re: RunCond......baffles me.
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:20:36 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #301
RunCond......baffles me.
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:12:45 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #300
Re: spamassassin and bounces
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:34:49 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #299
RE: spamassassin and bounces
11 Jun 2003 15:54:44 +0200
Laurent Luyckx <[email protected]> • #298
RE: spamassassin and bounces
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:49:48 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #297
Re: spamassassin and bounces
11 Jun 2003 15:44:50 +0200
Laurent Luyckx <[email protected]> • #296
Re: spamassassin and bounces
11 Jun 2003 15:39:03 +0200
Laurent Luyckx <[email protected]> • #295
Re: spamassassin and bounces
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:33:59 +0200
Richard Lithvall <[email protected]> • #294
spamassassin and bounces
11 Jun 2003 15:25:28 +0200
Laurent Luyckx <[email protected]> • #293
RE: patch
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:52:51 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #292
Re: patch
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:48:03 +0200
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> • #291
patch
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:35:06 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #290
Re: Per user whitelisting or rejection
Mon, 09 Jun 2003 22:06:44 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #289
Re: Per user whitelisting or rejection
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:41:12 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #285
Re: Per user whitelisting or rejection
Mon, 09 Jun 2003 19:25:03 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #284
Re: Per user whitelisting or rejection
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 08:50:28 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #283
Re: Teergrube output
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:22:03 +0200
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> • #282
Re: Teergrube output
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 07:18:12 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #281
Re: Teergrube output
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:40:29 +0200
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> • #280
Re: Teergrube output
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 14:40:22 +0200
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> • #279
Re: Debian package of sa-exim?
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 23:52:34 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #278
Debian package of sa-exim?
Sun, 08 Jun 2003 20:28:53 -0700
Jeff Breidenbach <[email protected]> • #277
Re: Teergrube output
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 18:34:01 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #276
Re: logfile entry for max. teergrube time
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 17:57:38 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #275
Re: A little help on SAEximRunCond & rcpt domain based lookups
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 22:58:19 +0200
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> • #274
Re: A little help on SAEximRunCond & rcpt domain based lookups
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 20:57:08 +0200
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> • #273
Re: A little help on SAEximRunCond & rcpt domain based lookups
Sun, 08 Jun 2003 22:42:08 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #271
A little help on SAEximRunCond & rcpt domain based lookups
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:55:23 +0200
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> • #268
Re: Fails to expand
Fri, 6 Jun 2003 22:46:33 +0200
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> • #267
Fails to expand
Fri, 6 Jun 2003 22:41:48 +0200
Sander Smeenk <[email protected]> • #266
teergrube whitelist (possible?)
Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:59:40 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> • #265
RE: Upgrade to SA-Exim 3.0 from 2.2
Sat, 31 May 2003 22:57:32 -0400
"Jerry Rasmussen" <[email protected]> • #264
Re: Upgrade to SA-Exim 3.0 from 2.2
Sat, 31 May 2003 18:59:27 +0100
Tim Jackson <[email protected]> • #263
Re: Verbose reports?
Thu, 29 May 2003 22:06:12 +0200
Richard Lithvall <[email protected]> • #262
Verbose reports?
Thu, 29 May 2003 15:28:30 -0400
Brian Kendig <[email protected]> • #261
Re: [Exim] Exim, SpamAssassin, and interpreting results
Thu, 29 May 2003 12:47:41 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> • #260
RE: Upgrade to SA-Exim 3.0 from 2.2
Tue, 27 May 2003 20:15:24 -0400
"Jerry Rasmussen" <[email protected]> • #259
Re: How to apply localscan_dlopen.patch ?
Tue, 27 May 2003 15:57:08 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> • #258
Re: How to apply localscan_dlopen.patch ?
27 May 2003 21:25:23 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #257
Re: How to apply localscan_dlopen.patch ?
Tue, 27 May 2003 09:42:04 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> • #256
Re: How to apply localscan_dlopen.patch ?
27 May 2003 12:13:39 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #255
How to apply localscan_dlopen.patch ?
Tue, 27 May 2003 02:38:42 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> • #254
Re: Upgrade to SA-Exim 3.0 from 2.2
Mon, 26 May 2003 21:55:44 +0100
Tim Jackson <[email protected]> • #253
RE: Upgrade to SA-Exim 3.0 from 2.2
Mon, 26 May 2003 09:16:41 -0400
"Jerry Rasmussen" <[email protected]> • #252
Re: Upgrade to SA-Exim 3.0 from 2.2
26 May 2003 12:15:05 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #251
Re: Upgrade to SA-Exim 3.0 from 2.2
Mon, 26 May 2003 10:25:46 +0100
Tim Jackson <[email protected]> • #250
Re: Upgrade to SA-Exim 3.0 from 2.2
26 May 2003 06:46:23 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #249
Upgrade to SA-Exim 3.0 from 2.2
Sun, 25 May 2003 15:31:27 -0400
"Jerry Rasmussen" <[email protected]> • #248
Re: sa-exim mail ironically popping up as spam
Sat, 24 May 2003 21:10:00 +0000
simon raven <[email protected]> • #247
Re: sa-exim mail ironically popping up as spam
24 May 2003 14:56:10 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #246
Re: sa-exim mail ironically popping up as spam
Fri, 23 May 2003 15:25:25 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #245
Re: sa-exim mail ironically popping up as spam
23 May 2003 23:36:11 +0200
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]> • #244
sa-exim-stats version 0.60
Fri, 23 May 2003 23:36:59 +0200 (CEST)
"Martin Balvers" <[email protected]> • #243
sa-exim mail ironically popping up as spam
Fri, 23 May 2003 20:24:32 +0000
simon raven <[email protected]> • #242
Re: spamassassin.conf in sa-exim-3.0
Wed, 21 May 2003 23:03:41 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #241
spamassassin.conf in sa-exim-3.0
Thu, 22 May 2003 07:58:55 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #240
Do you want an announce list?
Wed, 21 May 2003 16:56:59 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #239
Re: logfile entry for max. teergrube time
Wed, 21 May 2003 13:44:38 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #238
Re: Trouble with sa-exim that just poped up.
Wed, 21 May 2003 13:41:41 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #237
why do all my own mails get scanned????
Wed, 21 May 2003 12:29:10 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #236
Re: Which version(s) of spamassassin?
Tue, 20 May 2003 23:49:49 +0200
Richard Lithvall <[email protected]> • #235
logfile entry for max. teergrube time
Tue, 20 May 2003 21:39:30 +0200 (CEST)
"Martin Balvers" <[email protected]> • #234
Re: +nosarej ?????
Tue, 20 May 2003 09:37:20 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #233
Re: X-SA-Do-Not-Run
Tue, 20 May 2003 09:38:44 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #232
Re: SA-exim panic: Bad file number
Tue, 20 May 2003 09:34:19 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #231
X-SA-Do-Not-Run
Tue, 20 May 2003 14:57:40 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #230
+nosarej ?????
Tue, 20 May 2003 13:58:11 +0200
Thomas Kinghorn <[email protected]> • #229
SA-exim panic: Bad file number
Tue, 20 May 2003 10:14:09 +0200
Hans-Peter Zahno <[email protected]> • #228
Re: Where are the required hits for SA set?
Tue, 20 May 2003 00:46:15 -0700
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #227
Re: Where are the required hits for SA set?
Tue, 20 May 2003 10:16:37 +0300
ODHIAMBO Washington <[email protected]> • #226
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.