gmane.mail.ng archive

364 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: mailbox format(s)
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:15:35 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #630
Re: SMTP and multicasting
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:27:30 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #629
Re: mailbox format(s)
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:06:35 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #628
Re: mailbox format(s)
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:40:48 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #627
Re: mailbox format(s)
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:34:59 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #626
Re: mailbox format(s)
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:23:41 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #625
RE: mailbox format(s)
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:11:18 +0100
"Victor Engmark" <[email protected]> • #624
Re: mailbox format(s)
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:31:15 +1100
Brett Watson <[email protected]> • #623
Re: Transport Protocol vs. Message Format
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:37:15 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #622
Re: mailbox format(s)
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:26:52 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #621
Re: mailbox format(s)
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:43:44 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #620
Re: Transport Protocol vs. Message Format
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:35:01 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #619
Re: mailbox format(s)
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:16:44 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #618
RE: visions
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:19:23 +0100
"Victor Engmark" <[email protected]> • #617
Re: user-visible goals
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:40:00 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #616
Re: mailbox format(s)
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:33:18 -0500
J C Lawrence <[email protected]> • #615
Re: mailbox format(s)
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:22:55 -0000
"Guðbjörn S. Hreinsson" <[email protected]> • #614
Re: visions
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:27:36 +0000
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #613
Re: mailbox format(s)
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:12:09 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #612
mailbox format(s)
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:37:34 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #611
Re: Transport Protocol vs. Message Format
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:10:46 +0000 (GMT)
John Berthels <[email protected]> • #610
Re: SMTP and multicasting
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:20:34 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #609
RE: More user-visible goals
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:42:51 +0100
"Victor Engmark" <[email protected]> • #608
Transport Protocol vs. Message Format
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:33:31 +1100
Brett Watson <[email protected]> • #607
Re: visions
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:47:49 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #606
Re: user-visible goals
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:29:49 +0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #605
RE: SMTP and multicasting
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:29:40 -0500
"Bonatti, Chris" <[email protected]> • #604
Re: visions
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:09:44 +0100
Markus Stumpf <[email protected]> • #603
RE: visions
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:03:01 -0600
"Dustin D. Trammell" <[email protected]> • #602
Re: visions
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:39:44 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #601
Re: More user-visible goals
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:56:48 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #600
Re: visions
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:08:45 +0100
Markus Stumpf <[email protected]> • #599
Re: user-visible goals
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:43:22 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #598
Re: visions
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:11:47 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #597
More user-visible goals
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:07:50 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #596
RE: user-visible goals
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:58:15 +0100
"Victor Engmark" <[email protected]> • #595
Re: user-visible goals
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:52:22 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #594
Re: user-visible goals
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:16:24 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #593
Re: user-visible goals
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 03:07:10 +0100
Markus Stumpf <[email protected]> • #592
Re: user-visible goals
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:01:56 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #591
RE: user-visible goals
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:00:39 +0100
Secretariat <[email protected]> • #590
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:23:30 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #589
RE: user-visible goals
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:50:02 +0100
"Victor Engmark" <[email protected]> • #588
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:45:26 +0000 (GMT)
John Berthels <[email protected]> • #587
RE: user-visible goals
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:14:48 +0100
"Victor Engmark" <[email protected]> • #586
Re: visions
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:54:10 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #585
Re: user-visible goals
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:57:17 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #584
Re: user-visible goals
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:18:05 -0500
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]> • #583
Re: visions
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:49:31 +0100
Markus Stumpf <[email protected]> • #582
Re: visions
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:27:58 +0100
Markus Stumpf <[email protected]> • #581
Re: visions
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:44:53 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #580
RE: visions
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:14:13 -0000
Piers Chivers <[email protected]> • #579
visions
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:29:09 +0100
Markus Stumpf <[email protected]> • #578
Re: Writing it down
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:48:56 +0800
James Seng <[email protected]> • #577
Re: Email or Something Else
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:04:02 -0500
Abe Drier <[email protected]> • #576
Re: Email or Something Else
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:39:38 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #575
Re: Email or Something Else
21 Feb 2004 19:16:03 +0000
Paul Crowley <[email protected]> • #574
RE: Email or Something Else
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:07:45 -0500
"Bonatti, Chris" <[email protected]> • #573
RE: Email or Something Else
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:57:09 -0000
"David W Morgan" <[email protected]> • #572
FW: Email or Something Else
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:48:02 -0000
"David W Morgan" <[email protected]> • #571
Re: Email or Something Else
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:25:38 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #570
Re: Email or Something Else
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:37:42 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #569
Re: Email or Something Else
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:10:10 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #568
Re: Email or Something Else
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:38:11 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #567
RE: Email or Something Else
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:49:35 -0000
"David W Morgan" <[email protected]> • #566
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:48:47 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #565
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:51:25 +0100
Jochen Topf <[email protected]> • #564
Re: Suggest starting by defining the basic service that is to be provided
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:48:15 -0500
Abe Drier <[email protected]> • #563
Re: Suggest starting by defining the basic service that is to be provided
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:39:14 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #562
Suggest starting by defining the basic service that is to be provided
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:26:09 -0500
Abe Drier <[email protected]> • #561
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:47:01 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #560
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 08:32:51 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #559
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:58:31 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #558
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:47:15 +0200
Alan Barrett <[email protected]> • #557
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:32:46 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #556
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:02:36 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #555
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:30:57 -0800 (PST)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #554
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:17:51 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #553
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:58:00 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #552
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:52:19 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #551
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:45:25 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #550
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:42:24 -0800 (PST)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #549
Incentive to move to mail-ng
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:59:14 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #548
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:04:56 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #547
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:54:10 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #546
f2f meeting on mail architecture and infrastructure
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:30:31 +0100
Secretariat <[email protected]> • #545
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:43:49 -0800 (PST)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #544
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:06:06 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #543
Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:19:04 +0100
Jochen Topf <[email protected]> • #542
Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:17:51 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #541
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:22:24 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #540
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:59:20 +0100
Jochen Topf <[email protected]> • #539
Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:32:13 +0100
Jochen Topf <[email protected]> • #538
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:41:38 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #537
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:38:40 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #536
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:46:27 -0500 (EST)
Richard Welty <[email protected]> • #535
External Body (Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?)
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:37:19 +1100
Brett Watson <[email protected]> • #534
Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:28:56 -0800
Einar Stefferud <[email protected]> • #533
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:00:50 -0800 (PST)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #532
Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:50:01 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #531
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.