gmane.mail.ng archive

365 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Mail Path MTU discovery?
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:38:18 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #530
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:33:10 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #529
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:21:43 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #528
Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:28:37 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #527
Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:54:37 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #526
Mail expiry before delivery
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:16:35 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #525
Mail Path MTU discovery?
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:56:16 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #524
Re: Mail Cookies
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:50:45 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #523
Re: Mail Cookies
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:46:00 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #522
Re: Mail Cookies
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:24:59 +0000 (GMT)
John Berthels <[email protected]> • #521
Re: Storage: service provider vs user
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:13:29 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #520
Re: Storage: service provider vs user
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:54:52 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #519
Re: Storage: service provider vs user
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:00:19 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #518
Re: Mail Cookies
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:43:58 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #517
Re: Storage: service provider vs user
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:33:47 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #516
Re: Consensual communication (Re: Visible feature: not free to send?)
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:23:07 +0100
Alex van den Bogaerdt <[email protected]> • #515
Re: Consensual communication (Re: Visible feature: not free to send?)
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:49:04 -0800
Einar Stefferud <[email protected]> • #514
Storage: service provider vs user
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:31:39 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #513
Re: Mail Cookies
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:52:02 -0800 (PST)
"william<at>elan.net" <[email protected]> • #512
Re: Mail Cookies
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:26:19 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #511
Re: Mail Cookies
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:39:35 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #510
Re: Mail Cookies
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:14:21 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #509
Re: Consensual communication (Re: Visible feature: not free to send?)
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:45:16 +0000
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #508
Consensual communication (Re: Visible feature: not free to send?)
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:16:53 +1100
Brett Watson <[email protected]> • #507
Re: Mail Cookies
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:13:56 +0000 (GMT)
John Berthels <[email protected]> • #506
Visible feature: not free to send?
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:50:42 +0000
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #505
Re: Mail Cookies
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:27:37 +1100
Brett Watson <[email protected]> • #504
Re: Mail Cookies
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:17:00 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #503
Re: Mail Cookies
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 23:56:12 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #502
Re: Mail Cookies
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:26:40 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #501
Re: The need for two headers
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 23:06:36 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #500
Re: The need for two headers
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:33:50 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #499
Re: The need for two headers
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:50:30 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #498
Re: The need for two headers
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:29:50 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #497
Re: Mail Cookies
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:44:08 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #496
Re: Mail Cookies
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:22:56 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #495
Mail Cookies
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:07:55 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #494
Class of Service
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:17:34 EST
[email protected] • #493
RE: On the spam problem...
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:19:33 -0500
"Bonatti, Chris" <[email protected]> • #492
RE: Email or Something Else
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:01:08 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #491
RE: list of user-visible goals
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:44:59 +0100
"Victor Engmark" <[email protected]> • #490
New International Requirements Possibly?
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:41:59 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #489
Re: Email or Something Else
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 03:38:56 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #488
Re: Email or Something Else
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:16:23 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #487
Re: Email or Something Else
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:59:52 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #486
Automating Permission/Trust based system
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:55:28 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #485
RE: Email or Something Else
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:27:30 -0500
"Bonatti, Chris" <[email protected]> • #484
user requirement -- Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection
Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:25:49 -0800
Ed Gerck <[email protected]> • #483
Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:51:40 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #482
Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection
Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:01:37 -0800
Ed Gerck <[email protected]> • #481
Re: Email or Something Else
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:10:23 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #480
Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 08:02:29 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #479
Re: Email or Something Else
09 Feb 2004 12:30:20 +0000
Paul Crowley <[email protected]> • #478
Email or Something Else
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:10:15 -0500
"Bonatti, Chris" <[email protected]> • #477
Goals: Readability / transferability
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:33:24 +0100
"Victor Engmark" <[email protected]> • #476
RE: Why XML (was: Re: What I see as problems to solve ... and a strawman solution)
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 21:41:50 -0800
"Jim Schaad" <[email protected]> • #475
Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:42:19 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #474
built-in spam burden & email privacy protection
Sun, 08 Feb 2004 15:58:52 -0800
Ed Gerck <[email protected]> • #473
Re: operator-visible goals?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 15:18:26 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #472
Re: operator-visible goals?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 15:09:50 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #471
Re: Challenge Response ?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:25:16 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #470
Re: operator-visible goals?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:15:44 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #469
Re: Challenge Response ?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:51:05 -0800 (PST)
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #468
Re: The need for two headers
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:52:02 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #467
Re: operator-visible goals?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:52:02 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #466
Re: The need for two headers
08 Feb 2004 16:29:51 +0000
Paul Crowley <[email protected]> • #465
Re: The need for two headers
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:22:35 +1100
Brett Watson <[email protected]> • #464
Re: Challenge Response ?
08 Feb 2004 16:24:24 +0000
Paul Crowley <[email protected]> • #463
Re: The need for two headers
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:42:02 -0600
Steven F Siirila <[email protected]> • #462
Re: Legal Requirements?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 15:26:14 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #461
Re: Another User Requirement Consider: Dates
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:19:14 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #460
Re: additional requirements
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 14:14:11 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #459
RE: Legal Requirements?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 04:58:34 -0800
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email protected]> • #458
Re: The need for two headers
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:40:03 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #457
Challenge Response ?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:56:07 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #456
Re: The need for two headers
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:53:44 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #455
Re: Legal Requirements?
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:47:20 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #454
Re: Another User Requirement Consider: Dates
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:07:52 +1100
Brett Watson <[email protected]> • #453
Another User Requirement Consider: Dates
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 23:56:21 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #452
Re: additional requirements
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:15:46 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #451
Re: The need for two headers
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:24:55 +1100
Brett Watson <[email protected]> • #450
Re: Legal Requirements?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:26:14 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #449
additional requirements
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:54:59 +0100
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #448
Re: Legal Requirements?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:45:04 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #447
Re: Legal Requirements?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 23:25:35 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #446
Re: operator-visible goals?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 23:15:53 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #445
Re: operator-visible goals?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 17:13:46 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #444
Re: Legal Requirements?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:05:03 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #443
Re: The need for two headers
07 Feb 2004 21:09:06 +0000
Paul Crowley <[email protected]> • #442
Re: operator-visible goals?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 15:52:54 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #441
Re: operator-visible goals?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:36:38 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #440
Re: list of user-visible goals
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:13:19 -0500
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #439
operator-visible goals?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:17:36 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #438
Re: taxonomies
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:47:23 -0800
Einar Stefferud <[email protected]> • #437
Re: The need for two headers
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:35:14 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #436
Legal Requirements?
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:39:35 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #435
Re: VMN: Virtual Mail Networks (ESMTP)
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 09:49:59 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #434
Re: The need for two headers
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 09:48:31 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #433
Re: The need for two headers
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 18:28:11 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #432
Re: VMN: Virtual Mail Networks (ESMTP)
Sat, 07 Feb 2004 18:23:13 +0100
Andrzej Filip <[email protected]> • #431
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.