gmane.os.netbsd.ports.x86-64 archive

376 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:38:04 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6517
Re: Intel ICH GPIO
Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:45:24 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #6516
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:23:07 +0200
Rhialto <[email protected]> • #6515
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:55:32 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6514
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:37:07 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6513
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 23:24:40 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #6512
Re: Intel ICH GPIO
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 08:44:21 -0500
"Jonathan A. Kollasch" <[email protected]> • #6511
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 14:35:19 +0100
Mike Pumford <[email protected]> • #6510
Re: Intel ICH GPIO
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 15:44:19 +0300
Andrius V <[email protected]> • #6509
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 21:39:59 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6508
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 21:38:33 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6507
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 08:51:46 +0000
nia <[email protected]> • #6506
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 13:52:42 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #6505
Intel ICH GPIO
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 13:30:53 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #6504
Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sat, 5 Oct 2024 14:38:30 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6503
Re: NetBSD as a laptop OS ?
Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:59:19 -0400
John McCue <[email protected]> • #6502
Re: NetBSD as a laptop OS ?
Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:15:22 +0000
nia <[email protected]> • #6501
Re: NetBSD as a laptop OS ?
Tue, 1 Oct 2024 12:15:52 +0200
Roddy González <[email protected]> • #6500
Re: NetBSD as a laptop OS ?
Tue, 1 Oct 2024 07:10:29 +0930
Brett Lymn <[email protected]> • #6499
Re: bogus MADT X2APIC entry [Re: illegal instruction in kernel at boot]
Mon, 30 Sep 2024 19:03:23 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #6498
Re: NetBSD as a laptop OS ?
Mon, 30 Sep 2024 18:16:49 +0200
Roddy González <[email protected]> • #6497
NetBSD as a laptop OS ?
Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:29:44 +0000
"Mathew, Cherry G." <[email protected]> • #6496
Re: bogus MADT X2APIC entry [Re: illegal instruction in kernel at boot]
Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:09:47 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6495
Re: bogus MADT X2APIC entry [Re: illegal instruction in kernel at boot]
Sat, 28 Sep 2024 18:23:07 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #6494
Re: bogus MADT X2APIC entry [Re: illegal instruction in kernel at boot]
Sun, 29 Sep 2024 00:35:32 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6493
bogus MADT X2APIC entry [Re: illegal instruction in kernel at boot]
Sat, 28 Sep 2024 17:25:34 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #6492
Re: illegal instruction in kernel at boot
Thu, 26 Sep 2024 17:48:30 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #6491
illegal instruction in kernel at boot
Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:20:35 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #6490
panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "x86_read_psl() == 0" failed
Sun, 11 Aug 2024 20:42:09 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #6489
Re: Nouveau not initializing correctly with stock kernel of NetBSD 10.0.0
Sun, 11 Aug 2024 14:40:17 +0200
Connor McLaughlan <[email protected]> • #6488
vio9p vs. GENERIC.local vs. XEN3_DOM[0U]
Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:48:39 +0200
Christoph Badura <[email protected]> • #6487
Re: Nouveau not initializing correctly with stock kernel of NetBSD 10.0.0
Sat, 10 Aug 2024 23:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #6486
Nouveau not initializing correctly with stock kernel of NetBSD 10.0.0
Sat, 10 Aug 2024 17:00:11 +0200
Connor McLaughlan <[email protected]> • #6485
re: HEADS UP: plan to switch many ports over to GCC 12 soon
Sun, 16 Jun 2024 06:40:22 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #6484
Re: way to fix "acpiec0: autoconfiguration error: GPE query method _Q33 fai led"?
Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:53:15 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #6483
way to fix "acpiec0: autoconfiguration error: GPE query method _Q33 fai led"?
Sun, 21 Apr 2024 20:50:22 +0900
Henry <[email protected]> • #6482
Re: 10.0 on VE-900
Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:12:33 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #6481
Re: 10.0 on VE-900
Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:01:47 +0300
Andrius V <[email protected]> • #6480
Re: stuck in boot with i915drmkms on DVI
Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:30:04 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #6479
Re: 10.0 on VE-900
Mon, 8 Apr 2024 11:20:26 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #6478
Re: 10.0 on VE-900
Sun, 7 Apr 2024 12:59:05 +0300
Andrius V <[email protected]> • #6477
stuck in boot with i915drmkms on DVI
Sun, 7 Apr 2024 14:31:02 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #6476
10.0 on VE-900
Sun, 7 Apr 2024 07:33:30 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #6475
Re: athn autoconfiguration not asking for SSID during 10_RC3 INSTALL
Sun, 28 Jan 2024 12:23:29 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #6474
RE: athn autoconfiguration not asking for SSID during 10_RC3 INSTALL
Sun, 28 Jan 2024 11:12:01 +0000
Josh Moyer <[email protected]> • #6473
Re: athn autoconfiguration not asking for SSID during 10_RC3 INSTALL
Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:28:21 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #6472
Re: athn autoconfiguration not asking for SSID during 10_RC3 INSTALL
Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:48:50 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #6471
RE: athn autoconfiguration not asking for SSID during 10_RC3 INSTALL
Sun, 21 Jan 2024 17:32:11 +0000
Josh Moyer <[email protected]> • #6470
RE: unknown device major 0xffffffffffffffff during 10_RC3 INSTALL boot
Sun, 21 Jan 2024 17:20:35 +0000
Josh Moyer <[email protected]> • #6469
Re: unknown device major 0xffffffffffffffff during 10_RC3 INSTALL boot
Sun, 21 Jan 2024 07:49:10 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #6468
Re: athn autoconfiguration not asking for SSID during 10_RC3 INSTALL
Sun, 21 Jan 2024 07:46:54 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #6467
unknown device major 0xffffffffffffffff during 10_RC3 INSTALL boot
Sun, 21 Jan 2024 03:09:05 +0000
Josh Moyer <[email protected]> • #6466
athn autoconfiguration not asking for SSID during 10_RC3 INSTALL
Sun, 21 Jan 2024 03:09:03 +0000
Josh Moyer <[email protected]> • #6465
Re: x2APIC APIC ID value less than 255
Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:29:31 +0100
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #6464
x2APIC APIC ID value less than 255
Sat, 30 Dec 2023 17:30:38 +0900
Masanobu SAITOH <[email protected]> • #6463
Re: firefox, CUPS, glib2 et al
Fri, 15 Dec 2023 11:09:44 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6462
firefox, CUPS, glib2 et al
Fri, 15 Dec 2023 15:41:08 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Steve Blinkhorn) • #6461
Re: wm + vlan tso4 problem with 10_BETA
Wed, 1 Nov 2023 15:24:18 +0900
Masanobu SAITOH <[email protected]> • #6460
Re: wm + vlan tso4 problem with 10_BETA
Wed, 1 Nov 2023 10:56:15 +0900
Masanobu SAITOH <[email protected]> • #6459
wm + vlan tso4 problem with 10_BETA
Sat, 14 Oct 2023 14:09:13 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #6458
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:00:41 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6457
Re: Genesys USB3 hub shows up as USB2 (SOLVED)
Mon, 4 Sep 2023 15:10:41 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #6456
Re: Genesys USB3 hub shows up as USB2 (SOLVED)
Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:01:55 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6455
Genesys USB3 hub shows up as USB2
Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:12:35 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6454
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 18:06:47 +0100
David Brownlee <[email protected]> • #6453
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 15:55:45 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #6452
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 09:53:35 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #6451
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 09:36:43 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6450
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 09:12:20 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #6449
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 08:48:05 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6448
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 14:08:31 +0200
Tobias Nygren <[email protected]> • #6447
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 07:57:12 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6446
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 07:20:05 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #6445
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:10:50 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6444
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:57:18 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #6443
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:51:38 -0400
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #6442
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:43:41 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #6441
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 18:07:09 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6440
Re: bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:54:38 +0200
Ignatios Souvatzis <[email protected]> • #6439
bootxx needs to fit within 0th track of MBR partition?
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:43:16 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #6438
Intel Graphics 630 works well with netbsd-10 native xorg
Mon, 21 Aug 2023 11:40:18 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6437
Re: Intel builtin graphics, wsfb, gop - uses EDID?
Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:36:01 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6436
Re: Intel builtin graphics, wsfb, gop - uses EDID?
Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:24:39 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #6435
Re: Intel builtin graphics, wsfb, gop - uses EDID?
Fri, 18 Aug 2023 00:39:32 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #6434
Intel builtin graphics, wsfb, gop - uses EDID?
Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:26:30 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6433
protectli experience?
Mon, 03 Jul 2023 10:51:16 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6432
[email protected]
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 16:40:45 -0300
stremelek <[email protected]> • #6431
Re: booting NetBSD 9 on a 2010 imac?
Mon, 29 May 2023 19:27:29 +0000
Josh Moyer <[email protected]> • #6430
[email protected]
Thu, 25 May 2023 01:37:27 +0300
zirritrofeo <[email protected]> • #6429
Re: Make kernel self-relocatable [PATCH]
Tue, 2 May 2023 00:41:09 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #6428
Re: Make kernel self-relocatable [PATCH]
Tue, 2 May 2023 00:39:44 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #6427
Re: Make kernel self-relocatable [PATCH]
Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:10:41 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #6426
Make kernel self-relocatable [PATCH]
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:32:58 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #6425
Re: port-amd64/53126
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:45:36 -0600
Robert Nestor <[email protected]> • #6424
Re: NetBSD 9 kernel complaints about new BIOS
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:03:01 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #6423
NetBSD 9 kernel complaints about new BIOS
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:18:25 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6422
Re: tco at ichsmb
Sun, 25 Sep 2022 19:50:36 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #6421
tco at ichsmb
Sat, 24 Sep 2022 13:59:43 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #6420
Re: PXE-booting a Dell PowerEdge R6515 fails
Sun, 11 Sep 2022 13:58:40 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #6419
PXE-booting a Dell PowerEdge R6515 fails
Fri, 9 Sep 2022 15:58:20 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #6418
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.